The decision to order diagnostic imaging in pregnancy is often filled with anxiety. Both the patient and provider may be fearful of the potential harmful effects of radiation on the fetus. The term radiation itself provokes images of atomic bombs and nuclear accidents. Although there is evidence that such massive doses of radiation may be associated with poor outcomes in pregnancy, it is the job of the clinician to educate women about the differences in dose and risk of radiation used in most diagnostic procedures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Report 60. Annals of the ICRP. 1990.
Limitation of Exposure to Ionizing radiation. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) Report 116.
Source and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Annex B: Exposure from natural radiation sources. 2000 United nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Report Volume 1, 2000.
Streffer C, Molls M. Cultures of preimplantation mouose embryos: a model for radiological studies. Adv Radiat Biology 1987;13:169–213.
Gu Y, Kai M, Kusama T. The embryonic and fetal effects in ICR mice irradiated in the various stages of the preimplantation perios. Radiat Res 1997;147:735–740.
Muller W-U, Streffer C. Lethal and teratogenic effects after exposure to X-rays at various times of early murine gestation. Teratology 1990;42:643–650.
Job TT, Leibold GJ, Fitzmaurice HA. Biological effects of roentgen rays; determination of critical periods in mammalian development with x-rays. Am J Anat 1935;56:97–117.
Russell LB, Russell WL. The effects of radiation on the preimplantation stages of the mouse embryo. Anat Rec 1950; 108:521.
Pampfer S, Streffer C. Prenatal death and malformations after irradiation of mouse zygotes with neutrons or X-rays. Teratology 1988;36:599–607.
Streffer C, Muller W-U. Malformations after radiation exposure of preimplantation stages. Int J Dev Biol 1996;40:335–360.
Kameyama Y. Low-dose radiation as an environmental agent affecting intrauterine development. Environ Med 1982;26:1–15.
Brent RL, Gorson RO. Radiation exposure in pregnancy. In: Moseley RD (Ed.) Current Problems in Radiology. Year Book Medical Publications Inc., Chicago, USA pp. 1–48.
Valentin J. Biological Effects after Prenatal Irradiation (embryo and fetus). Publication 90. Annals of ICRP. 2003;1–200.
Medical Radiation Exposure of Pregnant and Potentially Pregnant Women. Report of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. No. 54. 1977, July.
Blot WJ, Miller RW. Mental retardation following in utero exposure to the atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Radiology; 1973;106:617–619.
Blot WJ. Review of thirty years study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors. II. Biologic effect. C. Growth and development following prenatal and children exposure to atomic radiation. J Radiat Res 1975;16:82–88.
Miller RW, Mulvihill JJ. Small head size after atomic irradiation. Teratology 1976;14:355–358.
Blot WJ, Miller RW. Mental retardation following in utero exposure to the atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Radiology 1973;106:617–619.
Blot WJ. Review of thirty years study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors. II. Biological effect. C. Growth and development following prenatal and children exposure to atomic radiation. J Radiat Res 1975;16:82–88.
Miller RW, Blot WJ. Small head size after in utero exposure to atomic radiation. Lancet 1972;2:784–787.
Valentin J. Pregnancy and Radiation. Publication 84. Annals of the IRCP. 2000;30:1–43.
Osei EK, Faulkner K. Fetal doses from radiologic examinations. Br J Rad 1999;72:773–780.
Doshi S, Negus I, Oduko J. An assessment of fetal dose due to CT pulmonary angiography for suspected maternal pulmonary embolism. Scientific Meeting of the South West PPEM Group, 2004.
Kennedy EV, Iball GR, Brettle DS. Investigation into the effects of lead shielding for fetal dose reduction in CT pulmonary angiography. Br J Radiol 2007; 631–638.
Fry FA. International Chernobyl Project. Radiol Protect Bull 1991;124:12–18.
Harjulehto T, Aro T, Rita H, et al. The accident at Chernobyl and the outcome of pregnancy in Finland. Br Med J 1989;298:995–997.
Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J, Rainbow AJ, Caotes G. Risks to the fetus of radiologic procedures used in the diagnosis of maternal venous thromboembolic disease. Throm Haemost 1989;61:189–196.
Stewart A, Kneale GW. Radiation doses effects in relation to obstetric X-rays and childhood cancer. Lancet 1997;1(17658):1185–1188.
Knox EG, Stewart A, Kneale G. Prenatal irradiation and childhood cancer. J Soc Radiol Prot 1987;7:177–189.
NRPB Diagnostic Medical Exposures to Ionizing Radiation During Pregnancy and Estimates of Late Radiation Risks of the UK Populations. Documents of the NRPB, 1993;4(4), National Radiological Protection Board, UK.
Stewart A, Webb J, Giles D, Hewitt D. Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero. Lancet 1956; 271:447.
Biological Effects after prenatal Irradiation (Embryo and Fetus). Annals of the ICRP. Publication 90, 2003.
Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety. Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1335–1347.
Webb J, Thomsen H, Morcos SK, et al. The use of iodinated and gadolimium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:12434–1240.
Webb JA, Thomasen HS, Morcos SK; Members of Contrast Media Safety committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1234–1240.
DeSantis M, Straface G, Cavaliere AF, et al. Gadolinium periconceptional exposure: pregnancy and neonatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:99–101.
Manual on Contrast Media Version 5.0. American College of Radiology 2004;47–48.
American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast media. Administration of contrast Medium to Nursing Mothers, 2004–2007.
Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety and patient care. Radiology 2004;232:635–652.
Food US, Drug Administration. Magnetic resonance diagnostic device: Panel recommendation and report on petitions for MR reclassification. Fed Regist 1998;53:7575–7579.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Statement, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference (Washington, D.C., October 26–28, 1987). 1987;6(14): October 26.
Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. Am J Roentgenol 2007;118:1–27.
Radionuclide Exposure of the Embryo/Fetus. NCRP Report No. 128. Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 1998, September 25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller, M., Larson, L. (2009). Diagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy. In: Rosene-Montella, K., Bourjeily, G. (eds) Pulmonary Problems in Pregnancy. Respiratory Medicine. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-445-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-445-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-12-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-445-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)