Skip to main content

Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Reconstructive Procedures for Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 937 Accesses

Abstract

Recognition of the impact of pelvic floor disorders in women has increased significantly in recent years. A contemporary study evaluating the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders including urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in US women demonstrated that 23.7% of women complain of at least one pelvic floor disorder [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300:1311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu CY. Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure). A review of 58 cases. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:526.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burch JC. Cooper’s ligament urethrovesical suspension for stress incontinence. Nine years’ experience – results, complications, techniques. 1968. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frankel G, Kantipong M. Sixteen-month experience with video-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic bladder neck suspension. J Endourol. 1995;9:259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Raboy A, Hakim LS, Ferzli G, et al. Extraperitoneal endoscopic vesicourethral suspension. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1993;3:505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper MJ, Cario G, Lam A, et al. A review of results in a series of 113 laparoscopic colposuspensions. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36:44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolf JS Jr, Monk TG, McDougall EM, et al. The extraperitoneal approach and subcutaneous emphysema are associated with greater absorption of carbon dioxide during laparoscopic renal surgery. J Urol. 1995;154:959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized comparison of one or two sutures on each side of the urethra. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zullo F, Palomba S, Russo T, et al. Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;117:201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carey MP, Goh JT, Rosamilia A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2006;113:999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan MS, Challacombe B, Rose K, et al. Robotic colposuspension: two case reports. J Endourol. 2007;21:1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Phelps JY, Lin L, Liu CY. Laparoscopic suburethral sling procedure. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10: 496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brenner B. Comparing the laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and the suburethral sling. N Z Med J. 2001;114:146.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Meltomaa S, Haarala M, Makinen J, et al. Endoscopic colposuspension with simplified extraperitoneal approach. Tech Urol. 1997;3:216.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Saidi MH, Gallagher MS, Skop IP, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic colposuspension: short-term cure rate, complications, and duration of hospital stay in comparison with Burch colposuspension. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92: 619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Myers DL, Peipert JF, Rosenblatt PL, et al. Patient satisfaction with laparoscopic Burch retropubic urethropexy. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:939.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Speights SE, Moore RD, Miklos JR. Frequency of lower urinary tract injury at laparoscopic Burch and paravaginal repair. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferland RD, Rosenblatt P. Ureteral compromise after laparoscopic Burch colpopexy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6:217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Albright TS, Garlich CL, Iglesia CB. Complications after laparoscopic Burch with hernia mesh and surgical tacks. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kitchener HC, Dunn G, Lawton V, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension—results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2006;113:1007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore RD, Speights SE, Miklos JR. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Radomski SB, Herschorn S. Laparoscopic Burch bladder neck suspension: early results. J Urol. 1996;155:515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu CY. Laparoscopic treatment for genuine urinary stress incontinence. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;8:789.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu CY. Laparoscopic treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999;26:149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Margossian H, Pollard RR, Walters MD. Small bowel obstruction in a peritoneal defect after laparoscopic Burch procedure. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6:343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Kohorn EI, et al. The value of urodynamic testing in stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1980;124:256.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, et al. Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1997;158:875.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat CR, et al. Laparoscopic retropubic cystourethropexy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;1:339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Miannay E, Cosson M, Lanvin D, et al. Comparison of open retropubic and laparoscopic colposuspension for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;79:159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fatthy H, El Hao M, Samaha I, et al. Modified Burch colposuspension: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ou CS, Rowbotham R. Five-year follow-up of laparoscopic bladder neck suspension using synthetic mesh and surgical staples. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9:249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Paraiso MF, Walters MD. Laparoscopic surgery for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48:724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kwon CH, Culligan PJ, Koduri S, et al. The development of pelvic organ prolapse following isolated Burch retropubic urethropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wiskind AK, Creighton SM, Stanton SL. The incidence of genital prolapse after the Burch colposuspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:399.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1418.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hsiao KC, Latchamsetty K, Govier FE, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol. 2007;21:926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, et al. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Behnia-Willison F, Seman EI, Cook JR, et al. Laparoscopic paravaginal repair of anterior compartment prolapse. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Daneshgari F, Paraiso MF, Kaouk J, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic female pelvic floor reconstruction. BJU Int. 2006;98 Suppl 1:62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cundiff GW, Fenner D. Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocele: focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Salet-Lizee D, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, et al. Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, et al. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes. BJU Int. 2007;100:875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol. 2006;176:655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sarlos D, Brandner S, Kots L, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rivoire C, Botchorishvili R, Canis M, et al. Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cheret A, Von Theobald P, Lucas J, et al. Laparoscopic promontofixation feasibility study in 44 patients. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001;30:139.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Downing KT. Vertebral osteomyelitis and epidural abscess after laparoscopic uterus-preserving cervicosacropexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol. 2005;47:230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wattiez A, Mashiach R, Donoso M. Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15:315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kohli N, Walsh PM, Roat TW, et al. Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG. 2005;112:1134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ross JW, Preston M. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five-year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Stepanian AA, Miklos JR, Moore RD, et al. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Patel M. A reconstructive option for large vaginal mesh exposures using a porcine small intestinal submucosa graft. SUFU 2009 Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ross JW. The use of a xenogenic barrier to prevent mesh erosion with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Elneil S, Cutner AS, Remy M, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series. BJOG. 2005;112:486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Descargues G, Collard P, Grise P. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: laparoscopic or vaginal sacrocolpopexy? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008;36:978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Beer M, Kuhn A. Surgical techniques for vault prolapse: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;119:144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvaro Lucioni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lucioni, A., Kobashi, K.C. (2010). Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Reconstructive Procedures for Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse. In: Ghavamian, R. (eds) Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-676-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-676-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-675-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-676-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics