Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Green Energy pp 123–179Cite as

Co-combustion and Gasification of Coal and Cattle Biomass: a Review of Research and Experimentation

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Progress in Green Energy ((PGE,volume 1))

Abstract

Large confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), including cattle feedlots and dairies, have been cited as major point sources for air, soil, and water pollution. Subsequent land application of manure solids and the usage of liquid manure (> 90 % moisture) as irrigation water on nearby crop fields have been sited as non-point sources for soil and water pollution, particularly with respect to phosphorus overloading in local watersheds and streams [1]. For example, annual average phosphorus concentrations in the North Bosque River Watershed, in Texas, USA are limited to between 15 and 50 μg/L [2]. American Agriculture has become an increasingly mechanized and specialized system capable of growing more food on less land. Consequently, many smaller, family oriented farms that tended to grow a variety of crops and keep a diverse population of animals have disappeared. In order to stay competitive, most farmers have had to specialize in one or two crops or keep many of one type of animal. Growing single monocultures and keeping one animal type allows farms to produce more food, more efficiently [3–5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McFarland A, Millican J. Assessment of preexisting and post-implementation effects for the North Bosque River Watershed: Clean Water Act section 319 report. Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research (TiAER), Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas. Available online at: http://www.tiaer.tarleton.edu. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. TNRCC. Two total maximum daily loads for phosphorus in the North Bosque River: for segments 1226 and 1255. Prepared by the Strategic Assessment Division of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Centner TJ. Empty pastures: confined animals and the transformation of the rural landscape. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keplinger K, Tanter A, Hauck L. Manure transportation and application: model development and a general application. Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research (TiAER), Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas. Available online at: http://www.tiaer.tarleton.edu. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. NASS. U.S. dairy herd structure: large operations increase share of milk production. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Available online at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/livestock/dairy-herd/specda02.pdf. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Probstein RF, Hicks RE (2006b). Synthetic fuels, Chapter 8: Biomass conversion. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Probstein RF, Hicks RE. Synthetic fuels, Chapter 4: Gas from coal. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. NASS. Cattle on feed: US cattle on feed down 5 percent, August 2007. National Agricultural Statistics Service of the United States Department of Agriculture. Available online at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/CattOnFe/CattOnFe-08-17-2007.pdf. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harman WL. Pen cleaning costs for dust control, Southern Great Plains feedlots. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, BRC Report No. 04-01, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DPI&F. Feedlot waste management series: manure production data. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries. Government of Queensland, Australia. Available online at: http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/environment/5166.html. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. CDFA. California dairy facts. California Dairy Research Foundation of the California Department of Food and Agriculture. Available online at: http://www.cdrf.org. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt GH, Van Vleck LD, Hutjens MF. Principles of dairy science, second edition, Chapter 27: Dairy cattle housing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. USDA. Economics, statistics, and market information system. United States Department of Agriculture. Available online at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osei E, Gassman PW, Jones RD, Pratt SJ, Hauck LM, Beran WD, et al. Economic and environmental impacts of alternative practices on dairy farms in an agricultural watershed. J Soil Water Conservation 2000;55(4):466–472.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sweeten JM. Texas Agricultural Extension Service Publication L-1094. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mukhtar S. Proper lagoon management to reduce odor and excessive sludge accumulation. Texas A&M University, Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Available online at: http://tammi.tamu.edu/pdf%20pubs/lagoonmanagement.pdf. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sweeten JM, Annamalai K, Thien B, McDonald L. Co-firing of coal and cattle feedlot biomass (FB) fuels, Part I: feedlot biomass (cattle manure) fuel quality and characteristics. Fuel 2003;82(10):1167–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez P, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM. Effects of drying on heating values of biomass. Soc Agric Trans 1998;41:1083–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Annamalai K, Ishwar P. Combustion science and engineering. Orlando, FL: Taylor and Francis, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Ramalingam SC. Estimation of the gross heating values of biomass fuels. Trans Soc Agric Eng 1987;30:1205–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carlin NT. Thermo-chemical conversion of dairy waste based biomass through direct firing. MS Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martin B, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Heflin K. Pyrolysis, ignition, and fuel characteristics of coal, feedlot biomass, and coal:feedlot biomass blends. Submitted to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Raman P, Walawender WP, Fan LT, Howell JA. Thermogravimetric analysis of biomass. Devolatilization studies on feedlot manure. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 1981; 20:630−636.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Global Energy Decisions. Coal view interactive: short-term forecast for 16 coals. Available online at: http://www.globalenergy.com. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  25. TAMU Fuel Data Bank. Texas A&M University Coal and Biomass Energy Laboratory. Available online at: http://www1.mengr.tamu.edu/REL/TAMU%20FDB.htm. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Arcot Vijayasarathy U. Mercury emission control for coal fired power plants using coal and biomass. MS Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  27. DOE. Clean coal technology: reburning technologies for the control of nitrogen oxides emissions from coal-fired boilers. United States Department of Energy Topical Report Number 14. 1999. Available online at: http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/publications.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Srivastava RK, Hall RE, Khan S, Culligan K, Lani BW. Nitrogen oxides emissions control options for coal-fired electric utility boilers. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2005; 55:1367−1388.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pacala S, Socolow R. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Sci Mag 2004;305:968–972.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Di Nola G. Biomass fuel characterization for NOx emissions in co-firing applications. Doctoral Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  31. EIA. US carbon dioxide emissions from energy sources 2006 flash estimate. Energy Information Administration. Available online at: http://www.eia.doe.gov. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Annamalai K, Priyadarsan S, Arumugam S, Sweeten JM. Energy conversion: principles for coal, animal waste, and biomass fuels. Encyclopedia Energy Eng Technol 2007; 1(1):476−497.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wen Z, Frear C, Chen S. Anaerobic digestion of liquid dairy manure using a sequential continuous-stirred tank reactor system. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2007;82:758–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kohl A, Riesenfeld F. Gas Purification, 2nd edn. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Co., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Krich K, Augenstein D, Batmale JP, Benemann J, Rutledge B, Salour D. Biomethane from dairy waste: a sourcebook for the production and use of renewable natural gas in California. Prepared for The Western United Dairymen, Funded in part through USDA Rural Development, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Monnet F. An introduction to anaerobic digestion of organic wastes: final report, 2003. Remade Scotland. Available online at: http://www.remade.org.uk/Organics/organics_documents/IntroAnaerobicDigestion.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ghaly AE. A comparative study of anaerobic digestion of acid cheese whey and dairy manure in a two-stage reactor. Bioresource Technol 1996;58:61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen YR, Varel VH, Hashimoto AG. Chemicals from cellulosic materials. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 1980;19:471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. USEPA. Guide to operational systems: U.S. operating digesters by state. The AgSTAR program of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Last update November 2. Available online at: http://epa.gov/agstar/operation/bystate.html. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Associated Press. Texas plant uses dairy waste to make natural gas. By Brown AK, Associated Press Writer. The Associated Press State and Local Wire, Business News Section, November 5, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Goodrich PR, Schmidt D, Haubenschild D. Anaerobic digestion for energy and pollution control. Agric Eng Int: the CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript EE 03 001, Volume VII, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Meyer D. Digesters on the farm: making electricity from manure. BioCycle: J Composting Organics Recycling 2003;44(1):52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chang FH. Energy and sustainability comparisons of anaerobic digestion and thermal technologies for processing animal waste. 2004 ASAE/CSAE Annual International Meeting, Fairmont Chateau Laurier, The Westin, Government Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Simons G, Zhang Z. California continues push for dairy power. BioCycle: J Composting Organics Recycling 2003;44(7):63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hotchkiss R. Coal gasification technologies. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A, J Power Energy 2003;217(A1):27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Howard-Smith I. Coal conversion technology. Noyes Data Corporation/Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nowacki P. Coal gasification processes. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, New Jersey, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Quaak P, Knoef H, Stassen H. Energy from biomass: a review of combustion and gasification technologies. World Bank Technical Paper No. 422, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Young L, Pian CCP. High-temperature, air-blown gasification of dairy-farm wastes for energy production. Energy 2003;28:655–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Skill Associates. ElimanureTM . Available online at: http://www.burnmanure.com/management/elimanure.html. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sami M, Annamalai K, Wooldridge M. Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2001;27:171–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Priyadarsan S, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Holtzapple M. Co-gasification of blended coal with feedlot and chicken litter biomass. Proc Combust Inst 2005;30:2973–2980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sweeten JM, Korenberg J, LePori WA, Annamalai K, Parnell CB. Combustion of cattle feedlot manure for energy production. Energy in Agric 1986;5:55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Annamalai K, Ibrahim MY, and Sweeten JM. Experimental studies on combustion of cattle manure in a fluidized bed combustor. J Energy Res Technol 1987;109:49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Raman P, Walawender WP, Fan LT, Chang CC. Mathematical model for the fluid-bed gasification of biomass materials. Application to feedlot manure. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 1981;20:686–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Panda Ethanol Inc. Manure gasification: using renewable fuel to create renewable fuel. Available online at: http://pandaethanol.com/gas/index.html. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Megel AJ, DeOtte RE, Robinson CA. Investigation of economically viable coproducts developed from ash from the combustion of manure. 2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Minneapolis Convention Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Priyadarsan S, Annamalai K, Thien B, Sweeten JM, Mukhtar S. Animal waste as a source of renewable energy. In Outlaw JL, Collins KJ, Duffield JA (eds), Chapter 16 of the USDA-Source Book on Animal Waste as a Source of Renewable Energy, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  59. NASA. Chemical equilibrium with applications (CEA), chemical equilibrium computer program. Curator: Chao MM. Last updated on January 17, 2007. Available online at: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/CEAWeb/. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gordillo G, Annamalai K, Arcot VU. Gasification of coal and animal waste using an airsteam mixture as oxidizing agent. 19th National and 8th ISHMT-ASME, Heat and Mass Transfer Conference, JNTU Hyderabad, India, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Priyadarsan S. Fixed bed gasification studies on coal-feedlot biomass and coal-chicken litter biomass under batch mode operation. MS Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Priyadarsan S, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Mukhtar S, Holtzapple MT. Fixed bed gasification of feedlot and poultry litter biomass. Trans ASAE 2005;47(5):1689–1696.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Frazzitta S, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM. Performance of a burner with coal and coal:feedlot manure blends. J Propul Power 1999;15:181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Arumugam S, Annamalai K, Thien B, Sweeten JM. Feedlot biomass co-firing: a renewable energy alternative for coal-fired utilities. Int J Green Energy 2005;2:409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Mukhtar S, Thien B, Wei G, Priyadarsan S. Co-firing coal: feedlot and litter biomass (CFB and CLB) fuels in pulverized fuel and fixed bed burners. Final Department of Energy Report. DOE-Pittsburgh Contract #40810, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Annamalai K, Thien B, Sweeten JM. Co-firing of coal and cattle feedlot biomass (FB) fuels, Part II: performance results from 100,000 Btu/hr laboratory scale boiler burner. Fuel 2003;82(10):1183–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Thomas N, Lucht A, Lucht RP, Priyadarsan S, Annamalai K, Caton JA. In situ measurements of nitric oxide in coal-combustion exhaust using a sensor based on a widely-tunable external-cavity GaN diode laser. J Appl Optics 2006;46(19):3946–3957.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Freeman M, Mathur M, O’Dowd W, Walbert G, et al. Co-firing of coal and cattle feedlot biomass (FB) fuels, Part III: fouling results from a 500,000 Btu/hr pilot plant scale boiler burner. Fuel 2003;82(10):1195–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Annamalai K, Sweeten JM. Reburn system with feedlot biomass. US Patent #6,973,883 B1, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lawrence BD. Co-firing of coal and dairy biomass in a 100,000 Btu/hr furnace. MS Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  71. USDA, Cornell University, the University of Vermont. Nitrogen management on dairy farms: types of N in manure. Available online at: http://www.dairyn.cornell.edu/pages/20cropsoil/250credits/251manTypes.shtml. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Robinson AL, Rhodes JS, Keith DW. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal co-firing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2003; 37(22):5081−5089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Lissianski VV, Zamansky VM, Maly PM. Effect of metal-containing additives on NOx reduction in combustion and reburning. Combust Flame 2001;125(3):1118–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yang YB, Naja TA, Gibbs BM, Hampartsoumian E. Optimisation of operating parameters for NO reduction by coal reburning in a 0.2MWt furnace. J Inst Energy 1997;70:9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Annamalai K, Thien B. Feedlot manure as reburn fuel for NOx reduction in coal fired plants. National Combustion Conference. Oakland, California, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Oh H, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM. Investigations of ash fouling with cattle wastes as reburn fuel in a small boiler burner under transient conditions. Submitted to the J. Air Waste Manage Assoc on March 14, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Arumugam S. Nitrogen oxides emission control through reburning with biomass in coalfired power plants. MS Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Colmegna G, Annamalai K, Udayasarathy AV. Modeling of Hg reduction during reburn process with the use of cattle biomass as a reburn fuel. Third International Green Energy Conference (IGEC-III), Västerås, Sweden, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  79. USEPA. Documentation for EPA base case 2006 (V.3.0) using the integrated planning model. Clean Air Markets Division of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Contract No. 430-R-05-011. Available online at: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/epa-ipm/. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  80. USEPA. Analyzing electric power generation under the CAAA, Appendix No. 5. A technical report by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zamansky VM, Sheldon MS, Lissianski VV, Maly PM, Moyeda DK, Marquez A, et al. Advanced biomass reburning for high efficiency NOx control and biomass reburning – modeling/engineering studies. USDA Phase II SBIR, Contract #97-33610-4470 and DOE-NETL, Contract #DE-FC26-97FT-97270. Available online at: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/786516-Dddr9I/native/786516.pdf. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Carlin N, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Mukhtar S. Thermo-chemical conversion analysis on dairy manure-based biomass through direct combustion. Int J Green Energy 2007;4:1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Carlin N, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Mukhtar S. Utilization of latent heat derived from vaporized wastewater in high moisture dairy manure combustion schemes. International Symposium on Air Quality and Waste Management for Agriculture. Broomfield, Colorado, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kolber SN. Treatment of waste produced by farm animals raised under confined conditions. US Patent #6,190,566, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Mooney R, Mooney D, Latulippe D. Method and apparatus for the gasification and combustion of animal waste, human waste, and/or biomass using a moving grate over a stationary perforated plate in a configured chamber. US Patent #6,948,436 B2, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rudiger H, Kicherer A, Greul U, Spliethoff H, Hein KRG. Investigations in combined combustion of biomass and coal in power plant technology. Energy Fuels 1996;10:789–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Rudiger H, Greul U, Spliethoff H, Hein KRG. Distribution of fuel nitrogen in pyrolysis products used for reburning. Fuel 1997;76(3):201–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Sweeten JM, Heflin K. Preliminary interpretation of data from proximate, ultimate and ash analysis, results of June 7, 2006, samples taken from feedlot and dairy biomass biofuel feedstocks at TAES/USDA-ARS, Bushland, TX. Amarillo/Bushland/Etter, Texas, Texas A&M Agricultural Research & Extension Center, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Maly PM, Zamansky VM, Ho L, Payne R. Alternative fuel reburning. Fuel 1999; 78:327−334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Sweterlitsch JJ, Brown RC (2002) Fuel lean biomass reburning in coal-fired boilers. Final technical report to the DOE, Award number DE-FG26-00NT40811. Submitted by the Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies, Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Nicholas T. Carlin, Kalyan Annamalai, Hyukjin Oh, Gerardo Gordillo Ariza, Ben Lawrence & Udayasarathy Arcot V.

  2. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M University System, Amarillo, TX, USA

    John M. Sweeten & Kevin Heflin

  3. Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M University System, Temple, TX, USA

    Wyatte L. Harman

Authors
  1. Nicholas T. Carlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kalyan Annamalai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyukjin Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerardo Gordillo Ariza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ben Lawrence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Udayasarathy Arcot V.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John M. Sweeten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kevin Heflin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wyatte L. Harman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Xianguo Li

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carlin, N. et al. (2011). Co-combustion and Gasification of Coal and Cattle Biomass: a Review of Research and Experimentation. In: Li, X. (eds) Green Energy. Progress in Green Energy, vol 1. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-647-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-647-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-646-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-647-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation