Abstract
Computerized order entry (COE) provides an opportunity to reduce a variety of prescribing errors. The improved legibility, reduction in transcription errors, real-time drug–drug interaction evaluation, and improved mechanisms for reconciliation of medications with proper patient identification make a strong argument for the adoption of such systems. There are some other considerations, however, which may detract from the overall positive image of electronic prescribing. This chapter provides perspective on the advantages and disadvantages that present with COE.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brown SH, Lincoln MJ, Groen PJ, Kolodner RM (2003) VistA – U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs national-scale HIS. Int J Med Inform 69:135–156. Online access http://www1.va.gov/cprsdemo/docs/VistA_Int_Jrnl_Article.pdf Accessed 9 Jan 2008
Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ et al (1998) Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors JAMA 280:1311–1316
Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A et al (2005) Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors JAMA 293:1197–1203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gloth, F.M. (2010). Computerized Order Entry. In: Koch, S., Gloth, F., Nay, R. (eds) Medication Management in Older Adults. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-457-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-457-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-456-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-457-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)