Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biopsies and Cytological Punctures

  • Chapter
Book cover Renal Cell Cancer

  • 1048 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abe M, Saitoh M. Selective renal tumour biopsy under ultrasonic guidance. Br J Urol 1992;70:7–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al Nazer M, Mourad WA. Successful grading of renal-cell carcinoma in fine-needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;22:223–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Aynati M, Chen V, Salama S et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:593–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brierly RD, Thomas PJ, Harrison NW et al. Evaluation of fine-needle aspiration cytology for renal masses. BJU Int 2000;85:14–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell SC, Novick AC, Herts B et al. Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: accuracy and morbidity. Urology 1997;50:25–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coel MN, Chalmers J. Percutaneous catheter transcaval tumor biopsy. Radiology 1975;116:222.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cozens NJ, Murchison JT, Allan PL et al. Conventional 15 G needle technique for renal biopsy compared with ultrasound-guided spring-loaded 18 G needle biopsy. Br J Radiol 1992;65:594–597.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dechet CB, Sebo T, Farrow G et al. Prospective analysis of intraoperative frozen needle biopsy of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 1999;162:1282–1284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dechet CB, Zincke H, Sebo TJ et al. Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 2003;169:71–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denton KJ, Cotton DW, Nakielny RA et al. Secondary tumour deposits in needle biopsy tracks: an underestimated risk? J Clin Pathol 1990;43:83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 2003;9:669–676.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:655–663.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons RP, Bush WH Jr, Burnett LL. Needle tract seeding following aspiration of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1977;118:865–867.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goethuys H, Van PH, Oyen R et al. The case against fine-needle aspiration cytology for small solid kidney tumors. Eur Urol 1996;29:284–287.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Granter SR, Renshaw AA. Fine-needle aspiration of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Analysis of six cases. Cancer 1997;81:122–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Granter SR, Perez-Atayde AR, Renshaw AA. Cytologic analysis of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 1998;84:303–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Granter SR, Renshaw AA. Cytologic analysis of renal angiomyolipoma: a comparison of radiologically classic and challenging cases. Cancer 1999;87:135–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton T. Trials probe new agents for kidney cancer. JAMA 2006;296:155–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harisinghani MG, Maher MM, Gervais DA et al. Incidence of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category III): should imaging-guided biopsy precede surgery? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:755–758.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayakawa M, Hatano T, Tsuji A et al. Patients with renal cysts associated with renal cell carcinoma and the clinical implications of cyst puncture: a study of 223 cases. Urology 1996;47:643–646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herts BR, Baker ME. The current role of percutaneous biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Semin Urol Oncol 1995;13:254–261.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamis-Dow CA, Choyke PL, Jennings SB et al. Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1996;198:785–788.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayson M, Sanders H. Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1998;51:203–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PT, Nazarian LN, Feld RI et al. Sonographically guided renal mass biopsy: indications and efficacy. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:749–753.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kato M, Suzuki T, Suzuki Y et al. Natural history of small renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of growth rate, histological grade, cell proliferation and apoptosis. J Urol 2004;172:863–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiser GC, Totonchy M, Barry JM. Needle tract seeding after percutaneous renal adenocarcinoma aspiration. J Urol 1986;136:1292–1293.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • la-Palma L, Pozzi-Mucelli R. Problematic renal masses in ultrasonography and computed tomography. Clin Imaging 1990;14:83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang EK, Macchia RJ, Gayle B et al. CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal cystic masses (Bosniak 3 and 2F): accuracy and impact on clinical management. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2518–2524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang H, Lindner V, de FM et al. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: assessment of 241 patients with >15-year follow-up. Cancer 2005;103:625–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leal JJ. A new procedure for biopsy of a solid renal mass: transurethral approach under fluoroscopic control. J Urol 1992;148:98–100.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Fanning CV. Can renal oncocytomas be distinguished from renal cell carcinoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens? A study of conventional smears in conjunction with ancillary studies. Cancer 2001;93:390–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novick A, Campbell S. Renal tumors. In Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughan E et al. (Eds). Campbell’s Urology. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2002, 2675–2678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendon RA, Stanietzky N, Panzarella T et al. The natural history of small renal masses. J Urol 2000;164:1143–1147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw AA, Granter SR, Cibas ES. Fine-needle aspiration of the adult kidney. Cancer 1997;81:71–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw AA, Lee KR, Madge R et al. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration in distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1997;41:987–994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M, Szolar D, Preidler K et al. Renal masses—-evaluation by amplitude coded colour Doppler sonography and multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. Acta Radiol 1999;40:457–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter F, Kasabian NG, Irwin RJ Jr et al. Accuracy of diagnosis by guided biopsy of renal mass lesions classified indeterminate by imaging studies. Urology 2000;55:348–352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES et al. Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1281–1287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Madsen LT, Bermejo CE et al. A renal mass in the setting of a nonrenal malignancy: when is a renal tumor biopsy appropriate? Cancer 2004;101:2195–2201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slywotzky C, Maya M. Needle tract seeding of transitional cell carcinoma following fine-needle aspiration of a renal mass. Abdom Imaging 1994;19:174–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review. Radiology 1991;178:253–258.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spahn M, Portillo FJ, Michel MS et al. Color duplex sonography vs. computed tomography: accuracy in the preoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2001;40:337–342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torp-Pedersen S, Juul N, Larsen T et al. US-guided fine needle biopsy of solid renal masses—-comparison of histology and cytology. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1991;137:41–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Truong LD, Todd TD, Dhurandhar B et al. Fine-needle aspiration of renal masses in adults: analysis of results and diagnostic problems in 108 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;20:339–349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendth AJ Jr, Garlick WB, Pantoja GE et al. Transcatheter biopsy of renal carcinoma invading the inferior vena cava. J Urol 1976;115:331–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiatrowska BA, Zakowski MF. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma: comparison of cytomorphologic features. Cancer 1999;87:161–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JS Jr. Evaluation and management of solid and cystic renal masses. J Urol 1998;159:1120–1133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BJ, Khan MA, McGovern F et al. Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management. J Urol 1999;161:1470–1474.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young NA, Mody DR, Davey DD. Misinterpretation of normal cellular elements in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens: observations from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:670–675.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zardawi IM. Renal fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1999;43:184–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Intan P.E.D. Kümmerlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fiebo J.W. Ten Kate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette MD,PhD (Chairman) (Chairman)

  2. Department of Medical Oncology, San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy

    Cora N. Sternberg MD,FACP (Chairman) (Chairman)

  3. Department of Urology, University Hospital of Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Hein P.A. van Poppel MD,PhD (Chairman) (Chairman)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kümmerlin, I.P., Ten Kate, F.J. (2008). Biopsies and Cytological Punctures. In: Rosette, J.J.d., Sternberg, C.N., Poppel, H.P.v. (eds) Renal Cell Cancer. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-763-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-763-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-385-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-763-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation