Skip to main content

The Role of Scientific Journals in Disseminating New Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery

Abstract

Scientific journals have been at the heart of medical technological advancements and remain an integral role in distributing information. The path of discovery in many of the commonly used technologies has really been quite interesting. Advancements in laparoscopy have been astonishing since the first clinical laparoscopic nephrectomy in 1991 by Clayman et al. Observing the application of laparoscopy to new and innovative ways is fascinating with tangents such as robotics, laparoscopic-augmented reality images, and natural orifice surgery. This chapter walks you through the scientific journals’ progressive description of these old and new technologies from case reporting to randomized controlled trials to illustrate the important role they play in disseminating information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guner H, Yildiz A, Erdem A, Erdem M, Tiftik Z, Yildirim M. Surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence by a suburethral sling procedure using a Mersilene mesh graft. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;37:52–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wohlrab KJ, Erekson EA, Myers DL. Postoperative erosions of the Mersilene suburethral sling mesh for antiincontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:417–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon NS. Day-case holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for gland volumes of ml: early experience. BJU Int. 2003;92:330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ. Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 1998;33:69–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Naspro R, Bachmann A, Gilling P, et al. A review of the recent evidence (2006–2008) for 532-nm photoselective laser vaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1345–1357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Cleynenbreugel B, Srirangam SJ, Van Poppel H. High-performance system GreenLight laser: indications and outcomes. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19:33–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman RM, Monga M, Elliot SP, Macdonald R, Wilt TJ. Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007:CD004135.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hock LM, Lynch J, Balaji KC. Increasing incidence of all stages of kidney cancer in the last 2 decades in the United States: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results program data. J Urol. 2002;167:57–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1969;101:297–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinberg JJ, Smith AD. Percutaneous resection of the kidney: preliminary report. J Endourol. 1988;2:355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ikari O, Netto NJ, Palma PC, D‘Ancona CA. Percutaneous nephrectomy in nonfunctioning kidneys: a preliminary report. J Urol. 1990;144:966–968.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991;146:278–282.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds W Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2001;5:89–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pisani E, Austoni E, Trinchieri A, et al. Urological laparoscopy: our preliminary results. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1993;65:687–694.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Andersen MH, Mathisen L, Veenstra M, et al. Quality of life after randomization to laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: long-term follow-up. Transplantation. 2007;84:64–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burgess NA, Koo BC, Calvert RC, Hindmarsh A, Donaldson PJ, Rhodes M. Randomized trial of laparoscopic v open nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2007;21:610–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R, Wadhwa P, Seth A, Gupta NP. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol. 2007;177:862–866.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dunn MD, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2000;14:849–855.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eskicorapci SY, Teber D, Schulze M, Ates M, Stock C, Rassweiler JJ. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the new gold standard surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:825–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate. 1983;4:473–485.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50:854–857.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Rozet F, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions. Presse Med. 1998;27:1570–1574.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Rozet F, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol. 1999;36:14–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate. 1999;39:71–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fabrizio MD, Tuerk I, Schellhammer PF. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach. J Urol. 2003;169:2063–2065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eden CG, Neill MG, Louie-Johnsun MW. The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple ‘learning curves’. BJU Int. 2009;103:1224–1230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Menon M, Hemal AK. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy: experience in more than 1000 cases. J Endourol. 2004;18:611–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Iseki H, Masutani Y, Iwahara M, et al. Volumegraph (overlaid three-dimensional image-guided navigation). Clinical application of augmented reality in neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;68:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Marescaux J, Rubino F, Arenas M, Mutter D, Soler L. Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. JAMA. 2004;292:2214–2215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sato Y, Nakamoto M, Tamaki Y, et al. Image guidance of breast cancer surgery using 3-D ultrasound images and augmented reality visualization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:681–693.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ukimura O, Gill IS. Imaging-assisted endoscopic surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience. J Endourol. 2008;22: 803–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ukimura O, Mitterberger M, Okihara K, et al. Real-time virtual ultrasonographic radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2008;101:707–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ukimura O, Gill IS. Image-fusion, augmented reality, and predictive surgical navigation. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36:115–123, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Breda G, Silvestre P, Giunta A, Xausa D, Tamai A, Gherardi L. Laparoscopic nephrectomy with vaginal delivery of the intact kidney. Eur Urol. 1993;24:116–117.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gill IS, Cherullo EE, Meraney AM, Borsuk F, Murphy DP, Falcone T. Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2002;167:238–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:114–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, et al. Pilot study of the porcine uterine horn as an in vivo appendicitis model for development of endoscopic transgastric appendectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:808–812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, Odze RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC. Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:428–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:329–333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. White WM, Haber GP, Doerr MJ, Gettman M. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36:147–155, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rattner D. Introduction to NOTES white paper. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gettman MT, Blute ML. Transvesical peritoneoscopy: initial clinical evaluation of the bladder as a portal for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:843–845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, et al. Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:16–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg. 2007;142:823–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tsin DA, Colombero LT, Lambeck J, Manolas P. Minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery. JSLS. 2007;11:24–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Clayman RV, Box GN, Abraham JB, et al. Rapid communication: transvaginal single-port NOTES nephrectomy: initial laboratory experience. J Endourol. 2007;21:640–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Crouzet S, Haber GP, Kamoi K, et al. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) renal cryoablation in a porcine model. BJU Int. 2008;102:1715–1718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Box GN, Lee HJ, Santos RJ, et al. Rapid communication: robot-assisted NOTES nephrectomy: initial report. J Endourol. 2008;22:503–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kaouk JH, White WM, Goel RK, et al. NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy: first human experience. Urology. 2009;74:5–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Fitzpatrick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGuire, B.B., Fitzpatrick, J.M. (2011). The Role of Scientific Journals in Disseminating New Technology. In: Hemal, A., Menon, M. (eds) Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-114-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-114-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-113-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-114-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics