Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pathologie tubaire

  • Chapter
IRM du pelvis de l’homme et de la femme

  • 639 Accesses

Résumé

L’échographie endovaginale est le premier examen réalisé en pratique courante. Dans la plupart des cas, elle permet de diagnostiquer une anomalie tubaire qui nécessite parfois un complément par IRM. Nous verrons à travers ce chapitre les principales anomalies de la trompe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Hemsell DL (1988) Acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Etiologic and therapeutic considerations. J Reprod Med 33: 119–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomassin-Naggara I, Dubernard G, Lafont C, et al. (2008) Imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease. J Radiol 89: 134–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Chiowanich P, et al. (1998) Dilated fallopian tubes: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 208: 463–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowling SE, Ramchandani P (1996) Imaging of the fallopian tubes. Semin Roentgenol 31: 299–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardaens Y, Guerin du Masgenet B, Coquel PH (2001) Echographie en pratique gynécologique. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balleyguier C, Perrot N (2008) IRM sein, gynécologie, obstétrique. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hata K, Hata H, Aoki S, et al. (1989) Ultrasonographic evalutaion of pelvic inflammatory disease. Noppin sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 41: 895–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sam JW, Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA (2002) Spectrum of CT findings in acute pyogenic pelvis inflammatory disease. Radiographies 22: 1327–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ha HK, Lim GY, Cha ES, et al. (1995) MRI imaging of tubo-ovarian abscess. Acta radiol 36: 510–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Callen PW (1979) Computed tomographic evaluation of abdominal and pelvic abscesses. Radiology 131:171–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomassin-Naggara I, Fournier LS, Roussel A, et al. (2010) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the female pelvis. J Radiol 91:431–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hawnaur JM, Reynolds K, Mc Gettigan C (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of actinomycosis presenting as pelvic malignancy. Br J Radiol 72: 1006–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SH, Kim SH, Yang DM, Kim KA (2004) Unusual causes of tubo-ovarian abscess: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 24: 1575–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamai K, Koyama T, Togashi K (2007) MR features of ectopic pregnancy. Eur Radiol 17: 3236–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kataoka ML, Togashi K, Kobayashi H, et al. (1999) Evaluation of ectopic pregnancy by magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 14: 2644–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lau S, Tulandi T (1999) Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 72: 207–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamada S, Naka O, Moride N, et al. (1997) Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging findings in a patient with an unruptured interstitial pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73: 197–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ha HK, Jung JK, Kang SJ, et al. (1993) MR imaging in the diagnosis of rare forms of ectopic pregnancy. Am J Roentgenol 160: 1229–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Torashima M, et al. (1995) Unruptured interstitial pregnancy: a pitfall of MR imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 19: 241–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gougoutas CA, Siegelman ES, Hunt J, Outwater EK (2000) Pelvic endometriosis: various manifestations and MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175: 353–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Chiowanich P, et al. (1998) Dilated fallopian tubes: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 208: 463–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. David MP, Ben-Zwi D, Langer L (1981) Tubal intramural polyps and their relationship to infertility. Fertil Steril 35: 526–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Slanetz PJ, Whitman GJ, Halpern EF, et al. (1997) Imaging of fallopian tube tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 1321–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vicus D, Finch A, Rosen B, et al. (2010) Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group. Risk factors for carcinoma of the fallopian tube in women with and without a germline BRCA mutation. Gynecol Oncol 118: 155–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawakami S, Togashi K, Kimura I, et al. (1993) Primary malignant tumor of the fallopian tube: appearance at CT and MR imaging. Radiology 186: 503–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eddy GL, Copeland LJ, Gershenson DM, et al. (1984) Fallopian tube carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 64: 546–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim MY, Rha SE, Oh SN, et al. (2009) MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 29: 495–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Raju KS, Barker GH, Wiltshaw E (1981) Primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Report of 22 cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 88: 1124–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roberts JA, Lifshitz S (1982) Primary adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol 13: 301–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim YH, Cho KS, Ha HK, et al. (1999) CT features of torsion of benign cystic teratoma of the ovary. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23: 451–62

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E, Cuenod CA, et al. (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 28: 111–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghossain MA, Hachem K, Buy JN, et al. (2004) Adnexal torsion: magnetic resonance findings in the viable adnexa with emphaisi on stromal ovarian appearance. J Magn Reson Imaging 20: 451–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. (2002) CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics 22: 283–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shukla R (2004) Isolated torsion of the hydrosalpinx: a rare presentation. Br J Radiol 77: 784–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Merlini L, Anooshiravani M, Vunda A, et al. (2008) Noninflammatory fallopian tube pathology in children. Pediatr Radiol 38: 1330–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Orazi C, Inserra A, Lucchetti MC, Schingo PM (2006) Isolated tubal torsion: a rare cause of pelvic pain at menarche. Sonographic and MR findings. Pediatr Radiol 36: 1316–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ohara N, Narita F, Murao S (2003) Isolated torsion of haematosalpinx associated with tubal endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 23: 453–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Goktolga U, Ceyhan T, Ozturk H, et al. (2007) Isolated torsion of fallopian tube in a premenarcheal 12-year-old girl. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33: 215–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Origoni M, Cavoretto P, Conti E, Ferrari A (2009) Isolated tubal torsion in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146: 116–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Frye RE, Ascher SM, Thomasson D (2000) MR hysterosalpingography: protocol development and refinement for simulating normal and abnormal fallopian tube patency-feasibility study with a phantom. Radiology 214: 107–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sadowski EA, Ochsner JE, Riherd JM, et al (2008) MR hysterosalpingography with an angiographic time-resolved 3D pulse sequence: assessment of tubal patency. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191: 1381–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de radiologie — Secteur imagerie de la femme, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France

    A. Jalaguier-Coudray

  2. Service de radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France

    I. Thomassin-Naggara & M. Bazot

Authors
  1. A. Jalaguier-Coudray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Thomassin-Naggara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Bazot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Jalaguier-Coudray .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jalaguier-Coudray, A., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Bazot, M. (2014). Pathologie tubaire. In: IRM du pelvis de l’homme et de la femme. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0428-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0428-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0428-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation