Abstract
The concept of moduli space was introduced by Riemann in his study of the conformal (or equivalently, complex) structures on a Riemann surface. Let us consider the simplest non-trivial case, namely, that of a Riemann surface of genus 1 or the torus T 2. The set of all complex structures \(\mathcal{C}({T}^{2})\) on the torus is an infinite-dimensional space acted on by the infinite-dimensional group Diff(T 2). The quotient space
is the moduli space of complex structures on T 2. Since T 2 with a given complex structure defines an elliptic curve, \(\mathcal{M}({T}^{2})\) is, in fact, the moduli space of elliptic curves. It is well known that a point ω = ω1 + iω2 in the upper half-plane H (ω2 > 0) determines a complex structure and is called the modulus of the corresponding elliptic curve. The modular group SL(2, Z) acts on H by modular transformations and we can identify \(\mathcal{M}({T}^{2})\) with H ∕ SL(2, Z). This is the reason for calling \(\mathcal{M}({T}^{2})\) the space of moduli of elliptic curves or simply the moduli space. The topology and geometry of the moduli space has rich structure. The natural boundary ω2 = 0 of the upper half plane corresponds to singular structures. Several important aspects of this classical example are also found in the moduli spaces of other geometric structures. Typically, there is an infinite-dimensional group acting on an infinite-dimensional space of geometric structures with quotient a “nice space” (for example, a finite-dimensional manifold with singularities). For a general discussion of moduli spaces arising in various applications see, for example, [193].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Taubes described what happened after the lecture: Several people working in geometric topology gathered at Bott’s house. Most of us were thinking of obtaining a counterexample to Witten’s assertion of equivalence of the monopole and instanton invariants. No such example was found by the time we broke up late that night. It was agreed that anyone who finds a counterexample would communicate it to the others. (Personal communication)
- 2.
Gromov made this remark after the seminar by Mrówka at Columbia University explaining this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marathe, K. (2010). 4-Manifold Invariants. In: Topics in Physical Mathematics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-939-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-939-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-938-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-939-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)