Abstract
The introduction to the proceedings of the Royal Academy of Engineering 2006 seminar on The Economics and Morality of Safety (RAEng 2006) concluded with a list of issues that were ‘worthy of further exploration’. I have reduced them to the following questions:
-
Why do moral arguments about ‘rights’ persist unresolved?
-
Why can risk managers not agree on a common value for preventing a fatality?
-
Why do governments and the media react differently to different causes of death?
-
Why do some institutions profess to be pursuing zero risk, knowing that achieving it is impossible?
-
Why do some institutions pretend that their risk management problems can be reduced to a calculation in which all significant variables can be represented by a common metric?
-
Why are societal attitudes and risk communication still seen as problematic after many years of investigation?
-
Why are certain accident investigations, criminal or civil, seen as ‘over zealous’ by some and justifiable by others?
These questions are addressed with the help of a set of risk framing devices. For some my conclusion will be discouraging: all of these issues are likely to remain unresolved. Risk is a word that refers to the future. It has no objective existence. The future exists only in the imagination, and a societal consensus about what the future holds does not exist.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams J (2006) The Failure of Seat Belt Legislation. In: Verweij M, Thompson M (eds) Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. See also http://johnadams. co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2006/failure\%20of \%20seatbelt\%20legislation.pdf and http://john-adams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/seat-belts-for-significance-2.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2008
Adams J, Thompson M (2002) Taking account of societal concerns about risk. Health and Safety Executive Research Report 035. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr035.pdf. Accessed 11 September 2008
Appleton J, Ball J, Weldon F et al (2006) Children’s cost in safety bill. Letter to the Times, 16 October. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article601499.ece. Accessed 11 September 2008
Lowenstein R (2002) When Genius Failed: the rise and fall of Long Term Capital Management. Fourth Estate, London
Medawar PB (1967) The Art of the Soluble. Methuen, London
RAEng (2006) The Economics and Morality of Safety. The Royal Academy of Engineering, London. http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/Safety_Seminar.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2008
Taleb NN (2005) Fooled by Randomness. Random House, New York
Wilde GJS (2001) Target Risk 2: A New Psychology of Safety and Health. PDE Publications, Toronto
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Adams, J. (2009). Risk Management: the Economics and Mor ality of Safety Revisited. In: Dale, C., Anderson, T. (eds) Safety-Critical Systems: Problems, Process and Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-349-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-349-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-348-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-349-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)