Skip to main content

Abstract

The configurations and the mathematical content of the propositions, as well as the argumentative means, are reminiscent of pre-Euclidean mathematics, as exemplified in the Hippocrates fragment 1: circles with inscribed triangles, geometry of the circle (presented in III/IV of the Elements), and argumentation via congruent angles in extended configurations. All this gives Props. 11 and 12 an old-fashioned character. On the other hand, no sources are known for Props. 11 and 12. Language and style show no signs of archaism. Props. 11 and 12 were probably constructed by Pappus. What was their purpose? They could be an illustration of what the operation with the technique of analysis-synthesis originally looked like. For Prop. 12, this surely is the case, whereas the situation is less clear for Prop. 11, and only a tentative thesis can be formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the Hippocrates fragment see Simpl. in Phys. 61–68 Diels, Heath (1921, Vol. I, p. 183 and pp.195–196), Knorr (1986, pp. 32–34), and Netz (2004).

  2. 2.

    Prop. 12 has been read this way by Mahoney (1968), e.g.

  3. 3.

    See the introduction to Props. 4–12.

  4. 4.

    For a very different assessment, cf. Mahoney (1968).

  5. 5.

    Note that the resolutio is minimal here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sefrin-Weis, H. (2010). Plane Geometry, Archaic Style. In: Sefrin-Weis, H. (eds) Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection . Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-005-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics