Skip to main content

Patient-Reported Outcome Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Research Informatics

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 2400 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a brief introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), with an emphasis on measure characteristics and the implications for informatics of the use of PROs in clinical research. Because of increased appreciation on behalf of healthcare funders and regulatory agencies for actual patient experience, PROs have become recognized as legitimate and attractive endpoints for clinical studies and for comparative effectiveness research. “Patient-reported outcomes” is an internationally recognized umbrella term that includes both single dimension and multidimension measures of symptoms, with the defining characteristic that all information is provided directly by the patient. PROs can be administered in a variety of formats and settings, ranging from face-to-face interaction in clinics to web interfaces to mobile devices (e.g., smart phones). PRO instruments measure one or more aspects of patients’ health status and are especially important when more objective measures of disease outcome are not available. PROs can be used to measure a broad array of health status indicators within the context of widely varying study designs exploring a multitude of diseases. As a result, they need to be well characterized so that they can be identified and used appropriately. The standardization, indexing, access, and implementation of PROs are issues that are particularly relevant to clinical research informatics. In this chapter, we discuss design characteristics of PROs, measurement issues relating to the use of PROs, modes of administration, item and scale development, scale repositories, and item banking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. FDA. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures; use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Silver Spring: U. S. D. o. H. a. H. Services; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McKenna P, Doward L. Integrating patient reported outcomes. Value Health. 2004;7:S9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garratt A. Patient reported outcome measures in trials. BMJ. 2009;338:a2597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiklund I. Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004;18:351–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shields A, Gwaltney C, Tiplady B, et al. Grasping the FDA’s PRO guidance: what the agency requires to support the selection of patient reported outcome instruments. Appl Clin Trials. 2006;15:69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Valderas J, Alonso J. Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1125–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Skinner J, Teresi J, et al. Measurement in older ethnically diverse populations: overview of the volume. J Ment Health Aging. 2001;7:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anastasi A. Psychological testing. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan R, Teal C, et al. Measurement in VA health services research: veterans as a special population. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1573–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeVellis R. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vogt W. Dictionary of statistics and methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aday L, Cornelius L. Designing and conducting health surveys: a comprehensive guide. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health. 2005;27:281–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dillman D. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coons S, Gwaltney C, et al. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health. 2009;12:419–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cole E, Pisano ED, Clary GJ, Zeng D, Koomen M, Kuzmiak CM, Seo BK, Lee Y, Pavic D. A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75:722–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Collins R, Kashdan T, et al. The feasibility of using cellular phones to collect ecological momentary assessment data: application to alcohol consumption. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;11:73–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Freedman M, Lester K, et al. Cell phones for ecological momentary assessment with cocaine-addicted homeless patients in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30:105–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reid S, Kauer S, et al. A mobile phone program to track young people’s experiences of mood, stress and coping. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009;44(6):501–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harniss M, Amtmann D, et al. Considerations for developing interfaces for collecting patient-reported outcomes that allow the inclusion of individuals with disabilities. Med Care. 2007;45:S48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert O. Morgan Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morgan, R.O., Sail, K.R. (2012). Patient-Reported Outcome Data. In: Richesson, R., Andrews, J. (eds) Clinical Research Informatics. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-448-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-448-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-447-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-448-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics