Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transitioning from Open to Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Look Back

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Urologic Surgery

  • 908 Accesses

Abstract

It is never easy for an already experienced surgeon to take on a new procedure and sooner or later thereafter to relive their forgotten (or suppressed!) anxieties from their early experience. In this chapter, two open surgeons reflect on their transition to robotic surgery, one (TA)in the early stages of the development of the procedure and the other (LG) in the more recent times. We will focus on the learning curve as it applies to an experienced open surgeon and provide a frank and honest discussion of the challenges involved, as well as provide tips and tricks in the early and late part of the transition. Although it may be intuitive that it is “easier” for a very experienced open surgeon to transition to the technologic and surgical steps of the robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP) than to pure laparoscopy, that does not mean that it is an “easy” technique to learn. We hope that this chapter will enable the transitioning open surgeon, to learn from our experiences and ease his/her “console anxiety.” Some techniques that have been developed by us and others will be discussed for the “refinement” stages of the learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Vancaille T. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1992;147:246; abstract 130.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50(6):854-857.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol. 2000;163(2):418-422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology. 2000;55(5):630-634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kouvoussi LR, Schuessler WW, Vancaille TG, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic approach to the seminal vesicles. J Urol. 1993;150:417-419.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168(3):945-949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: “the single knot method”. Urology. 2003;61:699-702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee DI, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738-1741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu JC, Hevelone ND, Ferreira MD, et al. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003–2005. Urology. 2008;180:1969-1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2278-2284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;54:785-793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pick D, Lee DI, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Anatomic port placement for the robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2004;18:572-575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee DI, Eichel L, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a single assistant. Urology. 2004;63:1172-1175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards R, Lee D, Skarecky DW. Robotic radical prostatectomy: is elimination of pT2 positive margins possible? Urology. 2004;64:1224-1228; +video.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Borin J, Skarecky DW, Narula N, Ahlering TE. The impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Urology. 2007;70:173-177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Struder UE, Walther PJ, Porter AT, Benson RC. Workshop summary: approaches to radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 1993;24:44-45.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Finley DS, Deane L, Rodriguez E, et al. Anterior prostatic fat: anatomic and pathologic basis for complete dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2007;70:1000-1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeong J, Lambda S, Ercolani M, Kim I. Staging implications of anterior prostatic fat pad excision during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(suppl 1):MP 15-MP 12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yee D, Narula N, Amin M, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: current evaluation of surgical margins in clinically low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Endourol. 2009;23:1461-1465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eichel L, Chou D, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Feasibility study for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy cautery free neurovascular bundle preservation. Urology. 2005;65(5):994-998; +video.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gill IS, Ukimura O, Rubinstein M, et al. Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: refined technique. Urology. 2005;65(5):23-27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Skarecky DW. Rapid communication: early potency with cautery free neurovascular bundle preservation study with robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2005;19:715-718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Skarecky DW. Evaluation of long-term thermal injury using cautery during nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72:1371-1374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seddon HJ. A review of work on peripheral nerve injuries in Great Britain during World War II. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1948;108:160-168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahlering TE, Kaplan AG, Yee D, Skarecky DW. Prostate weight and early potency in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72:1263-1268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Finley D, Rodriguez E, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of potency recovery following unilateral nerve sparing prostatectomy (RALP). BJU Int. 2009;104:1484-1489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2007;51:45-56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mulhall JP. The role and structure of a postradical prostatectomy penile rehabilitation program. Curr Urol Rep. 2009;10:219-225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liss MA, Osann K, Canvasser N, Chu W, Chang A, Gan J, Li R, Santos R, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE, Negative impact on urinary quality of life based on security or 1 pad versus 0 pads status following radical prostatectomy-an evaluation of patient-reported validated questionnaires. J Urol. 2010; 183(4):1464-1468.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel MB, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int. 2009;104:1428-1435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahlering TE, Patel V, Lee DI, Skarecky DW. Multi-institutional review of complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RLP). J Endourol. 2006;20(suppl 1):VP8-11.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2008;180:1018-1023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pick D, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Continence after robotic prostatectomy: the impact of nerve sparing technique. J Urol. 2008;179(4):A1498: page 510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stricker P. Ethical introduction of robotic surgery for an experienced open surgeon. J Robot Surg. 2008;2:127.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Subramonian K, Muir G. The “learning curve” in surgery: what is it, how do we measure it and can we influence it? BJU Int. 2004;93:1173-1174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1171-1177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nilsson AE, Carlsson S, Jonsson M, Haendler L, Wiklund NP. Learning curve concerning positive surgical margins for second generation surgeons for RALP. J Robot Surg. 2008;2:109.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Albani JM, Lee DI. Transperitoneal trocar placement. In: Patel VR, ed. Robotic Urologic Surgery. 1st ed. London: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UBC Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    S. Larry Goldenberg C.M., O.B.C., M.D., F.R.C.S.C., F.A.C.S., D.A.B.U., F.C.A.H.S.

  2. Department of Urology, University of California Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA

    Thomas E. Ahlering M.D.

  3. Department of Urologic Sciences Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Nicholas C. Buchan M.B.Ch.B.

  4. Department of Urology, University of California Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA

    Douglas W. Skarecky B.S.

Authors
  1. S. Larry Goldenberg C.M., O.B.C., M.D., F.R.C.S.C., F.A.C.S., D.A.B.U., F.C.A.H.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas E. Ahlering M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicholas C. Buchan M.B.Ch.B.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Douglas W. Skarecky B.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Florida Hospital Celebration Health, Global Robotics Institute, Celebration Place 410, Celebration, 34747, Florida, USA

    Vipul R. Patel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldenberg, S.L., Ahlering, T.E., Buchan, N.C., Skarecky, D.W. (2011). Transitioning from Open to Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Look Back. In: Patel, V. (eds) Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-799-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-800-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation