Skip to main content

A Case Study to Support Conceptual Design Decision Making Using Context Knowledge

  • Conference paper
  • 2973 Accesses

Abstract

Conceptual design is the most important phase of the product life cylce as the decisions taken at conceptual design stage affect the downstreams phases (manufacture, assembly, use, maintenance, disposal) in terms of cost, quality and function performed by the product. This research takes a hoilistic view by incorporating the knowledge related to the whole context (from the viewpoint of product, user, product’s life cycle and environment in which the product operates) of a design problem for the consideration of the designer at the conceptual design stage. The design context knowledge comprising knowledge from these different viewpoints is formalised and a new model and corresponding computational framework is proposed to support conceptual design decision making using this formalised context knowledge. This paper presents a case study to show the proof of the concept by selecting one concept among different design alternatives using design context knowledge thereby proactively supporting conceputal design decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6. References

  1. Andreasen M. M. and Olesen J. The Concept of Dispositions, Journal of Engineering Design, 1990, 1(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borg, J. C. and Yan, X.T. Design Decision Consequences: Key to ‘Design For Multi-X’ Support’, In 2 nd International Symposium ‘Tools and Methods for Concurrent Engineering, 1998, Manchester, UK, pp. 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rehman F. A Framework for Conceptual Design Decision Support, 2006, CAD centre, Dept. of DMEM, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rehman F. Yan X.T. and Borg, J. C. Conceptual design decision making using design context knowledge, In 5 th International Conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering (IDMME 2004), Bath, UK, April 5–7, 2004, pp 107.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oxford The New Oxford Dictionary of English, 1998, Oxford University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charlton, C. and Wallace, K. Reminding and context in design, In Artificial Intelligence in Design 2000, 2000, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 596–588.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Y. Computer-based modelling and management for current working knowledge evolution, 1998, PhD Thesis, Strathclyde University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yan, X.T. Rehman, F. Borg, J.C. FORESEEing design solution consequences using design context information, In 5 th IFP Workshop in Knowledge-Intensive Computer-Aided Design,2002, Malta, pp.18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borg, C. J. and MacCallum K.J. A Life-Cycle Consequences Model Approach To The Design For Multi-X of Components, In 11th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED97), 1997, Tampere, Finland, pp. 647–652.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borg, C. J. Yan, X. T. Juster, N. P. Guiding component form design using decision consequence knowledge support, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1999, 13, 387–403.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Welch R. V. and Dixon J. R. Representing function, behaviour and structure during conceptual design, In ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, 1992,Scottsdale, USA, pp.11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andreasen M. M. and Olesen J. The Concept of Dispositions, Journal of Engineering Design, 1990, 1(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Borg, C. J. Yan, X. T. Juster, N. P. Guiding component form design using decision consequence knowledge support, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1999, 13, 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rehman, F. and Yan, X.T. (2003) ‘Product design elements as means to realize functions in mechanical conceptual design’, Proceedings of 14 th International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 03, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saaty, T.L. How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48, 9–26.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rehman, F., Yan, XT. (2008). A Case Study to Support Conceptual Design Decision Making Using Context Knowledge. In: Yan, XT., Jiang, C., Eynard, B. (eds) Advanced Design and Manufacture to Gain a Competitive Edge. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-241-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-241-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-240-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-241-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics