Skip to main content

Duality and the Duality Controversy

  • Chapter
  • 1671 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series ((SUMS))

Abstract

We have seen that Poncelet used a way (in a sense, discovered by Brianchon) of pairing each point of the plane with a line, called the polar of the point, and each line in the plane with a point, called its pole. All that was needed for this was a conic. Any conic will do, and if a different conic is chosen the details of which point is paired with which line is changed, but nothing else. We also saw that the process of starting from a point (a pole) and producing a line (its polar) is the inverse of the process of starting from a line (a polar) and producing a point (its pole). We also saw that if three points lie on a line then their polars meet in a point and, conversely, if three lines meet in a point then their poles lie on a line. (See Figure 5.1.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Duality and the Duality Controversy. In: Worlds Out of Nothing. Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-633-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics