Skip to main content

Drilling and Associated Technologies

  • Chapter
  • 4340 Accesses

Abstract

Drilling operations are perhaps the most popular machining process being undertaken today, with their origins being traced back to cutting tool developments in North America in the 19th century. In 1864 toward the latter part of the American Civil War, Steven Morse (i.e. later to design the significant ‘Morse taper’ – for accurate location of the ‘sleeved drills’ into their mating machine tool spindles) founded the Morse Twist Drill and Machine Company in the ‘North’. Morse then proceeded to develop probably the most important cutting tool advance to date, namely, the ubiquitous twist drill. In Fig. 42, several of today’s twist drills are illustrated along with just a small range of ‘solid’ contemporary designs. Morse’s originally-designed twist drill has changed very little over the last 150 years – since its conception. In comparison to the somewhat cruder-designed contemporary drills of that time, Morse stated: ‘The common drill scrapes metal to be drilled, while mine cuts the metal and discharges the chips and borings without clogging’. Morse’s statement was at best, to some extent optimistic, whereas the ‘cold reality’ tells a different story, as a drill’s performance is influenced by a considerable number of factors, most of which are listed in Fig. 43.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Journal and Conference Papers

  • Agapiou, J.S. and DeVries, M.F. On the Determination of Thermal Phenomena during Drilling – Part I. Analytical Models of Twist Drill Temperature Distributions. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact., Vol. 30 (2), 203–215, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agapiou, J.S. and DeVries, M.F. On the Determination of Thermal Phenomena during Drilling – Part II. Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Twist Drill Temperature Distributions. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact., Vol. 30 (2), 217–226, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. Good points [Drilling geometries]. Cutting Tool Eng’g, Vol. 45 (6), 50–56, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astakhov, V. Gundrilling Know-how. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 34–38, Dec. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atabey, F. Lazoglu, I. and Alintas, Y. Mechanics of Boring Processes – Part I. Int. J. Mach. Tools and Manufact., 463–476, Vol. 43, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atabey, F. Lazoglu, I. and Alintas, Y. Mechanics of Boring Processes – Part II – Multi-insert Boring Heads. Int. J. Mach. Tools and Manufact., 477–484, Vol. 43, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, B.W. and Lukens, W.P. An Investigation of Twist Drills; Part 1. Bull. Univ. o Illinois Eng’g Exp. Station, No. 103, 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, O.W. and Gilbert, W.W. The Torque and Thrust of Small Drills Operating in Various Metals. Trans. of ASME, Vol. 58 (2), 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths B.J and Grieve, R.J. The Role of the Burnishing Pad in the Mechanics of Deep Drilling Processes. Int. J. Prod. Res., Vol. 23 (4), 195–205, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, K. Farewell to BUE [In drilling]. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 44–47, Feb. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, T.R. Chatter Suppression by Controlled Mechanical Impedence. PhD Thesis, Dept. of Mech. Eng’g, Univ. of Cincinnati (Ohio), USA, June 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deren, M. Check the Index. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 51–55, Sept. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiesselmann, F. and Dietz, G. Pointing Towards Drilling Rates. Modern Machine Shop, 1–7, June 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, G.W. A Comparative Study of the Lanchester Damper and the Segmented Slug Damper in Boring Bar Applications. Proc. of ASME, No. 81–DET–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frade, T. Twist Drill Shape-up. Cutting Tool Eng’g, Vol. 42 (2), 39–44, Feb. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, D.F. Some Experiemnts on the Influence of Various Factors on Drill Performance. Trans. of ASME, 191–231, Feb., 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habeck, A. Steadying the [Boring] Bar. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 46–50, Dec. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, W.A. Effect of Point Geometry and Dimensional Symmetry on Drill Performance. Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., Vol. 1, 41–58, 1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. Boring Tools get … Interesting. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 34–37, Dec. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. Cutting the Hard Stuff Right. Manuf. Eng’g., 179–187, May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inada, S. et al. On a Method to Prevent Chatter in Boring Operations. Bull. of the JSME, Vol. 17 (108), 835–840, June 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inamura, T. and Stat, T. Stability Analysis of Cutting under Varying Spindle Speed. J. of JSPE, Vol. 43 (1), 80–85, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javed, M.A, Littlefair, G. and Smith, G.T. Tool Wear Monitoring for Turning Centres. Proc. of LAMDAMAP Int. Conf., Computational Mechanics Pub., 251–259, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. Reaming Technology. Industrial Tooling Int. Conf., Southampton (UK), Molyneux Press, 132–152, Sept. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. Reaming Application for the Automotive Industry. Industrial Tooling Int. Conf., Southampton (UK), Test Valley Pub., 288–304, Sept. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahng, C.H. and Ham, I. Effect of Metallurgical Properties on Drill Life. In: Influence of Metallurgy on Hole Making Operations, ASM Pub. (Ohio), 182–204, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashara, N., Sato, H. and Fani, Y. Phase Characteristics of Self-excited Chatter in Cutting. J for Eng’g for Ind., ASME Pub., Vol. 114, 393–399, Nov. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.R. and Nachtigal, C.L. A Theoretical Basis for Active Control of Boring Bar Operations. Trans. of ASME: J. Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, Vol. 97, June 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, C. Optimizing Deep-hole Drilling. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 32–38, Feb. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. Turn your Wipers on. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 47–51, Jan. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubara, T., Yamamoto, H. and Mizumoto, H. Chatter Suppression by using Piezoelectric Active Damper. Dept. of Mech. Eng’g, Report, Tottori Univ. (Japan), 79–83, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • McColl, M. and Leadbetter, R. CAD of Multifacet Drills. Proc. of 13th NARMRC (SME), 490–495, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, R.W. and Au, Y.H.J. Chatter-proof Overhung Boring Bars Stability Criteria and Design Procedure for a New Type of Damped Boring Bar. Proc. of ASME, No. 79–WA/DE–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K.W. and New, R.W. Profile Boring Operations – Tests on Damped Bars using Known Vibratory Forces, Trans. of Int. J. Prod. Res., Vol 14 (2), 149–169, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noaker, P.M. Drilling with a Twist, Manufact. Eng’g., 47–51, Jan. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Jr., C.J. On the Drilling of Metals: 1 – Basic Mechanics of the Process. Trans. of ASME, Feb. 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Jr., C.J. Fundamentals of Drilling, Tapping and Reaming. In: Influence of Metallurgy in Hole-making Operations, ASM Pub., 1–18, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, H. Strictly Boring. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 22–30, Vol. 47 (7), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna Rao, P.K. and Shunmugam, M.S. Accuracy and Surface Finish in BTA Drilling. Int. J. Prod. Res., Vol. 25 (1), 31–44, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivin, E.I. A Chatter-resistant Cantilever Boring Bar. Int. Conf. Wayne State Univ. 403–407, Oct. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skuma, K. Taguchi, K. and Katsuki, A. Study on Deep-hole Boring by BTA System Solid Boring Tool – Behaviour of Tool and Its Effects on Profile of Machined Hole. Bull. Japan Soc. Prec. Eng’g. Vol. 14 (3), 143–148, Sept. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama, A.s. and Elsawy, A.H. The Dynamic Geometry of a Twist Drill Point. Int. Conf. AMPT’93, Dublin City Univ. Pub., Vol. 1, 41–50, Aug. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, G. The Cutting Angle of Twist Drills. The Engr., Vol. 166 (4), 138, Dec. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, N. Balanced Boring. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 62–66, April 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M.C. and Oxford Jr., C.J. On the Drilling of Metals: 2 – the Torque and Thrust in Drilling. Trans. of ASME, Vol. 79, 139–148, June 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G., Krenzer, U. and Gsänger D. Capacity of Drilling Tools with Indexable Inserts, Industrial Tooling Int. Conf., Southampton (UK), Shirley Press, 33–43, Sept. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.T. Investigating the Machining Performance of Damped and Undamped Boring Bars. Proc. of LAMDAMAP Int. Conf., Computational Mechanics Pub., 509–523, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, B.C. The Replacements [Replaceable drill points]. Cutting Tool Eng’g., 34–39, Jan. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takemura, T., Kitamura, T. and Hoshi, T. Active Suppression of Chatter by Programmed Variation of Spindle Load. J. of JSPE, Vol. 41 (5), 489–498, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, K.J. and Chao, B.T. An Analytical Evaluation of Metal Cutting Temperatures. Trans. of ASME, Vol. 73, 57, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trmal, G.J. and Wyatt, J.E. Model for Predicting the Torque and Thrust and its Application in Monitoring Drilling Operations. Industrial Tooling Int. Conf., Southampton (UK), Molyneux Press, 201–210, Sept. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valikhani, M. and Chandrashekhar, S. An Experimental Investigation into the Comparison of the Performance Characteristic of TiN and ZrN Coatings on Split Point Drills using the Static and Stochastic Models of the Force System as a Signature. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., Vol. 2 (1), 75–106, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A.R. Drilling Model for Cutting Lip and Chisel Edge and Comparison of Experimental and Predicted Results – 4; Drilling Tests to Determine the Chisel Edge Contribution to Torque and Thrust. Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., Vol. 25 (4), 393–404, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P.M. Dynamics of the Twist Drilling Process. Int. J. Prod. Res. Vol. 31 (4), 823–828, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P.M. The Three-dimensional Problem of Twist Drilling. Int. J. Prod. Res. Vol. 31 (5), 1247–1254, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.A and Gibson, A.V. A Survey of Fundamental Aspects of the Drilling Process. Tech. Paper 19, Proc. of CSIRO (Melbourne), 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilshire, B. Getting Peak Performance from Indexable Drills. Cutting Tool Eng’g, 30–40, Feb. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, L. Cutting Forces in Drilling Operations: Part One. Modern Twist Drilling Tech. Vol. 2 (3) 8–11, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, L. Cutting Forces in Drilling Operations: Part Two. Modern Twist Drilling Tech. Vol. 2 (3) 12–15, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Books, Booklets and Guides

  • A Guide to Surface Texture Parameters. Taylor Hobson Precision Booklet No. 800–305 4K CP1299 (English).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, G. and Knight, W.A. Fundamentals of Metal Machining and Machine Tools. Marcel Dekker (NY), 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring with Tuned Bars, Sandvik Booklet No. HV-5300:008 ENG, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, L. and Hancox, D. Craft Engineering Data Book. Stanley Thornes Pub., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Precision Cutting Tools. Guhring Pub. 8th Ed., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Influence of Metallurgy on Hole Making Operations. ASM Pub: Materials/Metalworking Technology Series, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek, J. Principles of Machining by Cutting Abrasion and Erosion. Peter Pregrinus Pub. (Warsaw), 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalpakjian, S. Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials. Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, R. The Measurement of Surface Texture using Stylus InstrumentsMeasurement Good Practice Guide: No. 37. NPL Pub. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modern Metal Cutting – Part 8: Drilling Theory. AB Sandvik Coromant, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modern Metal Cutting – Part 9: Drilling Tools. AB Sandvik Coromant, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modern Metal Cutting – A Practical Handbook. AB Sandvik Coromant Pub., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M.C. Metal Cutting Principles. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.T. Advanced Machining – The Handbook of Cutting Technology. IFS/Springer Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.T. Industrial Metrology – Surfaces and Roundness. Springer Verlag, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainless Steel Turning, AB Sandvik Coromant Pub., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlusty, G. Manufacturing Processes and Equipment. Prentice Hall, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Drilling and Associated Technologies. In: Cutting Tool Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-205-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-205-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-204-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-205-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics