Skip to main content

Semantic Web

  • Chapter
Book cover Web Accessibility

Part of the book series: Human-Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

The Semantic Web aims to explicate the meaning of Web content by adding semantic annotations that describe the content and function of resources. Providing shareable annotations requires the use of ontologies that describe a common model of a domain. The Web Ontology Language OWL has been defined in order to support representation of ontologies, and their manipulation through the use of reasoning. We provide a brief overview of OWL and the underlying theory, describe applications of ontologies, and give pointers to areas of overlap between Semantic Web and Accessibility research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/10/

  2. 2.

    http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ bmotik/HermiT/

References

  • Shadi Abou-Zahra. Semanticweb enabled web accessibility evaluation tools. In W4A ’05: Proc. of the 2005 Int. Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), pages 99–101, New York, USA, 2005. ACM Press. ISBN 1-59593-219-4. doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1061811.1061830.

  • Chieko Asakawa and Hironobu Takagi. Annotation-based transcoding for nonvisual web access. In Proc. of the Fourth Int. ACM Conf. on Assistive Technologies, pages 172–179. ACM Press, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franz Baader, Diego Calvanese, Deborah McGuinness, Daniele Nardi, and Peter F. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sean Bechhofer, Ian Horrocks, and Daniele Turi. The OWL instance store: System description. In Proc. of the 20th Int. Conf. on Automated Deduction (CADE-20), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 177–181. Springer, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sean Bechhofer, Simon Harper, and Darren Lunn. SADIe: Semantic Annotation for Accessibility. In I. Cruz, S. Decker, D. Allemang, C. Preist, D. Schwabe, P. Mika, M. Uschold, and L. Aroyo, editors, Proc. of ISWC2006, the Fifth Int. Semantic Web Conf., volume 4273 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 101–115. Springer, November 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tim Berners-Lee. Semantic web road map, September 1998. Available at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html

  • Ronald J. Brachman and James G. Schmolze. An overview of the Kl-One knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9(2):171–216, April 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie Carr, Sean Bechhofer, Carole Goble, and Wendy Hall. Conceptual Linking: Ontology-based Open Hypermedia. In WWW10, Tenth World Wide Web Conference, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Ian Horrocks, Yevgeny Kazakov, and Ulrike Sattler. Just the right amount: Extracting modules from ontologies. In Proc. of the Sixteenth Inter. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW 2007), 2007a. URL download/2007/CHKS07a.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Yevgeny Kazakov, Ian Horrocks, and Ulrike Sattler. A logical framework for modular integration of ontologies. In Proc. of the 20th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), 2007b. URL download/2007/CKHS07a.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian Derriere, Andre Richard, and Andrea Preite-Martinez. An ontology of astronomical object types for the virtual observatory. Proc. of Special Session 3 of the 26th meeting of the IAU: Virtual Observatory in Action: New Science, New Technology, and Next Generation Facilities, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Dzbor, John Domingue, and Enrico Motta. Magpie – Towards a Semantic Web Browser. In Dieter Fensel, Katia Sycara, and John Mylopoulos, editors, 2nd Int. Semantic Web Conf., ISWC, volume 2870 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieter Fensel, Frank van Harmelen, Ian Horrocks, Deborah McGuinness, and Peter F. Patel-Schneider. OIL: An ontology infrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):38–45, 2001. URL download/2001/IEEE-IS01.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Christine Golbreich, Songmao Zhang, and Olivier Bodenreider. The foundational model of anatomy in OWL: Experience and perspectives. Journal of Web Semantics, 4(3), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Goodwin. Experiences of using OWL at the ordnance survey. In Proc. of the First OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop, volume 188 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR. 2005 (http://ceur-ws.org/)

  • Volker Haarslev and Ralf Möller. RACER system description. In Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001), volume 2083 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 701–705. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried Handschuh and Steffen Staab, editors. Annotation for the Semantic Web, volume 96 of Frontiers in Artifical Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon Harper and Sean Bechhofer. Semantic Triage for Accessibility. IBM Systems Journal, 44(3):637–648, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank W. Hartel, Sherri de Coronado, Robert Dionne, Gilberto Fragoso, and Jennifer Golbeck. Modeling a description logic vocabulary for cancer research. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38(2):114–129, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ian Horrocks and Ulrike Sattler. Decidability of \(\mathcal{SHIQ}\) with complex role inclusion axioms. Artificial Intelligence, 160(1–2):79–104, December 2004.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ian Horrocks and Ulrike Sattler. A tableaux decision procedure for \(\mathcal{SHOIQ}\). In Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), pages 448–453, 2005. URL download/2005/HoSa05a.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Frank van Harmelen. Reviewing the design of DAML+OIL: An ontology language for the semantic web. In Proc. of the 18th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2002), pages 792–797. AAAI Press, 2002. ISBN 0-26251-129-0. URL download/2002/AAAI02IHorrocks.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Frank van Harmelen. From \(\mathcal{SHIQ}\) and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1):7–26, 2003. ISSN 1570-8268. URL download/2003/HoPH03a.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Horrocks, Oliver Kutz, and Ulrike Sattler. The even more irresistible \(\mathcal{SROIQ}\). In Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pages 57–67. AAAI Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich Hustadt, Boris Motik, and Ulrike Sattler. Reducing SHIQ-description logic to disjunctive datalog programs. In Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), pages 152–162, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aditya Kalyanpur, Bijan Parsia, Evren Sirin, Bernardo Cuenca-Grau, and James Hendler. SWOOP: a web ontology editing browser. Journal of Web Semantics, 4(2), 2005a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aditya Kalyanpur, Bijan Parsia, Evren Sirin, and James Hendler. Debugging unsatisfiable classes in owl ontologies. Journal of Web Semantics, 3(4):243–366, 2005b. URL http://www.mindswap.org/papers/debugging-jws.pdf

  • Aaron Kershenbaum, Achille Fokoue, Chintan Patel, Christopher Welty, dith Schonberg, James Cimino, Li Ma, Kavitha Srinivas, Robert Schloss, and J William Murdock. A view of OWL from the field: Use cases and experiences. In Proc. of the Second OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop, volume 216 of 2006 CEUR. http://ceur-ws.org/)

  • Holger Knublauch, Ray Fergerson, Natalya Noy, and Mark Musen. The Protégé OWL Plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In Sheila A. McIlraith, Dimitris Plexousakis, and Frank van Harmelen, editors, Proc. of the 2004 Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC 2004), number 3298 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 229–243. Springer, 2004. ISBN 3-540-23798-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christos Kouroupetroglou, Michail Salampasis, and Athanasios Manitsaris. A semantic-web based framework for developing applications to improve accessibility in the www. In W4A: Proc. of the 2006 Int. Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), pages 98–108, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. ISBN 1-59593-281-X. doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1133219.1133238

  • Lee Lacy, Gabriel Aviles, Karen Fraser, William Gerber, Alice Mulvehill, and Robert Gaskill. Experiences using OWL in military applications. In Proc. of the First OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop, volume 188 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR. 2005. (http://ceur-ws.org/)

  • Sheila McIlraith, Tran Cao Son, and Honglei Zeng. Semantic web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16:46–53, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Patrick Hayes, and Ian Horrocks. OWL Web Ontology Language semantics and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/

  • Alan Rector and Jeremy Rogers. Ontological and practical issues in using a description logic to represent medical concept systems: Experience from GALEN. In Reasoning Web, Second International Summer School, Tutorial Lectures, volume 4126 of LNCS, pages 197–231. SV, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan Ruttenberg, Jonathan Rees, and Joanne Luciano. Experience using OWL DL for the exchange of biological pathway information. In Proc. of the First OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop, volume 188 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR. 2005 (http://ceur-ws.org/)

  • Lisa Seeman. The semantic web, web accessibility, and device independence. In W4A ’04: Proc. of the 2004 Int. Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), pages 67–73, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. ISBN 1-58113-903-9. doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/990657.990669.

  • Amandeep Sidhu, Tharam Dillon, Elisabeth Chang, and Baldev Singh Sidhu. Protein ontology development using OWL. In Proc. of the First OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop, volume 188 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR. 2005 (http://ceur-ws.org/)

  • Evren Sirin, Bijan Parsia, Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Aditya Kalyanpur, and Yarden Katz. Pellet: A practical owl-dl reasoner, To appear, 2005. URL http://www.mindswap.org/papers/PelletJWS.pdf.

  • Dagobert Soergel, Boris Lauser, Anita Liang, Frehiwot Fisseha, Johannes Keizer, and Stephen Katz. Reengineering thesauri for new applications: The AGROVOC example. Journal of Digital Information, 4(4), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Spackman. Managing clinical terminology hierarchies using algorithmic calculation of subsumption: Experience with SNOMED-RT. Journal of the American Med. Informatics Ass., 2000. Fall Symposium Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • SWEET. Semantic web for earth and environmental terminology (SWEET). Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 2006. http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/

  • Hironobu Takagi and Chieko Asakawa. Transcoding proxy for nonvisual web access. In Proc. of the Fourth Int. ACM Conf. on Assistive Technologies, pages 164–171. ACM Press, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dmitry Tsarkov and Ian Horrocks. FaCT++ description logic reasoner: System description. In Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2006), volume 4130 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 292–297. Springer, 2006. URL download/2006/TsHo06a.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael Volz, Siegfried Handschuh, Steffen Staab, Ljiljana Stojanovic, and Nenad Stojanovic. Unveiling the hidden bride: Deep Annotation for Mapping and Migrating Legacy Data to the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • William A. Woods. What’s in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In Ronald J. Brachman and Hector J. Levesque, editors, Readings in Knowledge Representation, pages 217–241. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1985. ISBN 093461301X. Previously published in D. G. Bobrow and A. M. Collins, editors, Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, pages 35–82. New York Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeliz Yesilada, Simon Harper, Carole Goble, and Robert Stevens. Dante annotation and transformation of web pages for visually impaired users. In The Thirteenth Int. World Wide Web Conf., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeliz Yesilada, Sean Bechhofer, and Bernard Horan. Personalised Dynamic Links on the Web. In SMAP2006: 1st Int. Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Horrocks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horrocks, I., Bechhofer, S. (2008). Semantic Web. In: Harper, S., Yesilada, Y. (eds) Web Accessibility. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-050-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-050-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-049-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-050-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics