Abstract
In recent years, we have experienced the rise of so-called Web 2.0 applications, in which a large number of users voluntarily engage in collaborative work. The characteristics of Web 2.0 can be best described as an “architecture of participation” (O’Reilly 2005), which includes simplicity of usage, immediate feedback on UI and structural level, and valuing each user’s contributions (Grudin 2006; Kittur et al. 2007). Web 2.0 orchestrates available technology in a way that encourages users to participate actively as its architecture of participation helps to balance effort and benefit even in work-related settings. The success of these applications – e.g., Wikis, Word Processors on the Web, or Social Tagging systems – supports this point of view. This immediately leads to the question whether Web 2.0 applications are the new generation of collaboration support systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See (Millen et al. 2007) for an example on how social bookmarking services can be applied to improve search for information sources and social navigation in a corporate environment.
- 2.
It should be noted that some types of Web 2.0 applications such as Social Networking provide sufficient awareness support, whereas such support has to be improved in, e.g., Social Tagging and Applications on the Web.
- 3.
Google docs & spreadsheets provide an online word processor (http://docs.google.com).
- 4.
The “WikiWikiWeb” is still alive and can be found at Ward Cunningham’s company web site (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiWikiWeb).
- 5.
The Wikipedia Foundation provides online encyclopedias in a multitude of languages and is nowadys one of the most popular sites on the web (http://wikipedia.org).
- 6.
Delicious is a tagging sites managing bookmarks of users (http://delicious.com).
- 7.
The Flickr tagging service manages photographs of users (http://flickr.com).
- 8.
Flickr started out as a typical narrow tagging mechanism. Nowadays, a user’s friends are also allowed to assign tags to his or her content. However, this still differs from the situation of broad tagging.
- 9.
CiteULike and Bibsonomy offer tagging for scientific resources such as articles and papers (http://www.citeulike.org, http://bibsonomy.org).
- 10.
While Gamma et al. (1995) made patterns popular, in the context of this chapter it should be noticed that the motiviation for the above-mentioned “WikiWikiWeb” was to provide a design pattern respository and discussion space.
- 11.
A huge choice of patterns related tot he field of HCI can be seen at, e.g., http://www.hcipatterns.org/patterns.html.
- 12.
It should be noticed, however, that there are existing approaches allowing for, e.g., content editing such as GROVE (Ellis et al. 2006), but these do not include the full set offered by secondary tools such as word processors.
- 13.
Netvibes is a portal that is capable of hosting a user-defined collection of widgets (http://netvibes.com).
References
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
Ames, M., Naaman, M. (2007). Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. pp 971–980.
Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch.
Baecker, R. (1993). Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Assisting Human-Human Collaboration. Morgan Kaufmann.
Borchers, J. (2001). A pattern approach to interaction design. AI & Society 15. 359–376.
Cattuto, C., Loreto, V. and Pietronero, L. (2007). Collaborative Tagging and Semiotic Dynamics. PNAS 104. pp 1461–1464
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Damianos, L., Griffith, J., Cuomo, D., Hirst, D. and Smallwood, J. (2006). Onomi: Social Bookmarking on a Corporate Intranet. Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Davenport, T. (2005). Thinking for a living. Harvard Business School Press.
Desilets, A., Paquet, S. and Vinson, N.G. (2005). Are wikis usable? In: WikiSym ‘05: Proceedings of the 2005 international symposium on Wikis. New York: ACM Press
Ellis, C., Simon, J. and Rein, G. (2006). Groupware: some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM 34. 39–58.
Erickson, T. (2006). From PIM to GIM: personal information management in group contexts. Communications of the ACM 49(1). 74–75.
Farrell, S., Lau, T., Wilcox, E., Nusser, S. and Muller, M. (2007). Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging. UIST ‘07: Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. New York: ACM Press.
Fincher, S. and Utting, I. (2002). Pedagogical patterns: Their place in the genre. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiSCE’02). Aarhus, Denmark.
Forte, A. and Bruckman, A. (2005). Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing. GROUP 5 workshop. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~aforte/
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Boston, MA.: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
Gladwell, M. (2000). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little, Brown and Company.
Golder, S. and Huberman, B. (2006). The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science. 198–208
Gomez-Perez, A. and Fernandez-Lopez, M.: (2004). Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, E-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer.
Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5. 199–220.
Grudin, J. (2006). Enterprise Knowledge Management and Emerging Technologies. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006. HICSS’06
Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW Applications fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of organizational Interfaces. Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press. pp 85–93.
Happel, H., Treitz, M. (2008). Proliferation in enterprise wikis. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP 08). Carry-le-Rouet, France
Heath, B.P., McArthur, D.J., McClelland, M.K. and Vetter, R.J. (2005). Metadata lessons from the iLumina digital library. Commun. ACM 48. 68–74.
Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Jahnke, I., Kienle, A., Kunau, G., Loser, K., and Menold, N. (2003). Concepts for usable patterns of groupware applications. Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. New York: ACM Press.
Jorgensen, C. (2007). Image Access, the Semantic Gap, and Social Tagging as a Paradigm Shift. Proceedings 18th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B., Suh, B. and Mytkowicz, T. (2007). Power of the Few vs. Wisdom of the Crowd: Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie. World Wide Web 1
Leuf, B. and Cunningham, W. (2001). The Wiki way. Addison-Wesley
Mark, G. and Poltrock, S. (2003). Shaping technology across social worlds: groupware adoption in a distributed organization. GROUP ‘03: Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. New York: ACM press.
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D. and Davis, M. (2006). HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. pp 31–40.
Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Computer Mediated Communication, LIS590CMC (Doctoral Seminar), Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, December.
McAfee, A. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review 47. 21–28.
Millen, D., Yang, M., Whittaker, S. and Feinberg, J. (2007). Social bookmarking and exploratory search. In: Bannon, L., Wagner, I., Gutwin, C., Harper, R. Schmidt, K. (eds.) ECSCW’07: Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer.
Nov, O. (2007). What motivates Wikipedians?. Commun. ACM 50. 60–64
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series
Prilla, M. (2008). Semantic Integration of Process Models into Knowledge Management: A Social Tagging Approach. Proceedings of BIS 08.
Prilla, M., Herrmann, T. (2007) Semantically Integrating Heterogeneous Content: Applying Social Tagging as a Knowledge Management Tool for Process Model Development and Usage. Proceedings of IKNOW ‚07.
Prilla, M., Ritterskamp, C. (2007). Kolumbus 2 Co-Writer: The Next Step in Collaborative Writing. ECSCW 2007 (Demo.)
Prilla, M., Ritterskamp, C. (2006). Collaboration Support by Co-Ownership of Documents. In: Hassanaly, P., Herrmann, T., Kunau, G. Zacklad, M. (eds.) Cooperative Systems Design. Seamless Integration of Artifacts and Conversations – Enhanced Concepts of Infrastructure for Communication: Proceedings of COOP 2006. IOS Press.
Prinz, W., Hinrichs, E. and Kireyev, I. (2008). Anticipative Awareness in a Groupware System. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP ‘08) Carry-Le-Rouet. France.
Redmiles, D., van der Hoek, A., Al-Ani, B., Hildenbrand, T., Quirk, S., Sarma, A., Silveira, R., Filho, S., De Souza, C. and Trainer, E. (2007). Continuous coordination a new paradigm to support globally distributed software development projects. Wirtschaftsinformatik 49. 28–38.
Richardson, L., Ruby, S. (2007). RESTful Web Services. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Rivadeneira, A.W., Gruen, D.M., Muller, M.J. and Millen, D.R. (2007). Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds. In Rosson, M. B., Gilmore, D. J. (eds.) Proceedings of CHI. New York: ACM Press.
Schümmer, T. and Lukosch, S. (2007). Patterns for Computer-Mediated Interaction. John Wiley & Sons.
Tapscott, D., and Williams, A. (2006). Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything. Portfolio.
Trant, J. (2006). Social classification and folksonomy in art museums: Early data from the steve. museum tagger prototype. Proceedings of the 17th SIG Classification Research Workshop
Viégas, F. (2007). The Visual Side of Wikipedia. Proceedings of Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences (HICCS’07)
Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M. and Kushel, D. (2004). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems. pp 575-582
Acknowledgments
This work has benefited from and was inspired by the contributions of others. We would like to thank all members of IMTM at the University of Bochum and the student groups who contributed to the Co-Writer and Tagging prototypes. Special thanks go to the K2 development team, namely Peter Schyma and Gergana Nalbantova, for their efforts in integrating all the ideas mentioned in this paper into the system.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prilla, M., Ritterskamp, C. (2010). The Interplay of Web 2.0 and Collaboration Support Systems: Leveraging Synergies. In: Randall, D., Salembier, P. (eds) From CSCW to Web 2.0: European Developments in Collaborative Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-965-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-965-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-964-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-965-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)