Skip to main content

Supporting Patients’ Participation in Decision Making

  • Chapter
  • 820 Accesses

Part of the book series: Contemporary Endocrinology ((COE))

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine integrates clinical experience with patient’s values using the best available evidence (1). In the past, physicians acted as agents in the best interest of their patients (2). These roles are now changing. Although physicians are still considered experts in diagnosing and identifying treatment options, patients are increasingly recognized as the best experts for judging values associated with options (24). With the growing patient interest in participating in decision making about options, evidence-based decision aids have been developed to supplement physician counseling. These tools prepare patients for counseling by helping them (1) understand the probable consequences of options, (2) consider and clarify the value they place on the consequences, and (3) actively participating their physician when selecting the best option of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM, 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gafni A, Charles C, Whelan T. The physician-patient encounter: the physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:347–354.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Connor AM, Drake ER, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Laupacis A, Elmslie T. A survey of the decisionmaking needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions. Health Expectations 2003;6:97–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin S. “Shared responsibility” becoming the new medical buzz phrase. CMAJ 2002;167:295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chalmers, Clinical Evidence Volume 2, BMJ Publications, 1999. Available at http://www.clinicalevidence.com/ceweb/about/guide;sp accessed Aug 23, 2005.

  6. Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the US preventive services Task Force: a review of the process. Am Prevent Med 2001;20:21–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutter D, Quine L. Social cognition models and changing health behaviours. In: Rutter D, Quine L, eds. Changing Health Behaviour. Intervention and Research with Social Cognition Models. 1st ed. Open University Press, Buckingham, 2002, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, ValRoyen P, Denekens J. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther 2001;26:331–342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Orbell S, Sheeran P. Changing health behaviours: The role of implementation intentions. In: Rutter D, Quine L, eds. Changing Health Behaviour. Intervention and Research with Social Cognition Models. 1st ed. Open University Press, Buckingham, 2002, pp. 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1087–1110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient centred care. BMJ 2001;322:444–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weston WW, Brown JB, Stewart MA. Patient-centred interviewing Part I: Understanding patients’ experiences. Can Fam Physician 1989;35:147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown JB, Weston WW, Stewart MA. Patient-centred interviewing Part II: Finding common ground. Can Fam Physician 1989;35:153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lester G, Smith S. Listening and talking to patients. A remedy for malpractice suits? West J Med 1993;158:268–272.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions [Cochrane Review]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Update Software, Oxford, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connor A. Using patient decision aids to promote evidence-based decision making. Am Coll Phys Evidence-Based Med 2001;6:101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Graham ID, Logan J, O’Connor A, Weeks K. A qualitative study of physicians’ perceptions of three decision aids. Patient Educ Counseling 2003;50:279–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman AC, Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 2001;323:1100–1104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Deyo RA. A key medical decision maker: the patient. BMJ 2001;323:466–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D. An evidence-based approach to managing women’s decisional conflict. JOGNN 2003;31:570–581.

    Google Scholar 

  21. O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decision Making 1995;15(1):25–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells G, et al. Randomized trial of a portable, self-administered decision aid for post-menopausal women considering long-term preventive hormone therapy. Med Decis Making 1998;18:295–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cranney A, Jacobsen MJ, O’Connor AM, Tugwell P, Adachi JD. A decision aid presenting multiple therapeutic options for women with osteoporosis: Development and evaluation. Med Decis Making 2001;21:547.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grant FC, Laupacis A, O’Connor AM, Rubens F, Robblee J. Evaluation of a decision aid for autologous predonation for patients before open-heart surgery. CMAJ 2001;164:1139–1144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Comeau, C. Evaluation of a decision aid for family members considering long-term care options for their relative with dementia. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell SL, Tetroe J, O’Connor AM. A decision aid for long-term tube feeding in cognitively impaired older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cranney A, Simon LS, Tugwell P, Adachi R, Guyatt G. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. In: Tugwell P, Shea B, Boers M, et al. eds. Evidence-based Rheumatology. BMJ Books, 2004:183–243.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brown JP, Josse RG. 2002 Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 2002;167:S1–S34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Connor, A.M., Stacey, D., Légaré, F. (2006). Supporting Patients’ Participation in Decision Making. In: Montori, V.M. (eds) Evidence-Based Endocrinology. Contemporary Endocrinology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-008-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-008-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-579-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-008-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics