Skip to main content

Soft Computing Models for Fault Diagnosis of Conductive Flow Systems

  • Chapter
Computational Intelligence in Fault Diagnosis

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the fault diagnosis of artefacts often met in industry, but not only, that execute various functions involving conductive flows of matter and energy, i.e., multifunctional conductive flow systems (MCFSs). The proposed MCFS abstraction is close to the human diagnostician way of conceiving entities and relations on physical, functional and behavioural structures. Diagnosis reasoning, performed by human diagnosticians, is intrinsically abductive reasoning. This chapter presents the abduction by plausibility and relevance in a connectionist approach. The case study on a hydraulic installation of a rolling mill plant gives examples on the knowledge elicitation process and on the diagnostic expert system building and running.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ariton V, Ariton D (2000) A General Approach for Diagnostic Problems Solving by Abduction. In: Proceedings of IFAC-SAFEPROCESS, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 446–451

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ariton V (2001) Abstraction Levels for the Fault Isolation in Multifunctional Conductive Flow Systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th IFAC/IFORS/IMACS/IFIP/Symposium on Large Scale Systems-Theory and Applications, Bucharest, Romania, pp. 386–391

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ariton V, Baciu C (2002) Knowledge Elicitation and Case Tool for Fault Diagnosis in Multifunctional Conductive Flow Systems. In: Proceedings of SCI2002-6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, Florida, USA, July 14–18, vol. XXII, pp. 345–350

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ariton V (2003) Deep and shallow knowledge in fault diagnosis. In: Palade V, Howlett RJ, Lakhmi J (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 7th International Conference, KES 2003, Oxford, UK, September 3–5, Proceedings, Springer-Verlag, pp.748–755

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ariton V, Palade V (2004) Human-like fault diagnosis using a neural network implementation of plausibility and relevance. Neural Computing & Applications (Springer-Verlag) 14(2):149–165

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ayeb B, Wang S, Ge J (1998) A Unified Model for Abduction-Based Reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 28(4):408–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bocaniala CD, Sa da Costa J, Palade V (2004) A Novel Fuzzy Classification Solution for Fault Diagnosis. International Journal of Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems 15(3–4):195–206

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bocaniala CD, Sa da Costa J, Palade V (2005) Fuzzy-based refinement of the fault diagnosis task in industrial devices. International Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 16(6): 599–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bylander T, Allemang D, Tanner MC, Josephson JR (1991) The Computational Complexity of Abduction. Artificial Intelligence 49:25–60

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Cherkassky V, Lari-Najafi H (1992) Data Representation for Diagnostic Neural Networks. IEEE Expert 7(5):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cellier FE (1995) Modelling from Physical Principles. In: Levine WS (ed) The Control Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp.98–108

    Google Scholar 

  12. Calado JMF, Korbicz J, Patan K, Patton RJ, Sa da Costa MG (2001) Soft Computing Approaches to Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. European Journal of Control 7(2–3):248–286

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cordier MO, Dague P, Dumas M, Lévy F, Motmain J, Staroswiecki M, Travé-Massuyès L (2000) AI and Automatic Control Approaches of Model-Based Diagnosis: Links and Underlying Hypotheses. In: Proceedings of IFACSAFEPROCESS, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 274–279

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davis R (1993) Retrospective on “Diagnostic Reasoning Based on Structure and Behaviour”. Artificial Intelligence 59:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois D, Prade H (1998) Possibility Theory: Qualitative and Quantitative Aspects. In: Gabbay DM, Smets P (eds) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol 1, pp. 120–159, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Kleer J, Kurien J (2003) Fundamentals of Model-Based Diagnosis. Proceedings of IFAC-SAFEPROCESS, Washington, USA, pp. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  17. Konolige K (1992) Abduction Versus Closure in Causal Theories. Artificial Intelligence 53:255–272

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kruse R, Gebhardt J, Klawon F (1994) Foundations of Fuzzy Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuipers BJ (1994) Qualitative Reasoning: Modelling and Simulation with Incomplete Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larsson JE (1992) Knowledge-based methods for control systems. PhD Thesis, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mosterman PJ, Biswas G (2002) A Hybrid Modelling and Simulation Methodology for Dynamic Physical Systems. In: SIMULATION: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International, 78(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosterman PJ, Kapadia R, Biswas G (1995) Using bond graphs for diagnosis of dynamical physical systems. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Principles of Diagnosis, pp. 81–85

    Google Scholar 

  23. O’Brien T (1970) Reliability of Multifunction Structures. New York University

    Google Scholar 

  24. Okuda K, Miyasaka N (1991) Model based intelligent monitoring and real time diagnosis. In: Isermann R (ed) Preprints of SAFEPROCESS’ 91

    Google Scholar 

  25. Opdahl AL, Sindre G (1994) A taxonomy for real-world modelling concepts. Information Systems 19(3): 229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Palade V, Patton RJ, Uppal FJ, Quevedo J, Daley S (2002) Fault diagnosis of an industrial gas turbine using neuro-fuzzy methods. In: Proceedings of the 15th IFAC World Congress, 21–26 July, Barcelona, pp. 2477–2482

    Google Scholar 

  27. Patton RJ, Frank PM, Clark RN (2000) Issues of Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Springer-Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peng Y, Reggia J (1990) Abductive Inference Models for Diagnostic Problem Solving. Springer-Verlag, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Schurz G (2002) Models of Abductive Reasoning. TPD Preprints Annual 2002, no.1, University of Düsseldorf, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shibata B, Tateno S, Tsuge Y, Matsuyama H (1991) Fault diagnosis of the chemical process utilizing signed directed graph. In: Isermann R (ed) Preprints of Fault Detection Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes-SAFEPROCESS’ 91, pp.381–386

    Google Scholar 

  31. Struss P (1997) Model-based and qualitative reasoning: An introduction. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 19: 355–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Turksen IB (1996) Non-Specificity and Interval-Values Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 80:87–100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Uppal FJ, Patton RJ, Palade V (2002) Neuro-Fuzzy Based Fault Diagnosis Applied to an Electro-Pneumatic Valve. In: Proceedings of the 15th IFAC World Congress, 21–26 July, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2483–2488

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ariton, V. (2006). Soft Computing Models for Fault Diagnosis of Conductive Flow Systems. In: Palade, V., Jain, L., Bocaniala, C.D. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Fault Diagnosis. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-631-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-631-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-343-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-631-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics