Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Approximately 5 million patients present to the emergency department (ED) for chest pain-related complaints every year [1]. In addition, a signifi cant number of patients may present to the ED with atypical symptoms. Early diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may lead to a sig-nifi cant reduction in associated morbidity and mortality. ED physicians play an important role in the rapid diagnosis and management of patients with suspected ACS. This provides a diagnostic challenge to the emergency physician. In this chapter, we discuss various presentations of ACS and tools available for rapid diagnosis and immediate management of patients in the ED. In addition, we propose the development of algorithms for the appropriate triage of patients based on severity and diagnosis. We also discuss testing in the ED and prognostic information provided by it and its signifi cance in the subsequent management of the patient.
Chest pain represents one of three most common presenting symptoms by patients in the ED (along with abdominal complaints and fever). Approximately 1.4 million of these patients are admitted for management of unstable angina/ non—ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) [1, 2]. The remainder of the patients may still have serious and life-threatening conditions, such as aortic dissection and pulmonary embolism (Table 5.1). It is therefore necessary that a prompt diagnosis be made and that early recognition and treatment be instituted. It has been increasingly recognized that management of conditions constituting ACS has been inconsistent and not concurrent with guidelines. With frequent and important changes occurring in the field based on results of recent clinical trials, it is most appropriate to develop an algorithm-based management strategy that reduces the variability in the management of these patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nourjah P. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 1997 emergency department summary. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1999:304.
National Center for Health Statistics. Detailed diagnosis and procedures: national hospital discharge survey, 1996. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998:13.
Gibler WB, Cannon CP, Blomkalns AL, et al. Practical implementation of the guidelines for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:185–197.
Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Granger CB, et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 1999;281:707–713.
Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 2004;110:588–636.
Maisel AS, Braunwald E. Cardiac biomarkers: a contemporary status report. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine 2006;3:24–34.
Morrow DA, Braunwald E. Future of biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes: moving toward a multimarker strategy. Circulation 2003;108:250–252.
Jaffe AS. Elevations in cardiac troponin measurements: false false-positives. Cardio-vasc Tox 2001;1:87–92.
Aviles RJ, Askari AT, Lindahl B, et al. Troponin T levels in patients with acute coronary syndromes, with or without renal dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346: 2047–2052.
De Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Bentley JH, et al. The prognostic value of B-type natri-uretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2001;345: 1014–1021.
Newby LK, Christenson RH, Ohman EM, et al. Value of serial troponin T measures for early and late risk stratifi cation in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The GUSTO IIa Investigators. Circulation 1998;98:1853–1859.
French WJ. Trends in acute myocardial management: use of the National Registry of myocardial infarction in quality improvement. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85:5B–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Panjrath, G., Josephson, E.B., Herzog, E. (2008). Evaluation in the Emergency Department and Cardiac Biomarkers. In: Hong, M.K., Herzog, E. (eds) Acute Coronary Syndrome. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-869-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-869-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-868-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-869-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)