Skip to main content

Diagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Respiratory Medicine ((RM))

The decision to order diagnostic imaging in pregnancy is often filled with anxiety. Both the patient and provider may be fearful of the potential harmful effects of radiation on the fetus. The term radiation itself provokes images of atomic bombs and nuclear accidents. Although there is evidence that such massive doses of radiation may be associated with poor outcomes in pregnancy, it is the job of the clinician to educate women about the differences in dose and risk of radiation used in most diagnostic procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Report 60. Annals of the ICRP. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Limitation of Exposure to Ionizing radiation. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) Report 116.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Source and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Annex B: Exposure from natural radiation sources. 2000 United nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Report Volume 1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Streffer C, Molls M. Cultures of preimplantation mouose embryos: a model for radiological studies. Adv Radiat Biology 1987;13:169–213.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gu Y, Kai M, Kusama T. The embryonic and fetal effects in ICR mice irradiated in the various stages of the preimplantation perios. Radiat Res 1997;147:735–740.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Muller W-U, Streffer C. Lethal and teratogenic effects after exposure to X-rays at various times of early murine gestation. Teratology 1990;42:643–650.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Job TT, Leibold GJ, Fitzmaurice HA. Biological effects of roentgen rays; determination of critical periods in mammalian development with x-rays. Am J Anat 1935;56:97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell LB, Russell WL. The effects of radiation on the preimplantation stages of the mouse embryo. Anat Rec 1950; 108:521.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pampfer S, Streffer C. Prenatal death and malformations after irradiation of mouse zygotes with neutrons or X-rays. Teratology 1988;36:599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Streffer C, Muller W-U. Malformations after radiation exposure of preimplantation stages. Int J Dev Biol 1996;40:335–360.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kameyama Y. Low-dose radiation as an environmental agent affecting intrauterine development. Environ Med 1982;26:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brent RL, Gorson RO. Radiation exposure in pregnancy. In: Moseley RD (Ed.) Current Problems in Radiology. Year Book Medical Publications Inc., Chicago, USA pp. 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Valentin J. Biological Effects after Prenatal Irradiation (embryo and fetus). Publication 90. Annals of ICRP. 2003;1–200.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Medical Radiation Exposure of Pregnant and Potentially Pregnant Women. Report of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. No. 54. 1977, July.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blot WJ, Miller RW. Mental retardation following in utero exposure to the atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Radiology; 1973;106:617–619.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Blot WJ. Review of thirty years study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors. II. Biologic effect. C. Growth and development following prenatal and children exposure to atomic radiation. J Radiat Res 1975;16:82–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller RW, Mulvihill JJ. Small head size after atomic irradiation. Teratology 1976;14:355–358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Blot WJ, Miller RW. Mental retardation following in utero exposure to the atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Radiology 1973;106:617–619.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blot WJ. Review of thirty years study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors. II. Biological effect. C. Growth and development following prenatal and children exposure to atomic radiation. J Radiat Res 1975;16:82–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller RW, Blot WJ. Small head size after in utero exposure to atomic radiation. Lancet 1972;2:784–787.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valentin J. Pregnancy and Radiation. Publication 84. Annals of the IRCP. 2000;30:1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Osei EK, Faulkner K. Fetal doses from radiologic examinations. Br J Rad 1999;72:773–780.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Doshi S, Negus I, Oduko J. An assessment of fetal dose due to CT pulmonary angiography for suspected maternal pulmonary embolism. Scientific Meeting of the South West PPEM Group, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kennedy EV, Iball GR, Brettle DS. Investigation into the effects of lead shielding for fetal dose reduction in CT pulmonary angiography. Br J Radiol 2007; 631–638.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fry FA. International Chernobyl Project. Radiol Protect Bull 1991;124:12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harjulehto T, Aro T, Rita H, et al. The accident at Chernobyl and the outcome of pregnancy in Finland. Br Med J 1989;298:995–997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J, Rainbow AJ, Caotes G. Risks to the fetus of radiologic procedures used in the diagnosis of maternal venous thromboembolic disease. Throm Haemost 1989;61:189–196.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stewart A, Kneale GW. Radiation doses effects in relation to obstetric X-rays and childhood cancer. Lancet 1997;1(17658):1185–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Knox EG, Stewart A, Kneale G. Prenatal irradiation and childhood cancer. J Soc Radiol Prot 1987;7:177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. NRPB Diagnostic Medical Exposures to Ionizing Radiation During Pregnancy and Estimates of Late Radiation Risks of the UK Populations. Documents of the NRPB, 1993;4(4), National Radiological Protection Board, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stewart A, Webb J, Giles D, Hewitt D. Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero. Lancet 1956; 271:447.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Biological Effects after prenatal Irradiation (Embryo and Fetus). Annals of the ICRP. Publication 90, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety. Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1335–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Webb J, Thomsen H, Morcos SK, et al. The use of iodinated and gadolimium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:12434–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Webb JA, Thomasen HS, Morcos SK; Members of Contrast Media Safety committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1234–1240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DeSantis M, Straface G, Cavaliere AF, et al. Gadolinium periconceptional exposure: pregnancy and neonatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:99–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Manual on Contrast Media Version 5.0. American College of Radiology 2004;47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  38. American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast media. Administration of contrast Medium to Nursing Mothers, 2004–2007.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety and patient care. Radiology 2004;232:635–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Food US, Drug Administration. Magnetic resonance diagnostic device: Panel recommendation and report on petitions for MR reclassification. Fed Regist 1998;53:7575–7579.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Statement, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference (Washington, D.C., October 26–28, 1987). 1987;6(14): October 26.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. Am J Roentgenol 2007;118:1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Radionuclide Exposure of the Embryo/Fetus. NCRP Report No. 128. Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 1998, September 25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, M., Larson, L. (2009). Diagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy. In: Rosene-Montella, K., Bourjeily, G. (eds) Pulmonary Problems in Pregnancy. Respiratory Medicine. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-445-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-445-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-12-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-445-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics