Skip to main content

20 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall: Freedom is the New Common Narrative of Europe

  • Chapter
State of the Union 2010

Abstract

The current feeling of political crisis in the European Union is fuelled by a dual evolution that began in 1989. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the failure of the totalitarian venture, the prospect of accession for Central and Eastern European States to the European Union became an event of prime importance. This evolution very soon became double-edged, however, as the unification of the continent was immediately coupled with anxiety at the time of the break-up of former Yugoslavia. The “end of the story” was accompanied in parallel by a doubt with regard to the future, or, in any case, the feeling that events taking place were totally unique1. It is in this context that the idea of “crisis” developed. In her book Between Past and Future, Hannah Arendt defines the notion of “crisis” as an unprecedented situation, introducing a break from the past that would no longer provide the resources to think of the present and find one’s bearings in the future2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. We can recall the book by F. Fukuyama, La fin de l’histoire et le dernier homme, Paris, Flammarion, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Arendt, Between Past and Future (1954). It is also useful to read the article by C. Lefort, “L’imaginaire de la crise”, in Commentaire, no. 79, autumn 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. It is important to specify that such a feeling undoubtedly varies among the different Member States and the diversity of national public opinions, at least among the majority of States that form the historic core of European integration and countries recently emerged from communism.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. L. Cohen-Tanugi, “The End of Europe?” in Foreign Affairs, Nov-Dec, no. 6, Vol. 84, 2005–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. It seems to us that the European Union can be examined based on the concept of “impolitic democracy” that we have borrowed from P. Rosanvallon. Cf. La contre-démocratie. La politique à l’âge de la défiance, Paris, Le Seuil, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. M. Foucher, “Peut-on vivre sans frontières?” in N. Gnesotto and M. Rocard (dir.), Notre Europe, Paris, Robert Laffont, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For recent analysis on this point, cf. M. Foucher, L’Europe et l’avenir du monde, Paris, Odile Jacob, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. We refer to the article by K. Nicolaïdis and J. Pélabay, “Comment raconter l’Europe tout en prenant la diversité narrative au sérieux?” in Raison publique, no. 7, Paris, Presses universitaires de la Sorbonne, 2007, p. 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  9. We have further developed this point elsewhere and we would like to refer you to C. Lequesne, La France dans la nouvelle Europe. Assumer le changement d’échelle, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 2008 and to T. Chopin, France-Europe. Le bal des hypocrites, Paris, Saint-Simon, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. As an illustration, see J.-L. Bourlanges, “L’Europe fait semblant” in Le Monde, 1st December 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See C. Lequesne, “La génération de la dissidence, l’idée européenne et la divergence transatlantique,” Esprit, October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. B. Manin, “Les deux libéralismes: marché ou contre-pouvoirs,” in Intervention, no. 9, May-July 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. T. Chopin, “La France, L’Europe et le libéralisme,” in Commentaire, no. 115, autumn 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. P. Hassner, “Ni sang ni sol? Crise de l’Europe et dialectique de la territorialité” (1996), text also features in La terreur et l’empire, Paris, Le Seuil, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. On this point we can refer to D. Cohen, La prospérité du vice. Introduction inquiète à l’économie, Paris, Albin Michel, 2009, chap. IX, “La fin des solidarités”.

    Google Scholar 

  16. This demand can be found at the heart of political liberalism and the work of Benjamin Constant, for example, can convince us of this.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Hassner, «L’Europe et le spectre des nationalismes», Esprit, october 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Siedentop, “A crisis of Legitimacy”, in Prospect, july 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Siedentop, Democracy in Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chopin, T., Lequesne, C. (2010). 20 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall: Freedom is the New Common Narrative of Europe. In: State of the Union 2010. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0175-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics