Skip to main content

Traumatologie du membre supérieur du sujet âgé fragile

  • Chapter
  • 751 Accesses

Part of the book series: Approche pratique en orthopédie - traumatologie ((APPRPRAT))

Résumé

La traumatologie du membre supérieur est, par sa fréquence et par le handicap qu’elle engendre, un problème préoccupant chez la personne âgée fragile. L’entrave à la mobilisation complète et indolore du membre supérieur, la perte d’une main pour les gestes de la vie quotidienne, ou l’impossibilité d’utiliser des aides techniques pour la marche, sont des handicaps majeurs pour certains patients, qui vont ainsi perdre leur autonomie, et devront être institutionnalisés, au moins temporairement [1]. Le but du traitement moderne des lésions traumatiques du membre supérieur est certes de restaurer à terme l’autonomie antérieure des patients, mais également de perturber le moins possible leur vie quotidienne, le temps de la consolidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Koval KJ, Meek R, Schemitsch E, et al. (2003) An AOA critical issue. Geriatric trauma: young ideas. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A: 1380–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Finsen V, Benum P (1987) Colles’ fracture as an indicator of increased risk of hip fracture. An epidemiological study. Ann Chir Gynaecol 76: 114–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lips P (1997) Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med 103: 3S–8S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole PA, Wijdicks CA (2007) The operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures. Hand Clin 23: 437–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, et al. (2000) Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82: 478–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutgers M, Ring D (2006) Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma 20: 597–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ring D, Chin K, Taghinia AH, Jupiter JB (2007) Nonunion after functional bracing treatment of diaphyseal humerus fractures. J Trauma 62: 1157–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Decomas A, Kaye J (2010) Risk factors associated with failure of treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures after functional bracing. J La State Med Soc 162: 33–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C (2002) The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11: 143–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simon P, Jobard D, Bistour L, Babin SR (1999) Complications of Marchetti nailing for humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 23: 320–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kobayashi M, Watanabe Y, Matsushita T (2010) Early full of shoulder and elbow motion is possible after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24: 212–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziran BH, Kinney RC, Smith WR, Peacher G (2010) Sub-muscular plating of the humerus: an emerging technique. Injury 41: 1047–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernard De Dompsure R, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P (2010) Uninfected nonunion of the humeral diaphysis: reviews of 21 patients treated by shingling, compression plate, and autologous bone graft. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96: 139–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heineman DJ, Poolman RW, Nork Sean SE, et al. (2010) Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop 81: 216–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee M, Schemtisch EH (2006) Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures — a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 77: 279–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan AS, Afzal W, Anwar A (2010) Comparison of shoulder function, radial nerve palsy and infection after nailing versus plating in humeral shaft fractures. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 20: 253–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T (2007) Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humérus. A randomized controlled study. Int Orthop 31: 391–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta A (1991) The treatment of Colles’ fracture. Immobilisation with the wrist dorsiflexed. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73: 312–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Solgaard S (1986) Early displacement of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 57: 229–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Camelot C, Ramare S, Lemoine J, Saillant G (1998) Traitement orthopédique des fractures de l’extrémité inférieure du radius selon Judet. Rev Chir Orthop 84: 124–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leone J, Bhandari M, Adili A, et al. (2004) Predictors of early and late instability following conservative treatment of extra-articular distal radius fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124: 38–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McQueen M, Caspers J (1988) Colles fracture: does the anatomical result affect the final function? J Bone Joint Surg Br 70: 649–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. MacKenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R (2006) Prediction of instability in distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 1944–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kapandji A (1976) Ostéosynthèse par double embrochage intra-focal. Traitement fonctionnel des fractures non articulaires de l’extrémité inférieure du radius. Ann Chir 30: 903–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cognet JM, Geanah A, Marsal C, et al. (2006) Ostéosynthèse des fractures du radius distal par plaque à vis bloquée. Rev Chir Orthop 92: 663–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nunley JA, Rowan PR (1999) Delayed rupture of the pollicis longus tendon after inappropriate placement of the pie plate on the volar surface of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 24: 1279–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cognet JM, Dujardin C, Popescu A, et al. (2005) Rupture de tendons fléchisseurs sur plaque antérieure après fracture du radius distal. Rev Chir Orthop 91: 476–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Soong M, Van Leerdam R, Guitton TG, et al. (2011) Fracture of the distal radius: risk factors for complications after locked volar plate fixation. J Hand Surg Am Jan 36: 3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Espinosa Gutiérrez A, Moreno Velasquez A (2010) Cost-benefit of various treatments for patients with distal radius fracture. Acta Ortop Mex 24: 61–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Egol KA, Walsh M, Romo-Cardoso S, et al. (2010) Distal radial fractures in the elderly: operative compared with nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92: 1851–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Herzberg G, Yzem Y, Al Saati M, Plotard F (2010) « PAF » analysis of acute distal radius fracture in adults. Preliminary results. Chir Main 29: 231–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sylvain Terver Frédéric Martins-Condé Bernard Leblanc

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, P., Weppe, F. (2013). Traumatologie du membre supérieur du sujet âgé fragile. In: Terver, S., Martins-Condé, F., Leblanc, B. (eds) Orthopédie-traumatologie de la personne âgée fragile. Approche pratique en orthopédie - traumatologie. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0377-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0377-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0376-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0377-7

Publish with us

Policies and ethics