Abstract
Medical imaging is essential for state-of-the-art diagnosis, surgical treatment and follow-up in individuals undergoing ureteroscopy. The imaging utilized has evolved from the use of plain films and intravenous pyelograms (IVP) with long acquisition times to spiral CT imaging with rapid image acquisition, high sensitivity and specificity. Although these advances in imaging have improved patient care, they have produced a moderate to significant increase in radiation exposure. Since the effects of radiation are not immediately perceived by the patient or the physician, their inherent risks may be easily overlooked. It is important that the urologic surgeon consider the potential risks and benefits of all imaging modalities prior to employing them.
Recently, concerns regarding increasing patient radiation exposure from medical imaging have led the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to call for a reduction in exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures. In order to ensure high quality healthcare while optimizing patient safety it becomes essential for the treating physician to develop a clear understanding of the units of radiation exposure, the amount of radiation provided by different diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, the potential risks associated with this radiation exposure and the reduced radiation alternatives currently available. By adhering to the principles outlined in this chapter for the appropriate utilization of ionizing radiation, the urologic surgeon can achieve optimal outcomes with a significant reduction in risk for both the patient and staff.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Young HH, Frontz WA, Baldwin JC. Congenital obstruction of the posterior urethra. J Urol. 1919;3:289–365. J Urol. 2002;167(1):265–67; discussion 268.
Kavoussi L, Clayman RV, Basler J. Flexible, actively deflectable fiberoptic ureteronephroscopy. J Urol. 1989;142(4):949–54.
Higashihara E, et al. Laser ureterolithotripsy with combined rigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Urol. 1990;143(2):273–4.
Grasso M, Bagley D. A 7.5/8.2 F actively deflectable, flexible ureteroscope: a new device for both diagnostic and therapeutic upper urinary tract endoscopy. Urology. 1994;43(4):435–41.
Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231:393–8.
Doctors “shocked” by radiation overexposure at Cedars-Sinai. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/CancerPreventionAndTreatment/doctors-shocked-radiation-exposure/story?id=8818377. Accessed 8 Dec 2011.
Radiation overdoses from CT scans lead to maladies in patients. http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2010/08/radiation_overdoses_from_ct_sc.html. Accessed 23 Oct 2011.
Illinois medical malpractice blog. http://medicalmalpractice.levinperconti.com/radiation_injury/. Accessed 23 Oct 2011.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277–84.
de Berrington Gonzalez A, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071–7.
White Paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm. Accessed 8 Dec 2011.
Greene R. Fleischner Lecture. Imaging the respiratory system in the first few years after discovery of the X-ray: contributions of Francis H. Williams, M.D. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159(1):1–7.
Leucutia T. Heuristic gems from the American Radium Society. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1974;121(3):653–60.
Coppes-Zantinga AR, Coppes MJ. Madame Marie Curie (1867–1934): a giant connecting two centuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(6):1453–7.
Langland OE, Langlais RP. Early pioneers of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80(5):496–511.
Feinendegen LE. Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(925):3–7.
Wolff S. The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106 Suppl 1:277–83.
Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA. Toxicology rethinks its central belief. Nature. 2003;421(6924):691–2.
Puskin JS. Perspective on the use of LNT for radiation protection and risk assessment by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Dose Response. 2009;7(4):284–91.
Hoel DG, Li P. Threshold models in radiation carcinogenesis. Health Phys. 1998;75(3):241–50.
Questions and answers about biological effects and potential hazards of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet56/oet56e4.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2011.
Ng KH. Non-ionizing radiations- sources, biological effects, emissions, and exposures. Proceedings of the International Conference on Non-ionizing Radiation at UNITEN. Oct. 20th-22nd, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia. 2003. p. 1–16.
Groves AM, et al. 16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(920):662–5.
Jacobi W. The concept of the effective dose–a proposal for the combination of organ doses. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1975;12(2):101–9.
Frequently asked questions. http://www.radprocalculator.com/FAQ.aspx. Accessed 23 Dec 2011.
Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology. 2010;257(1):246–53.
Jaworowski Z. Radiation risk and ethics. Phys Today. 1999;52(9):24–9.
Standards for protection against radiation: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final rule. Fed Regist. 1991;56(98):23360–474.
Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot. 2008;28(2):161–8.
Koenig TR, Mettler FA, Wagner LK. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 2, review of 73 cases and recommendations for minimizing dose delivered to patient. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(1):13–20.
Koenig TR, et al. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(1):3–11.
Miller DL, et al. Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures. Radiology. 2002;225(2):329–36.
Smith JC, et al. Ultra-low-dose protocol for CT-guided lung biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(4):431–6.
Paulino AC, et al. Normal tissue development, homeostasis, senescence, and the sensitivity to radiation injury across the age spectrum. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010;20(1):12–20.
Sodickson A, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251(1):175–84.
Sampaio FJB, BA, Bohle A, Billis A, et al. Urological survey: editorial comment re: computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33(6):854–77.
Delongchamp RR, et al. Cancer mortality among atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. Radiat Res. 1997;147(3):385–95.
Jellison FC, et al. Effect of low dose radiation computerized tomography protocols on distal ureteral calculus detection. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2762–7.
Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res. 2000;154(2):178–86.
Preston DL, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res. 2007;168(1):1–64.
Brenner DJ, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):13761–6.
Abdominal X-ray procedure & cost information. http://newchoicehealth.com/Directory/Procedure/81/Abdominal%20X-Ray. Accessed 8 Dec 2011.
Heidenreich A, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol. 2002;41(4):351–62.
Mettler FA, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248(1):254–63.
Levine JA, et al. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997;204(1):27–31.
Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP. Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology. 2003;228(2):319–29.
Passerotti C, et al. Ultrasound versus computerized tomography for evaluating urolithiasis. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1829–34.
Pfister SA, et al. Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(11):2513–20.
Chen MYM, Zagoria RJ. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic? J Emerg Med. 1999;17(2):299–303.
Grisi G, et al. Cost analysis of different protocols for imaging a patient with acute flank pain. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(10):1620–7.
Katayama H, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990;175(3):621–8.
Goldenberg I, Matetzky S. Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies. CMAJ. 2005;172(11):1461–71 (vol 173(10), p. 1210, 2005).
Dalrymple NC, et al. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1998;159(3):735–40.
Ng WH, Lee PSF, Chan HCA, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of protocol driven intravenous urogram performed by radiographers. J HK Coll Radiol. 2003;6:86–9.
Shokeir AA, et al. Diagnosis of ureteral obstruction in patients with compromised renal function: the role of noninvasive imaging modalities. J Urol. 2004;171(6):2303–6.
MRI cost & MRI procedure introduction. http://newchoicehealth.com/MRI-Cost. Accessed 8 Dec 2011.
Vrtiska TJ. Quantitation of stone burden: imaging advances. Urol Res. 2005;33(5):398–402.
Sandhu C, Anson KM, Patel U. Urinary tract stones—part 1: role of radiological Imaging in diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Radiol. 2003;58(6):415–21.
Hoppe H, et al. Alternate or additional findings to stone disease on unenhanced computerized tomography for acute flank pain can impact management. J Urol. 2006;175(5):1725–30.
Jaffe TA, et al. Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(4):1141–7.
McNicholas MMJ, et al. Excretory phase CT urography for opacification of the urinary collecting system. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(5):1261–7.
Silverman SG, Leyendecker JR, Amis ES. What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract? Radiology. 2009;250(2):309–23.
Caoili EM, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology. 2002;222(2):353–60.
Stabin M, et al. Radiation-dosimetry for technetium-99 m-MAG3, technetium-99 m-DTPA, and iodine-131-OIH based on human biodistribution studies. J Nucl Med. 1992;33(1):33–40.
Taylor A, Schuster DM, Alazraki A, editors. Clinician’s guide to nuclear medicine. 1st ed. Reston: Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.; 2000. p. 45–56.
Chen MYM, Pope Thomas L. Jr, Ott DJ. Basic radiology. 1st ed. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. New York, 2004. p. 15–8.
Jamal JE, et al. Perioperative patient radiation exposure in the endoscopic removal of upper urinary tract calculi. J Endourol. 2011;25(11):1747–51.
Bagley DH, Cublergoodman A. Radiation exposure during ureteroscopy. J Urol. 1990;144(6):1356–8.
Krupp N, et al. Fluoroscopic organ and tissue-specific radiation exposure by sex and body mass index during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2010;24(7):1067–72.
Giblin JG, et al. Radiation risk to the urologist during endourologic procedures, and a new shield that reduces exposure. Urology. 1996;48(4):624–7.
Ferrandino MN, et al. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol. 2009;181(2):668–72. discussion 673.
Kocher KE, et al. National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(5):452–62.e3.
Miller OF, Kane CJ. Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education. J Urol. 1999;162(3 Pt 1):688–90. discussion 690–1.
Hamm M, et al. Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain. J Urol. 2002;167(4):1687–91.
Zilberman DE, et al. Low dose computerized tomography for detection of urolithiasis-its effectiveness in the setting of the urology clinic. J Urol. 2011;185(3):910–4.
Poletti PA, et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(4):927–33.
Jin DH, et al. Effect of reduced radiation CT protocols on the detection of renal calculi. Radiology. 2010;255(1):100–7.
Heldt JP, et al. Ureteral calculi detection accuracy using low-dose computed tomography protocols is compromised in overweight and underweight patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:A93–A4.
Kalra MK, et al. Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with Z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. Radiology. 2005;235(2):523–9.
O’Malley ME, et al. Comparison of low dose with standard dose abdominal/pelvic multidetector CT in patients with stage 1 testicular cancer under surveillance. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(7):1624–30.
Chow LC, et al. Split-bolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(2):314–22.
Dahlman P, et al. Optimization of computed tomography urography protocol, 1997 to 2008: effects on radiation dose. Acta Radiol. 2009;50(4):446–54.
Ngo TC, et al. Tracking intraoperative fluoroscopy utilization reduces radiation exposure during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2011;25(5):763–7.
Ionising radiation safety. http://www.e-radiography.net/radsafety/radsafety.htm. Accessed 8 Dec 2011.
Cocuzza M, et al. Use of inverted fluoroscope’s C-arm during endoscopic treatment of urinary tract obstruction in pregnancy: a practicable solution to cut radiation. Urology. 2010;75(6):1505–8.
Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Prevalence of orthopedic complaints among endourologists and their compliance with radiation safety measures. J Endourol. 2011;25(10):1609–13.
Hellawell GO, et al. Radiation exposure and the urologist: what are the risks? J Urol. 2005;74(3):948–52. discussion 952.
Chodick G, et al. Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(6):620–31.
Tse V, et al. Radiation exposure during fluoroscopy: should we be protecting our thyroids? Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69(12):847–8.
Reilly AJ, Sutton DG. A computer model of an image intensifier system working under automatic brightness control. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(886):938–48.
Nakamura A, et al. Increased radiation dose by automatic exposure control system during fluoroscopy and angiography of pelvis due to contrast material in the bladder: experimental study. Radiat Med. 2004;22(4):225–32.
Bushberg J, Seiberd JA, Leidholdt EM, et al. The essential physics of medical imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippencott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
Herrmann K, et al. Initial experiences with pulsed fluoroscopy on a multifunctional fluoroscopic unit. Rofo. 1996;165(5):475–9.
Holmes DR, et al. Effect of pulsed progressive fluoroscopy on reduction of radiation-dose in the Cardiac-Catheterization Laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(1):159–62.
Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM. Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(5):1247–53.
Greene DJ, et al. Comparison of a reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol to conventional fluoroscopy during uncomplicated ureteroscopy. Urology. 2011;78(2):286–90.
Stewart A, Webb J, Hewitt D. A survey of childhood malignancies. Br Med J. 1958;1(5086):1495–508.
Monson RR, MacMahon B. Radiation carcinogenesis: epidemiology and biological significance prenatal X-ray exposure and cancer in children. New York: Raven; 1984.
Harvey EB, et al. Prenatal X-ray exposure and childhood cancer in twins. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(9):541–5.
Alzen G, Benz-Bohm G. Radiation protection in pediatric radiology. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(24):407–14.
Brenner D, et al. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):289–96.
Bertell R, Ehrle LH, Schmitz-Feuerhake I. Pediatric CT research elevates public health concerns: low-dose radiation issues are highly politicized. Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(3):419–39.
Nickoloff E. Current adult and pediatric CT doses. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(4):250–60.
Routh JC, Graham DA, Nelson CP. Epidemiological trends in pediatric urolithiasis at United States freestanding pediatric hospitals. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1100–4.
VanDervoort K, et al. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: a single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. J Urol. 2007;177(6):2300–5.
Pietrow PK, et al. Clinical outcome of pediatric stone disease. J Urol. 2002;167(2):670–3.
Johnson EK, et al. Are stone protocol computed tomography scans mandatory for children with suspected urinary calculi? Urology. 2011;78(3):662–6.
Srirangam SJ, Hickerton B, Van Cleynenbreugel B. Management of urinary calculi in pregnancy: a review. J Endourol. 2008;22(5):867–75.
Stothers L, Lee LM. Renal colic in pregnancy. J Urol. 1992;148(5):1383–7.
McAleer SJ, Loughlin KR. Nephrolithiasis and pregnancy. Curr Opin Urol. 2004;14(2):123–7.
Shokeir AA, Mahran MR, Abdulmaaboud M. Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index. Urology. 2000;55(3):344–7.
Di Salvo DN. Sonographic imaging of maternal complications of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(1):69–89.
Laing FC, et al. Distal ureteral calculi: detection with vaginal US. Radiology. 1994;192(2):545–8.
Lewis DF, et al. Urolithiasis in pregnancy. Diagnosis, management and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(1):28–32.
Loughlin KR, Ker LA. The current management of urolithiasis during pregnancy. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29(3):701–4.
White WM, et al. Low-dose computed tomography for the evaluation of flank pain in the pregnant population. J Endourol. 2007;21(11):1255–60.
Travassos M, et al. Ureteroscopy in pregnant women for ureteral stone. J Endourol. 2009;23(3):405–7.
Lifshitz DA, Lingeman JE. Ureteroscopy as a first-line intervention for ureteral calculi in pregnancy. J Endourol. 2002;16(1):19–22.
Akpinar H, et al. Ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy in pregnancy: stents must be used postoperatively. J Endourol. 2006;20(2):107–10.
Loughlin KR. Management of acute ureteral obstruction in pregnancy utilizing ultrasound-guided placement of ureteral stents. Urology. 1994;43(3):412.
Jarrard DJ, Gerber GS, Lyon ES. Management of acute ureteral obstruction in pregnancy utilizing ultrasound-guided placement of ureteral stents. Urology. 1993;42(3):263–7. discussion 267–8.
Semins MJ, Trock BJ, Matlaga BR. The safety of ureteroscopy during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2009;181(1):139–43.
Radiation basics. http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/faqs/radiation.html. Accessed 22 Dec 2011.
SI radiation measurement units: conversion factors. http://www.stevequayle.com/ARAN/rad.conversion.html. Accessed 23 Dec 2011.
Radiation safety guide. http://web.princeton.edu/sites/ehs/radsafeguide/rsg_app_e.htm#10. Accessed 23 Dec 2011.
The millisievert and milligray as measures of radiation dose and exposure. http://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/Radiation_definitions.html. Accessed 23 Dec 2011.
How are different amounts of radiation expressed? http://www.radiation-scott.org/radsource/2-0.htm. Accessed 23 Dec 2011.
Brenner DJ. Are X-ray backscatter scanners safe for airport passenger screening? For most individuals, probably yes, but a billion scans per year raises long-term public health concerns. Radiology. 2011;259(1):6–10.
Medvedev G. Chernoybl notebook. Novy Mir. 1989;(6):3–108.
Weinberg HSH, Korol AB, Kirzhner VM, Avivi A, et al. Very high mutation rate in offspring of Chernobyl accident liquidators. Proc Biol Sci. 2001;268(1471):1001–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnold, D.C., Baldwin, D.D. (2013). Radiation Safety During Ureteroscopy. In: Monga, M. (eds) Ureteroscopy. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-205-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-206-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)