Skip to main content

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has witnessed a huge amount of growth in its application to cardiac disease in the last ten years due, in part, to developments in signal acquisition and processing. MRI provides clinicians with important information regarding anatomy, function, perfusion, and viability of the myocardium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, et al. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(1):29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuang ML, Hibberd MG, Salton CJ, et al. Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(2):477–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Wu E, Lee DC, Holly TA, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO. Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in the evaluation of myocardial infarction and myocardial viability in patients with ischemic heart disease. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2006;31(2):128–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation. 1999;100(19):1992–2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(6):1985–1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology. 2001;218(1):215–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(20):1445–1453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Amado LC, Gerber BL, Gupta SN, et al. Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(12):2383–2389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu LY, Natanzon A, Kellman P, Hirsch GA, Aletras AH, Arai AE. Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part I: Animal validation of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23(3):298–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The DICOM Standard available at http://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/2009/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel C. Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: MRI Image Formation

Appendix: MRI Image Formation

The basis of the signal in MRI is the excitation of nuclear spins which emit a RF signal. When returning to their unperturbed state, water molecules emit an electromagnetic signal that is slightly different, depending on the local environment. This process is known as relaxation. The process by which the perturbed spins return to their unperturbed state is complex, but is well described by a differential equation known as the Bloch equation,

$$ \frac{d\overrightarrow{M}}{dt}=\overrightarrow{M}\times \gamma \overrightarrow{B}{­}\frac{{M}_{x}\widehat{i}+{M}_{y}\widehat{j}}{{T}_{2}}{­}\frac{({M}_{z}{­}{M}_{0})\widehat{k}}{{T}_{1}}. $$

In the Bloch equation, M is the magnetization vector of a small macroscopic volume of tissue (or “Voxel”). Magnetization is a vector quantity, and changes in this vector are accompanied by the emission of electromagnetic waves that are detected in the MRI receiver coils. The Bloch equation consists of three terms. The first term:

$$ \overrightarrow{M}\times \gamma \overrightarrow{B} $$

is a mathematical representation of the RF excitation pulse which tips the magnetization from its unperturbed state. The second and third terms describe the transverse and longitudinal relaxation of the magnetization. The rate of the transverse relaxation or “dephasing” depends on the T2 rate constant. In other words, the second term describes the rate at which spins lose phase coherence. T2 will vary from tissue to tissue and this term describes T2 image contrast. The last term describes the rate at which the magnetization realigns itself with the main magnetic field. It is referred to as the longitudinal relaxation rate (T1).

The MRI signal that is acquired, S(t), by the scanner is the frequency space representation of the image, I(x,y). Spatial localization of the MRI signal is achieved by shifting the frequency and phase of the local magnetic field. These slight differences in frequency are sufficient to localize the signal to better than 1 mm. The amount of phase and frequency shift is controlled by the MRI pulse sequence through the application of local field gradients, Gx and Gy. The MRI signal is recorded as segments of an electromagnetic signal S(t, ty). This signal is related to the true MRI image by:

$$ S(t;{t}_{y})=\underset{x}{\int }\underset{y}{\int }I(x,y){e}^{-i\gamma {G}_{y}y{t}_{y}}{e}^{-i\gamma {G}_{x}xt}dydx. $$

The expression shown above is well known in the engineering literature as the Fourier Transformation of the Image. Fast Fourier transform algorithms for the calculation of the image, I(x, y), have existed since the early 1960s. After a signal is acquired, a Fast Fourier Transform must be performed by the scanners image reconstruction computer prior to review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, D.C., Carroll, T.J. (2010). Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: Goldberger, J., Ng, J. (eds) Practical Signal and Image Processing in Clinical Cardiology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-515-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-515-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-514-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-515-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics