Skip to main content

Automatically Acquiring Structured Case Representations: The SMART Way

  • Conference paper
Book cover Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XV (SGAI 2007)

Abstract

Acquiring case representations from textual sources remains an interesting challenge for CBR research. Approaches based on methods in information retrieval require large amounts of data and typically result in knowledge-poor representations. The costs become prohibitive if an expert is engaged to manually craft cases or hand tag documents for learning. Thus there is a need for tools that automatically create knowledge-rich case representations from textual sources without the need to access large volumes of tagged data. Hierarchically structured case representations allow for comparison at different levels of specificity thus resulting in more effective retrieval than can be achieved with a fiat structure. In this paper, we present a novel method for automatically creating, hierarchically structured, knowledge-rich cases from textual reports in the Smart-House domain. Our system, SMART, uses a set of anchors to highlight key phrases in the reports. The key phrases are then used to learn a hierarchically structured case representation onto which reports are mapped to create the corresponding structured cases. SMART does not require large sets of tagged data for learning, and the concepts in the case representation are interpretable, allowing for expert refinement of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Aamodt and E. Plaza. Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Asiimwe, S. Craw, B. Taylor, and N. Wiratunga. Case authoring: from textual reports to knowledge-rich cases. In Proc of the 7th Int. Conf. on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 179–193. Springer, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Brüninghaus and K. D. Ashley. The role of information extraction for textual CBR. In Proc of the 4th Int. Conf. on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 74–89. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. W. Cohen and Y. Singer. Context-sensitive learning methods for text categorization. In SIGIR, pages 307–315, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, and R. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6):391407, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. Nahm and R. Mooney. Text mining with information extraction, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Patterson, N. Rooney, V. Dobrynin, and M. Galushka. Sophia: A novel approach for textual case-based reasoning. In Proc of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 15–20, 2005. Professional Book Center.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. C. N. Pereira, N. Tishby, and L. Lee. Distributional clustering of english words. In Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 183–190, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. Priss. Formal concept analysis in information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Riloff. Automatically generating extraction patterns from untagged text. In Proc of the Thirteenth National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1044–1049, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Salton and M. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Thompson. Automatic categorization of case law. In Proc of the 8th Int. Conf. on Artificial intelligence and law, pages 70–77, 2001. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. O. Weber, K. D. Ashley, and S. Brüninghaus. Textual Case-Based Reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review, 20(3):255–260, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Wiratunga, S. Craw, B. Taylor, and G. Davis. Case-based reasoning for matching Smart-House technology to people’s needs. Knowledge Based Systems, 17(2-4):139–146, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Wiratunga, R. Lothian, and S. Massie. Unsupervised feature selection for text data. In Proc of the 8th European Conf. on Case-based Reasoning, pages 340–354. Springer, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asiimwe, S., Craw, S., Wiratunga, N., Taylor, B. (2008). Automatically Acquiring Structured Case Representations: The SMART Way. In: Ellis, R., Allen, T., Petridis, M. (eds) Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XV. SGAI 2007. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-086-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-086-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-085-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-086-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics