Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Cancer du sein avancé pp 85–94Cite as

Place de l’imagerie dans le bilan d’extension et l’évaluation de la réponse thérapeutique des cancers du sein

  • Chapter

  • 232 Accesses

Abstrait

Le bilan d’extension d’un cancer du sein a pour but de définir son extension locale, régionale et générale apparente basée sur la clinique (et l’imagerie) ou sur des constatations anatomo-pathologiques. Il permet de préciser les facteurs pronostiques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Henderson IC, Patek AJ (1998) The relationship between prognostic and predictive factors in the management of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 52: 261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith M, Allison K, Shaw de Paredes E (2006) Nonmammographic evaluation of the extent of breast carcinoma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 27: 308–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coombs NJ, Boyages J (2005) Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: does each focus matter? J Clin Oncol 23: 7497–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andea AA, Bouwman D, Wallis T, Visscher DW (2004) Correlation of tumor volume and surface area with lymph node status in patients with multifocal/multicentric breast carcinoma. Cancer 100: 20–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al. (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233: 830–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR et al. (2006) Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radio 60: 398–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkinson LS, Given-Wilson R, Hall T et al. (2005) Increasing the diagnosis of multifocal primary breast cancer by the use of bilateral whole-breast ultrasound. Clin Radiol 60: 573–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sobin LH, Greene FL (2004) Multifocal/multicentric breast carcinoma. Cancer 100: 2488–9 (author reply 2489)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung YC, Chen SC, Hsieh IC et al. (2006) Multidetector computed tomography assessment on tumor size and nodal status in patients with locally advanced breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 32: 1186–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liberman L (2006) Breast MR imaging in assessing extent of disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14: 399–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taourel P (2006) IRM et seins denses. Livre des résumés SOFMIS 2006 « Innovations technologiques et bonnes pratiques en sénologie — Dépistage, diagnostic, traitements ». Clermont-Ferrand, 1–3 juin 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al. (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. Am J Roentgenol 183: 1149–57

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blair S, McElroy M, Middleton MS et al. (2006) The efficacy of breast MRI in predicting breast conservation therapy. J Surg Oncol 94: 200–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Goethem M, Tjalma W, Schelfout K et al. (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 32: 901–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG (2006) Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J Okla State Med Assoc 99: 505–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F et al. (2004) The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14: 1725–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boetes C, Veltman J, van Die L et al. (2004) The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 86: 31–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Balu-Maestro C, Chapellier C, Carrier P et al. (2005) Imagerie dans le bilan d’extension ganglionnaire et métastatique du cancer du sein. J Radiol 86: 1649–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sloka JS, Hollett PD, Mathews M (2007) A quantitative review of the use of FDG-PET in the axillary staging of breast cancer. Med Sci Monit 13: RA37–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benson JR, Querci Della Rovere G (2007) Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer. Breast 16: 130–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alvarez S, Anorbe E, Alcorta P et al. (2006) Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. Am J Roentgenol 186: 1342–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar R, Zhuang H, Schall M et al. (2006) FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun 27: 231–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lumachi F, Tregnaghi A, Ferretti G et al. (2006) Accuracy of ultrasonography and 99mTcsestamibi scintimammography for assessing axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. A prospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 32: 933–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamagami T, Yuen S, Sawai K, Nishimura T (2004) MR imaging-guided axillary node biopsy for breast cancer: initial findings. Eur Radiol 14: 151–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chung A, Liou D, Karlan S et al. (2006) Preoperative FDG-PET for axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer. Arch Surg 141: 783–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Memarsadegni M, Riedl CC, Kaneider A et al. (2006) Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast carcinomas: assessment with nonenhanced versus uspio-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 241: 367–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stardards, Options et Recommandations (SOR) (2001) Cancer du sein infiltrants non métastatiques (2e édition, mise à jour). Férération nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer. Montrouge, John Libbey Eurotext

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weir L, Worsley D, Bernstein V (2005) The value of FDG positron emission tomography in the management of patients with breast cancer. Breast J 11: 204–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mavi A, Urhan M, Yu JQ et al. (2006) Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging detects breast cancer with high sensitivity and correlates well with histologic subtypes. J Nucl Med 47: 1440–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cardillo A, De Cicco C, Paganelli G et al. (2007) Role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging of patients with breast cancer candidated to surgery. Ann Oncol 18: 394–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kasem AR, Desai A, Daniell S, Sinha P (2006) Bone scan and liver ultrasound scan in the preoperative staging for primary breast cancer. Breast J 12: 544–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fortunato L, Baldi A, Farina M et al. (2006) Bone marrow and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: from staging to ultrastaging ? J Exp Clin Cancer Res 25: 487–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Omoto K, Hozumi Y, Omoto Y et al. (2006) Sentinel node detection in breast cancer using contrast-enhanced sonography with 25% albumin-Initial clinical experience. J Clin Ultrasound 34: 317–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Husarik DB, Steinert HC (2007) Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for sentinel node mapping in breast cancer. Semin Nucl Med 37: 29–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rouesse J, Alberini JL, Wartski M et al. (2005) Tomographie par émission de positons (TEP) au FDG et cancer du sein. Bull Acad Natl Med 189: 963–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tardivon AA, Ollivier L, El Khoury C, Thibault F (2006) Monitoring therapeutic efficacy in breast carcinomas. Eur Radiol 16: 2549–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Helvie MA, Joynt LK, Cody RL et al. (1996) Locally advanced breast carcinoma: accuracy of mammography vs clinical examination in the prediction of residual disease after chemotherapy. Radiology 198: 327–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Huber S, Wagner M, Zuna I et al. (2000) Locally advanced breast carcinoma: evaluation of mammography in the prediction of residual disease after induction chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 20: 553–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Taïeb S, Kinkel K, Ceugnart L (2007) IRM du sein traité. Imagerie de la femme 17: 5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Padhani AR, Hayes C, Assersohn L et al. (2006) Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical results. Radiology 239: 361–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Partridge SC, Gibbs JE, Lu Y et al. (2005) MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. Am J Roentgenol 184: 1774–81

    Google Scholar 

  42. Frei KA, Kinkel K, Bonel HM et al. (2000) MR imaging of the breast in patients with positive margins after lumpectomy: influence of the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 175: 1577–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hwang ES, Kinkel K, Esserman LJ et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol 10: 381–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schlegel A, Beck R et al. (1993) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16: 891–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de radiodiagnostic, Centre Alexis Vautrin, 54511, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy cedex

    J. Stines & P. Troufléau

Authors
  1. J. Stines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Troufléau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stines, J., Troufléau, P. (2007). Place de l’imagerie dans le bilan d’extension et l’évaluation de la réponse thérapeutique des cancers du sein. In: Cancer du sein avancé. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-72615-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-72615-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-72614-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-72615-6

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation