Skip to main content

Urinary and Urologic Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Urologic Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Urologic Surgery

Abstract

Urinary complications are some of the more common complications of laparoscopic urologic surgery. The overall incidence of urinary tract injury following laparoscopy urologic surgery in large series is under 1% [1, 2]. These injuries can occur both in upper tract and in pelvic urologic laparoscopy. They include injures to the ureter, urinary leaks after extirpative and reconstructive procedures, bladder injuries, and anastomotic leaks. In general, urinary complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures is similar and is thus discussed together.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM, Romero FR, Bagga HS, Pavlovich CP, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Complications of 2,775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):580–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colombo JR Jr, Haber GP, Jelovsek JE, Nguyen M, Fergany A, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Gill IS. Complications of laparoscopic surgery for urological cancer: a single institution analysis. J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):786–91.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simmons MN, Gill IS. Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system. J Urol 2007;177:2067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Streem SB, Klein E, Licht M. Complications of nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors. J Urol. 1994;151:1177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wille AH, Tullmann M, Roigas J, Loening SA, Deger S. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in renal cell cancer – results and reproducibility by different surgeons in a high volume laparoscopic center. Eur Urol. 2006;49:337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meeks JJ, Zhao LC, Navai N, Perry KT Jr, Nadler RB, Smith ND. Risk factors and management of urine leaks after partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008 Dec;180(6):2375–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, Scarpa RM. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. Eur Urol. 2008 Apr;53(4):732–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. French DB, Marcovich R. Fibrin sealant for retrograde ureteroscopic closure of urine leak after partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2006 May;67(5):1085.e1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seo IY, Lee YH, Rim JS. Case report: percutaneous fibrin glue injection for urine leakage in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2008 May;22(5):959–62.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Razzaghi MR, Rezaei A, Javanmard B, Lotfi B. Desmopressin as an alternative solution for urinary leakage after ureterocaliceal surgeries. Urol J. 2009 Spring;6(2):120–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro E, Benway BM, Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. The role of nephron-sparing robotic surgery in the management of renal malignancy. Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):76–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol. 2008 Dec;26(6):539–47.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM, Romero FR, Bagga HS, Pavlovich CP, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Complications of 2,775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):580–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Braga LH, Pace K, Demaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol. 2009 Apr 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stany MP, Farley JH. Complications of gynecologic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Apr;88(2):343–59.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leonard F, Fotso A, Borghese B, et al. Ureteral complications from laparoscopic hysterectomy indicated for benign uterine pathologies: a 13-year experience in a continuous series of 1300 patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2006–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yaycioglu O, Ramakumar S, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Early repeated exploration after laparoscopic urologic surgery: comparison of clinical, radiologic, and surgical findings. Urology. 2002 Feb;59(2):190–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Patil NN, Mottrie A, Sundaram B, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch: a multi-institutional, multinational evaluation. Urology. 2008 Jul;72(1):47–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boukerrou M, Lambaudie E, Collinet P, et al. A history of cesareans is a risk factor in vaginal hysterectomies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:1135–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chan DP, Abujudeh HH, Cushing GL Jr, Novelline RA. CT cystography with multiplanar reformation for suspected bladder rupture: experience in 234 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):1296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williams TR, Longoria OJ, Asselmeier S, Menon M. Incidence and imaging appearance of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leaks following da Vinci robotic prostatectomy. Abdom Imaging. 2008 May–Jun;33(3):367–70.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Lay F, Barret E, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol. 2002 Jan;167(1):51–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Patil N, Krane L, Javed K, Williams T, Bhandari M, Menon M. Evaluating and grading cystographic leakage: correlation with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1108–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Ghavamian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hakimi, A.A., Ghavamian, R. (2010). Urinary and Urologic Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Urologic Procedures. In: Ghavamian, R. (eds) Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-676-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-676-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-675-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-676-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics