Abstract
Models of ongoing monitoring and early reintervention occupy a central role in the long-term management of several chronic medical conditions. Such models require adaptations to address additional challenges that are common in addiction management, such as social isolation, alienation, residential instability, and multiple co-occurring problems. While the addiction field has historically been plagued by high attrition rates, utilizing a standardized tracking model (Scott, Drug Alcohol Depend 74:21–36, 2004) demonstrates the feasibility of providing ongoing monitoring via quarterly checkups. This chapter describes the Tracking, Assessing, Linking, Engaging and Retaining (TALER) protocol that was used to successfully implement Recovery Management Checkups (RMC) in two experiments involving approximately 900 participants. Results from the two experiments also demonstrate that random assignment to RMC (1) reduces both the time to readmission and the time spent in the community using and (2) increases both levels of treatment participation and rates of abstinence. In addition, the size of the effects was larger, depending on (a) the modifications made to the second experiment and (b) the length of time that RMC was used in the second experiment. Several potential benefits from adapting the RMC approach have been identified. They include better linkage to recovery support services, greater frequency of monitoring, expansion of the protocol to address co-occurring problems; and replication in other communities or subgroups such as offenders and adolescents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Scott CK. A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;74:21–36.
Scott CK, Foss MA, Dennis ML. Utilizing recovery management checkups to shorten the cycle of relapse, treatment reentry, and recovery. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;78:325–38.
Scott CK, Foss MA, Dennis ML. Pathways in the relapse, treatment, and recovery cycle over three years. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005;28:S63–72.
Simpson DD, Joe GW, Broome KM. A national 5-year follow-up of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:538–44.
Hser YI, Grella CE, Chou C-P, Anglin MD. Relationships between drug treatment careers and outcomes: findings from the National Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study. Eval Rev. 1998;22:496–519.
Godley MD, Godley SH, Dennis ML, Funk RR, Passetti LL. The effect of Assertive Continuing Care on continuing care linkage, adherence, and abstinence following residential treatment for adolescents with substance use disorders. Addiction. 2007;102:81–93.
Office of Applied Studies Treatment Episode Data Set – Discharges (TEDS-D), 2006. ICPSR24461-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. 2009; 2009-06-22. doi:10.3886/ICPSR24461.
Dennis ML, Scott CK, Funk R, Foss MA. The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005;28:S51–62.
Darke S, Ross J, Teesson M. The australian treatment outcome study (ATOS): what have we learnt about treatment for heroin dependence? Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007;26(1):49–54.
Gibson AE, Degenhardt LJ, Hall WD. Opioid overdose deaths can occur in patients with naltrexone implants. Med J Aust. 2007;186:152–3.
Kristenson H, Osterling A, Nilsson JA, Lindgärde F. Prevention of alcohol-related deaths in middle-aged heavy drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:478–84.
Brugal MT, Domingo-Salvany A, Puig R, Barrio G, Garcia DO, de la Fuente L. Evaluating the impact of methadone maintenance programs on mortality due to overdose and aids in a cohort of heroin users in Spain. Addiction. 2005;100:981–9.
Quan VM, Vongchak T, Jittiwutikarn J, Kawichai S, Srirak N, Wiboonnatakul K, et al. Predictors of mortality among injecting and non-injecting HIV-negative users in northern Thailand. Addiction. 2007;102:441–6.
Copeland L, Budd J, Robertson JR, Elton RA. Changing patterns in causes of death in a cohort of injecting drug users, 1980–2001. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1214–20.
Farrell M, Marsden J. Acute risk of drug-related death among newly released prisoners in England and Wales. Addiction. 2008;103:251–5.
Gossop M, Stewart D, Treacy S, Marsden J. A prospective study of mortality among drug misusers during a 4-year period after seeking treatment. Addiction. 2002;97:39–47.
Saitz R, Gaeta J, Cheng DM, Richardson JM, Larson MJ, Samet JH. Risk of mortality during four years after substance detoxification in urban adults. J Urban Health. 2007;84:272–82.
Scott CK, Dennis ML, Laudet A, Funk RR, Simeone RS. Surviving drug addiction: Do treatment and adstinence reduce mortality? Am J Pub Health, in press.
Smyth B, Hoffman V, Fan J, Hser YI. Years of potential life lost among heroin addicts 33 years after treatment. Prev Med. 2007;44:369–74.
Cohen EH, Mowbray CT, Bybee D, Yeich S, Ribisl K, Freddolino PP. Tracking and follow-up methods for research on homelessness. Eval Rev. 1993;17:331–52.
Hansen WB, Tobler SN, Graham JW. Attrition in substance abuse prevention research. A meta-analysis of 85 longitudinal followed cohorts. Eval Rev. 1990;14:677–85.
Inciardi JA, Lockwood D, Pottieger AE. Women and crack-cocaine. New York: MacMillan; 1993.
Ziek K, Beardsley M, Deren S, Tortu S. Predictors of follow-up in a sample of urban crack users. Eval Program Plann. 1996;19:219–24.
Goldstein PJ, Abott W, Paige WI, Sobel I, Soto F. Tracking procedures in follow-up studies of drug abusers. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1977;4:21–30.
McCoy HV, Nurco DN. Locating subjects by traditional techniques. In Followup fieldwork: AIDS outreach and IV drug abuse: DHHS Publication No. 91-1736. Rockville, MD; 1991:31-73, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Scott CK, Dennis ML. Recovery Management Checkups: An Early Re-Intervention Model. Chicago: Chestnut Health Systems; 2003. Available from author.
Dennis ML, Scott CK. Managing substance use disorders (SUD) as a chronic condition. J Addic Sci Clin Prac. 2007;4:45–55.
Dennis ML, Titus JC, White M, Unsicker J, Hodgkins D. Global appraisal of individual needs (GAIN): administration guide for the GAIN and related measures. Version 5. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 2003.
Dennis ML, Scott CK, Funk R. An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Eval Program Plann. 2003;26:339–52.
Scott CK, Dennis ML. Results from two randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of quarterly recovery management checkups with adult chronic substance users. Addiction. 2009;104:959–71.
Orford J. Let’s keep in touch: you know it makes sense. Addiction. 2009;104:972–3.
McKay JR. Treating substance use disorders with adaptive continuing care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009.
Acknowledgments
This work was completed with support provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Grant No. DA 11323. The authors would like to thank Rod Funk and Joan Unsicker for their assistance in preparing the manuscript. The opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect official positions of the government. Any requests or comments may be sent to Dr. Christy K Scott, Chestnut Health Systems, 221 West Walton, Chicago IL 60610, 312-664-4321, cscott@chestnut.org.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scott, C.K., Dennis, M.L. (2010). Recovery Management Checkups with Adult Chronic Substance Users. In: Kelly, J., White, W. (eds) Addiction Recovery Management. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-960-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-960-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-959-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-960-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)