Abstract
This chapter explores the contours of police integrity in the United States. The 11 local police departments, surveyed across the United States in the period from 2013 to 2014, constitute a convenience sample of a diverse range of police departments, with both large and small municipal agencies and sheriff’s departments. The questionnaire is built around 11 scenarios covering a variety of forms of police misconduct, including police corruption, use of excessive force, planting of evidence, and failure to execute an arrest warrant. After reviewing each scenario, the respondents were asked to report own and others’ evaluation of its seriousness, appropriate and expected discipline, as well as own and others’ willingness to report the misconduct. The respondents evaluated scenarios described in the questionnaire to range in seriousness from the least serious (acceptance of gratuities and verbal abuse of citizens) to the most serious (opportunistic theft, unjustifiable use of deadly force, and official report falsification). Although most of the respondents expected and supported some discipline for all the scenarios described in the questionnaire, they expected police officers to be dismissed from service only for the three most serious scenarios. We also measured the contours of the code of silence and found that the code of silence is far from the flat prohibition of reporting. The code was much stronger for the behaviors evaluated as the least serious and the weakest for the behaviors evaluated as the most serious.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
Klockars and colleagues (2004, p. 26) “employed a rule of thumb which was to regard mean differences of less than 0.5 as not meaningful even though a simple t-test establishes the difference as significant.” With more than 650 completed questionnaires, nearly every mean response in this study differed from the mean responses to other questions by a statistically significant margin (p < 0.001).
- 3.
The two questions were worded: “If an officer in your agency engaged in this behavior and was discovered doing so, what if any, discipline do you think SHOULD follow?” and “If an officer in your agency engaged in this behavior and was discovered doing so, what if any, discipline do you think WOULD follow?”
- 4.
The answers were reclassified the following way: “none” remained “none,” “dismissal” remained “dismissal,” and all the other disciplinary options (“verbal reprimand,” “written reprimand,” “suspension,” “demotion in rank”) were reclassified as “some discipline other than dismissal”.
- 5.
The question was worded: “Do you think you would report a fellow police officer who engaged in this behavior?”
References
Adams, K. (1999). What we know about police use of force. Use of force by police: Overview of national and local data. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
Alpert, G. P. (1997). Pursuit policies and training. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Barker, T. (2002). Ethnical police behavior. In K. Lersch (Ed.), Police misconduct. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Barker, T., & Wells, R. O. (1982). Police administrator’s attitudes toward definition and control of police deviance. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 51, 8–16.
Baueris, V. (1997). New York Police Department: Preventing crime and corruption. http://www.icac.nsw.gov.au/frame_pub.htm10 Jan 2014.
Black, D., & Reiss, A. J. (1967). Patterns of behavior in citizen and police transactions. In Studies of crime and law enforcement in major metropolitan areas, field surveys III, Vol. 2. President’s commission on law enforcement and the administration of justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Bopp, W. J., & Schultz, D. O. (1972). A short history of American law enforcement. Springfield: Thomas.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2011). Census of state and local law enforcement agencies, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/csllea08.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Canon, B. C. (1974). Is the exclusionary rule in failing health? Some new data and a plea against a precipitous conclusion. Kentucky Law Journal, 62, 681–730.
Canon, B. C. (1991). Courts and policy: Compliance, implementation, and impact. In J. B. Gates & C. A. Johnson (Eds.), American courts: A critical assessment. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Carter, D. L. (1994). Police disciplinary procedures: A review of selected police departments. In T. Barker & D. L. Carter (Eds.), Police deviance (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson.
CATO Institute (2010). National police misconduct reporting project. http://www.policemisconduct.net/2010-q2-npmsrp-national-police-misconduct-statistical-report/. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Chaiken, J. M., Greenwood, P. W., & Petersilia, J. (1976). The criminal investigation process: A summary report. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2006/P5628-1.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Cheh, M. M. (1995). Are law suits an answer to police brutality? In W. A. Geller & H. Toch (Eds.), And justice for all. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
Chin, G. (1997). New York City police corruption investigation commissions, 1894–1994. Buffalo: William S. Hein & Co.
[Christopher Commission]. Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department. 1991. Report of the independent commission on the Los Angeles Police Department. Los Angeles: Author.
Costello, A. E. (1972). Our police protectors: A history of New York police. Montclair: Patterson Smith.
Curran, C. (1913). Report of the special committee of the board of aldermen of the city of New York appointed August 5, 1912 to Investigate the police department. New York: Author.
Fishman, J. E. (1978). Measuring police corruption. New York: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
Fyfe, J. J. (1979). Administrative interventions on police shooting discretion: An empirical examination. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7, 303–323.
Geller, W. A., & Scott, M. S. (1992). Deadly force: What we know: A practitioner’s desk reference on police-involved shootings. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
Giuliani, R. W., & Bratton, W. J. (1995). Police Strategy No. 7: Rooting out corruption. Building organizational integrity in the New York Police Department. New York: New York Police Department.
Hagedorn, J., Kmiecik, B., Simpson, D., Gradel, T. J., Zmuda, M. M., & Sterrett, D. (2013). Crime, corruption and cover-ups in the Chicago Police Department. Anti-Corruption Report Number 7. University of Illinois Chicago Department of Political Science. http://www.uic.edu/depts/pols/ChicagoPolitics/policecorruption.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Helfand, J. (1955). Report of special investigation by the district attorney of kings county, and the December 1949 grand jury. New York: Author.
Hickman, M. J. (2006). Citizen complaints about police use of force. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/ccpuf.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Human Rights Watch (1998). Shielded from justice: Police brutality and accountability in the United States. New York: Human Rights Watch.
Hunter, R. D., Mayhall, P. D., & Barker, T. (2000). Police-community relations and the administration of justice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Kappeler, L., & Gaines, V. E. (2011). Policing in America (7th ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson.
Kelling, G. L., & Moore, M. H. (1988). The evolving strategy of policing. https://ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/114213.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015
Kelling, G. L., Pate, T., Dieckman, D., & Brown, C. E. (1974). The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment. http://www.policefoundation.org/sites/g/files/g798246/f/Kelling%20et%20al.%20%281974%29%20%20THE%20KANSAS%20CITY%20PREVENTIVE%20PATROL%20EXPERIMENT.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Kerner Commission [National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders]. (1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on civil disorders. Washington, DC: Govt. Printing Office.
Ketcham, G. A. (1967). Municipal police reform, a comparative study of law enforcement in Cincinnati, Chicago, New Orleans, New York and St. Louis, 1844–1877. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri.
Klockars, C. B., & Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2004). Measuring police integrity. In M. J. Hickman, A. R. Piquero, & J. R. Greene (Eds.), Police integrity and ethics. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., Harver, W. E., & Haberfeld, M. R. (1997). The measurement of police integrity. Final Report Submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., Harver, W. E., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2000). The measurement of police integrity. Research in brief. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (Eds.). (2004a). Police integrity in the United States of America. In C. B. Klockars, S. Kutnjak Ivković, & M. R. Haberfeld (Eds.), The contours of police integrity. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (Eds.). (2004b). The contours of police integrity. In C. B. Klockars, S. Kutnjak Ivković, & M. R. Haberfeld (Eds.)., The contours of police integrity (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2006). Enhancing police integrity. New York: Springer.
[Knapp Commission]. Commission to Investigate Allegations of Police Corruption and the City’s Anti-Corruption Procedures. (1972). Report on police corruption. New York: G. Braziller.
Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2005). Fallen blue knights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2014). Police misconduct. In M. Reisig & R. Kane (Eds.), Handbook on police and policing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M., & Peacock, R. (2013). Rainless west: The integrity survey’s role in agency accountability. Police Quarterly, 16(2), 148–176.
Lane, R. (1967). Policing the city: Boston 1822–1885. Cambridge: Harvard Univesity Press.
LEMAS (2007). Local police departments. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/lpd07.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Leo, R. A. (1998). The impact of Miranda revisited. In R. A. Leo & G. C. Thomas (Eds.), The Miranda debate: Law, justice, and policing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Leo, R. A., & Thomas, G. C. (1998). The Miranda debate: Law, justice, and policing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Lexow, C. (1895). Report of the special committee appointed to investigate the police department of the city of New York. Albany: Author.
Lindberg, R. C. (2008). To protect and to serve: Chicago politics and police corruption from the lager beer riot to the summerdale scandal, 1855–1960. New York: Praeger.
Manfreda, L. K., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79–104.
[Mollen Commission] New York City Commission to Investigate Allegations of Police Corruption and the Anti-Corruption Procedures of the Police Department. (1994). Commission report. New York: Author.
Moore, M. H., & Kelling, G. L. (1985). To serve and protect: Learning from police history. In A. S. Blumberg & E. Niederhoffer. The ambivalent force. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Morn, F. T. (1977). Allan Pinkerton, private police influence on police development. Montclair: Patterson Smith.
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. (1973). Reports of the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. Washington, DC: Govt. Printing Office.
National Advisory Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. (1969). To establish justice, to insure domestic tranquility. Washington, DC: Govt. Printing Office.
National Institute of Justice (NIJ). (2009). The Use-of-Force Continuum. http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/officer-safety/use-of-force/Pages/continuum.aspx. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.
National Research Council. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. Wesley Skogan and Kathleen Frydl, editors. Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Oaks, D. H. (1970). Studying the exclusionary rule in search and seizure. University of Chicago School Law Review, 37, 655–757.
Oliver, W. M. (1998). Community-oriented policing: A systemic approach to policing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Orfield, M. W. Jr (1987). The exclusionary rule and deterrence: An empirical study of chicago narcotics officers. University of Chicago Law School Review, 54, 1016–1069.
Pate, A., & Fridell, L. (1993). Police use of force: Official reports, citizen complaints, and legal consequences. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
Pate, A., & Hamilton, E. E. (1991). The big six: Policing America’s largest cities. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
Pennsylvania Crime Commission. (1974). Report on police corruption and the quality of law enforcement in Philadelphia. Saint Davids: Author.
Perez, D. W. (1994). Common sense about police review. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
President’s Commission on Campus Unrest. (1970). Report of the president’s commission on campus unrest. Washington, DC: Govt. Printing Office.
President’s Crime Commission [President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice] (1967). The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/42.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Reaves, B. A. (2010). Local Police Departments. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/lpd07.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Reaves, B. A., & Hickman, M. J. (2004). Law enforcement managementand administrative statistics, 2000: Data for individual state and local agencies with 100 or more officers. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/lemas00.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Roberg, R. R., Crank, J. P., & Kuykendall, J. (2000). Police & society. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
Roebuck, J. B., & Barker, T. (1974). A typology of police corruption. Social Problems, 21(3), 423–437.
Seabury, S. (1932). Final report of samuel seabury, referee, in the matter of the investigation of the magistrates’ courts in the first judicial department and the magistrates thereof, and of attorneys-at-law practicing in said courts. New York: Author.
Shih, T., & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20, 249–271.
Skolnick, J. (1966). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in a democratic society. New York: Wiley.
Spelman, W., & Brown, D. K. (1981). Calling the police: Citizen reporting of serious crime. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1981). Who is guarding the guardians? Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Justice (2001). Principles for promoting police integrity. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojp/186189.pdf.Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Vera Institute of Justice. (2002). Pittsburgh’s experience with police monitoring. http://www.vera.org/project/project1_1asp?section_id=2&proejct_id=13. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Walker, S. (1977). A critical history of police reform. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Walker, S. (1999). The police in America: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Walker, S., & Katz, C. M. (2008). The police in America: An introduction (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Walker, S., & Katz, C. (2013). The police in America: An introduction (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Walker, S., Alpert, G., & Kenney, D. (2000). Responding to the problem officer: A national evaluation of early warning systems. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Weisburd, D., Greenspan, R., Hamilton, E. E., Williams, H., & Bryant, K. A. (2000). Police attitudes toward abuse of authority: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Research in Brief. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181312.pdf.Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Westley, W. (1970). The police. Boston: MIT Press.
Williams, H., & Murphy, P. V. (1990). The evolving strategy of police: A minority view. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/121019.pdf.Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M., Peacock, R. (2015). Police Integrity in the United States. In: Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M. (eds) Measuring Police Integrity Across the World. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2279-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2279-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2278-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2279-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)