Abstract
The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to increase, and survival remains poor in comparison to other stage-matched malignancies. Early detection and aggressive intervention are demonstrated to provide optimal results for patients who have early esophageal cancer or Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia [1]. Mortality statistics for esophageal resection in institutions with low volume have led to comparisons showing significantly improved mortality in institutions with high volume [2]. Morbidity, however, remains high at most centers and has provided the impetus for adopting a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. Development of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic techniques for fundoplication, giant paraesophageal hernia repair, and esophageal myotomy and pulmonary lobectomy have given surgeons the tools necessary for MIS esophageal resection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Eloubeidi MA, Mason AC, Desmond RA, et al. Temporal trends (1973–1997) in survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States: a glimmer of hope? Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1627–33.
Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV. Hospital and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128–37.
Rampado S, Bocus P, Battaglia G, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: accuracy in staging superficial carcinomas of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85(1):251–6.
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999;230:392–403.
Martin LW, Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, et al. Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality. Ann Surg 2005;242(3):392–9 [discussion: 399–402].
Rentz J, Bull DA, Harpole D, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1114–20.
Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:306–13.
Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:217–22.
van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA, et al. First experience with robot-assisted thorocoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. SurgEndosc 2006;20(9):1435–9.
Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238(4):486–94 [discussion: 494–5].
Gemmill EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro–esophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94(12):1461–7.
Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, et al. Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality, and survival. Surg Endosc 2006;20(11):1681–6.
Nakajima M, Kato H, Miyazaki T, et al. Comprehensive investigations of quality of life after esophagectomy with special reference to the route of reconstruction. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54(73):104–10.
Gerson LB, Ullah N, Hastie T, et al. Does cancer risk affect health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett’s esophagus? Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65(1):10–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maloney, J.D., Weigel, T.L. (2009). Esophagectomy. In: Chen, H. (eds) Illustrative Handbook of General Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-089-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-089-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-088-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-089-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)