Skip to main content

Assessment of Marine Mammal Impact Zones for Use of Military Sonar in the Baltic Sea

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 875))

Abstract

Military sonars are known to have caused cetaceans to strand. Navies in shallow seas use different frequencies and sonar pulses, commonly frequencies between 25 and 100 kHz, compared with most studied NATO sonar systems that have been evaluated for their environmental impact. These frequencies match the frequencies of best hearing in the harbor porpoises and seals resident in the Baltic Sea. This study uses published temporary and permanent threshold shifts, measured behavioral response thresholds, technical specifications of a sonar system, and environmental parameters affecting sound propagation common for the Baltic Sea to estimate the impact zones for harbor porpoises and seals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dolman SJ, Weir CR, Jasny M (2009) Comparative review of marine mammal guidance implemented during naval exercises. Mar Pollut Bull 59:465–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finneran JJ, Jenkins AK (2012) Criteria and thresholds for U.S. Navy acoustic and explosive effects analysis. Marine Mammal Program, Space and Naval Warfare Systems (SPAWAR) Center, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz T, Janik VM (2010) Aversiveness of sounds in phocid seals: psycho-physiological factors, learning processes and motivation. J Exp Biol 213:1536–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand JA (2004) Impacts of anthropogenic sound on cetaceans. Unpublished paper submitted to the International Whaling Commission Scientific Committee, IWC/SC/56/E13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastak D, Southall BL, Schusterman RJ, Kastak CR (2005) Underwater temporary threshold shift in pinnipeds: effects of noise level and duration. J Acoust Soc Am 118:3154–3163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein RA, Wensveen PJ, Hoek L, Verboom WC, Terhune JM (2009) Underwater detection of tonal signals between 0.125 and 100 kHz by harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). J Acoust Soc Am 125:1222–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein RA, Hoek L, de Jong CAF, Wensveen PJ (2010) The effect of signal duration on the underwater detection thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for single frequency-modulated tonal signals between 0.25 and 60 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am 128:3211–3222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein RA, van den Belt I, Hoek L, Gransier R, Johansson T (2015a) Behavioral responses of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) to 25 kHz FM sonar signals. Aquat Mam 41(3): 311–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein RA, Hoek L, Janssens G, Gransier R, Johansson T (2015b) Behavioral responses of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) to sonar signals in the 25 kHz range. Aquat Mam (in press, Special issue related to ESOMM; Fall 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucke K, Siebert U, Lepper PA, Blanchet MA (2009) Temporary shift in masked hearing thresholds in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) after exposure to seismic airgun stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 125:4060–4070

    Google Scholar 

  • OSPAR (2009) Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment. Paper presented at the OSPAR Commission, Biodiversity Series Publication No 441/2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JJ, Gentry RL, Greene CR Jr, Kastak D, Ketten DR, Miller JH, Nachtigall PE, Richardson WJ, Thomas JA, Tyack PL (2007) Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquat Mamm 33:411–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson WJ (1995) Zones of noise influence. In: Richardson WJ, Greene CR, Malme CI, Thomson DH (eds) Marine mammals and noise. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 325–386

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway SH, Joyce PL (1975) Studies on seal brains by radiotelemetry. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 169:81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhune JM, Ronald K (1975) Underwater hearing sensitivity of two ringed seals (Pusa hispida). Can J Zool 53:227–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support of the Swedish Defence Material Administration and the helpful comments of several anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias H. Andersson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andersson, M.H., Johansson, T. (2016). Assessment of Marine Mammal Impact Zones for Use of Military Sonar in the Baltic Sea. In: Popper, A., Hawkins, A. (eds) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 875. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics