Skip to main content

A Noun Phrase Analysis Tool for Mining Online Community Conversations

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Online communities are creating a growing legacy of texts in online bulletin board postings, chat, blogs, etc. These texts record conversation, knowledge exchange, and variation in focus as groups grow, mature, and decline; they represent a rich history of group interaction and an opportunity to explore the purpose and development of online communities. However, the quantity of data created by these communities is vast, and to address their processes in a timely manner requires automated processes. This raises questions about how to conduct automated analyses, and what can we gain from them: Can we gain an idea of community interests, priorities, and operation from automated examinations of texts of postings and patterns of posting behavior? Can we mine stored texts to discover patterns of language and interaction that characterize a community?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrett, K. LaPointe, D. & Greysen, K. (Jan. 2004). Speak2Me: Using synchronous audio for ESL teaching in Taiwan. Report R28/0401, Athabasca University, Centre For Distance Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boguraev, B. & Kenned, C. (1999). “Applications of term identification technology: domain description and content characterization”, Natural Language Engineering 5(1): 17–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boguraev, B., Wong, Y. Y., Kennedy, C, Bellamy, R., Brawer, S., and Swartz, J. (1998). Dynamic presentation of document content for rapid on-line browsing. AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarization, Stanford, CA. 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brants, T. (2000). “TnT: A statistical part-of-speech tagger”, in Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (Seattle, WA), pp. 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherny, L. (1999). Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M. S. (1994). “Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory”, Org. Science, 5(2), 121–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dönmez, P., Rosé, C, Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (2005). “Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology”, CSCL V5: Proceedings of Th 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Taipei, Taiwan. 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, T. Herring, S. & Sack, W. (2002). Discourse Architectures: Designing and Visualizing Computer-Mediated Communication. Workshop at the CHI 2002 Conference, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. L. (1989). “The effectiveness of a nonsyntactic approach to automatic phrase indexing for document retrieval”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(2): 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, P.J. (2003). “Indicators of support in online interaction”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1). Retrieved June 13, 2006 from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/129/209

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, P.J., Crawford, G. & Ally, M. (2001). “Patterns of interaction in a computer conference transcript”, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2 (1). Retrieved June 13, 2006 from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/36/74

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hearne, B. & Nielsen, A. (2004). “Catch a cyber by the tale: Online orality and the lore of a distributed learning community”, in Haythornthwaite, C. & Kazmer, M. M. (Eds.) (pp. 59–87). Learning, Culture and Community in Online Education: Research and Practice. NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring S. C. (1996). “Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication”, in R. Kling (Ed.) Computerization and Controversy. 2nd edition. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C. (1994). “Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: _Bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier.” Presented at American Library Association convention, Miami, FL. Retrieved June 13, 2006 from: http://www.cpsr.org/prevsite/cpsr/gender/herring.txt

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C. (2000). “Gender Differences in CMC: Findings and Implications”, CPSR Newsletter, 18(1). Retrieved June 13, 2006 from: http://www.cpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C. (2003). “Dynamic topic analysis of synchronous chat”, Symposium on New Research for New Media, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Retrieved June 5, 2006 from: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/dta.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C., Scheidt, L.A., Kouper, I. & Wright, E. (in press). “A longitudinal content analysis of weblogs: 2003–2004”, in M. Tremayne (Ed.), Blogging, Citizenship and the Future of Media. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2006). Analyzing collaborative learning: Multiple approaches to understanding processes and outcomes. ICLS’ 06: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, Bloomington, Indiana. 1059–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddy, E.D. (1998). “Enhanced text retrieval using natural language processing”, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4). Available at: http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-98/liddy.html

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. L., Osborne, K. K. & Smith, C. B. (1995). “Standards of conduct on usenet”, in S. G. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community (pp 90–111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei, Q. & Zhai, C. (2005). “Discovering evolutionary themes patterns from text — an exploration of temporal text mining”, KDD’05 (Chicago, Illinois). 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooi, V. B. Y. (2000). “Aspects of computer-mediated communication for research in corpus linguistics”, Language and Computers, 36, 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S. & Sudweeks, F. (1997). “Networked interactivity”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Available online: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G. (1988). “Syntactic approaches to automatic book indexing”, in Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Buffalo, New York. 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. (1994). “Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees”, in Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing. Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sixl-Daniell, K. & Williams, J.B. (May 2005). Paralinguistic Discussion in an Online Educational Setting: A Preliminary Study. Retrieved June 13, 2006 from: http://www.u21global.edu.sg/portal/corporate/docs/wp_010-2005.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, B. & Barab, S. (forthcoming). “Why good design isn’t enough for websupported communities”, in R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), Handbook of Elearning Research, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.P. (1985). Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., Zubair, M., & Maly, K. (2006). “Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies”, in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Odense, Denmark, August 22–25, 2006). 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, C. (1997). “Fast statistical parsing of noun phrases for document indexing”, in Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Proessing, Washington, DC. 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haythornthwaite, C., Gruzd, A. (2007). A Noun Phrase Analysis Tool for Mining Online Community Conversations. In: Steinfield, C., Pentland, B.T., Ackerman, M., Contractor, N. (eds) Communities and Technologies 2007. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-904-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-905-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics