Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biomass Feedstock Storage for Quantity and Quality Preservation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Engineering and Science of Biomass Feedstock Production and Provision

Abstract

Biomass feedstock must be stored between the time of harvest and its conversion to bioenergy products such as ethanol to ensure year-round, continuous supply of quality feedstock to conversion plants. Storage of biomass entails conserving both its dry matter content and its carbohydrate content which may be converted to ethanol. Moreover, it also entails preparing the biomass in terms of its composition, particle size, and pH for the pretreatment stage where cellulose is hydrolyzed into C6 sugars and later fermented into alcohol. The goal of this chapter is to provide an overview of these aspects related to biomass feedstock storage. Various storage options, ranging from open storage without any protection to highly sophisticated controlled environment, are first reviewed to highlight their advantages and limitations. The feedstock properties important from a storage perspective are then discussed. Potential alternatives to reduce dry matter losses during storage are discussed. Mathematical relationships correlating dry matter loss with its various causes are reported. These include drying, compaction, sealing, and freezing. The factors affecting the reduction in biomass recalcitrance are then presented, and their impact on quality parameters relevant to processing is discussed. The reduction of dry matter recalcitrance to prepare biomass for further processing is discussed with the options of incorporating those in storage facilities. Guidelines to select a storage method that may be used by design engineers or managers are also presented. The review showed that the importance of storage in the value chain is being realized, leading to greater interest on developing alternatives to improve storage efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shastri YN, Hansen AC, Rodriguez LF, Ting KC (2010) Optimization of Miscanthus harvesting and handling as an energy crop: BioFeed model application. Biol Eng Trans 3(1):37–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Emery IR, Mosier NS (2012) The impact of dry matter loss during herbaceous biomass storage on net greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels production. Biomass Bioenergy 39:237–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chico-Santamarta L, Humphries AC, Chaney K, White DR, Magan N, Godwin RJ (2011) Microbial changes during the on-farm storage of canola (oilseed rape) straw bales and pellets. Biomass Bioenergy 35(7):2939–2949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenhalf CE, Nowakowski DJ, Yates N, Shield I, Bridgwater AV (2013) The influence of harvest and storage on the properties of and fast pyrolysis products from Miscanthus × giganteus. Biomass Bioenergy 56:247–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brand MA, Bolzon de Muñiz GI, Quirino WF, Brito JO (2011) Storage as a tool to improve wood fuel quality. Biomass Bioenergy 35(7):2581–2588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li Y, Shi J, Reeder R (eds) (2011) Storing lignocellulosic biomass for bio-refining industry. The Ohio State University Extension, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rigdon AR, Jumpponen A, Vadlani PV, Maier DE (2013) Impact of various storage conditions on enzymatic activity, biomass components and conversion to ethanol yields from sorghum biomass used as a bioenergy crop. Bioresour Technol 132:269–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin T, Rodriguez LF, Shastri YN, Hansen AC, Ting KC (2013) GIS-enabled biomass-ethanol supply chain optimization: model development and Miscanthus application. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 7(3):314–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thiex NJ, Tv E (2002) Determination of water (moisture) and dry matter in animal feed, grain, and forage (plant tissue) by Karl Fischer titration: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 85(2):318–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaack K, Schwarz K (2001) Morphological and mechanical properties of Miscanthus in relation to harvesting, lodging, and growth conditions. Ind Crop Prod 14(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Womac AR, Yu M, Igathinathine C et al (2005) Shearing characteristics of biomass for size reduction. ASABE annual international meeting; paper number 056058, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chaoui H, Hu M, Eckhoff SR, Ting KC (2009) Designing a biomass storage system: part of a biomass production system. ASABE annual meeting 2009, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garleb KA, Fahey JGC, Lewis SM, Kerley MS, Montgomery L (1988) Chemical composition and digestibility of fiber fractions of certain by-product feedstuffs to ruminants. J Anim Sci 66(2650):2662

    Google Scholar 

  14. McNeil M, Albersheim P, Taiz L, Jones RL (1975) The structure of plant cell walls: VII. Barley aleurone cells. Plant Physiol 55:64–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chesson A (1982) A holistic approach to plant cell wall structure and degradation. In: Wallace G, Bell L (eds) Fibre in human and animal nutrition. Royal Society of New Zealand Bull. No. 20. Massey University, Palmerston North, NZ, pp 85–90

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gomez LD, Steele-King CG, McQueen-Mason SJ (2008) Tansley review: sustainable liquid biofuels from biomass: the writing’s on the walls. New Phytol 178(3):473–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiselogel AE, Agblevor FA, Johnson DK, Deutch S, Fennell JA, Sanderson MA (1996) Compositional changes during storage of large round switchgrass bales. Bioresour Technol 56(1):103–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Duffy M (ed) (2007) Estimated costs for production, storage and transportation of switchgrass. Iowa State University—University Extension, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiselogel AE, Agblevor FA, Johnson DK, Deutch S, Fennell JA, Sanderson MA (1994) Composition changes during storage of large round switchgrass bales. In: ASAE alternate energy conference

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mani S, Patterson J, Bi X (2006) Modeling of the wet storage of biomass. ASABE annual international meeting; paper number: 061014, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

  21. McDonald P (1981) The biochemistry of silage. Wiley, Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pitt RE, Muck RE, Leibensperger RY (1985) A quantitative model of the ensilage process in lactate silages. Grass Forage Sci 40(3):279–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McGechan MB, Williams AG (1994) A model of air infiltration losses during silage storage. J Agric Eng Res 57(4):237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huisman W (ed) (2005) Optimizing harvesting and storage systems for energy crops in The Netherlands. Wageningen University Netherlands Department of Agrotechnology and Food Science Farm Technology Group, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  25. Arabhosseini A, Huisman W, Müller J (2010) Modeling of the equilibrium moisture content (EMC) of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus). Biomass Bioenergy 34(4):411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. He X, Lau AK, Sokhansanj S, Lim CJ, Bi XT, Melin S et al (2013) Moisture sorption isotherms and drying characteristics of aspen (Populus tremuloides). Biomass Bioenergy 57:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fitzpatrick JJ, O’Sullivan C, Boylan H, Cribben O, Costello D, Cronin K (2013) Moisture sorption isotherm study of Sitka spruce, larch, willow and miscanthus chips and stems. Biosyst Eng 115(4):474–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanjore D, Richard TL, Marshall MN (2012) Experimental methods for laboratory-scale ensilage of lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 47:125–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McDonald P, Wittenbury R (1973) The ensilage process. In: Butler GW, Bailey RW (eds) The chemistry and biochemistry of herbage. Academic, London, pp 33–60

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huisman W (2003) Optimising harvesting and storage systems for energy crops in The Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the international conference on crop harvesting and processing

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ruppel KL (1992) Effect of bunker silo management on hay crop nutrient management

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sanderson M, Egg R, Wiselogel A (1997) Biomass losses during harvest and storage of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 12:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eckhoff SR (2010) Freezing instead of drying high-moisture corn. Resource 17(6):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  34. Christakopoulos P, Macris B, Kekos D (1990) On the mechanism of direct conversion of cellulose to ethanol by Fusarium oxysporum: effect of cellulase and β-glucosidase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33(1):18–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kenney KL, Smith WA, Gresham GL, Westover TL (2013) Understanding biomass feedstock variability. Biofuels 4(1):111–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kurasawa S, Hayashi J, Sugahara T (1982) Proximate and dietary fibre analysis of mushrooms. J Jpn Soc Food Sci Technol 29(7):400–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shinners KJ, Binversie BN, Muck RE, Weimer PJ (2007) Comparison of wet and dry corn stover harvest and storage. Biomass Bioenergy 31(4):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (1996) Factors affecting cellulose hydrolysis and the potential of enzyme recycle to enhance the efficiency of an integrated wood to ethanol process. Biotechnol Bioeng 51(4):375–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hatakka A (1994) Lignin-modifying enzymes from selected white-rot fungi: production and role from in lignin degradation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 13(2–3):125–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Khanal SK, Montalbo M, van Leeuwen JH, Srinivasan G, Grewell D (2007) Ultrasound enhanced glucose release from corn in ethanol plants. Biotechnol Bioeng 98(5):978–985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chaves AV, Waghorn GC, Brookes IM, Woodfield DR (2006) Effect of maturation and initial harvest dates on the nutritive characteristics of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L). Anim Feed Sci Technol 127(3–4):293–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jung HG, Mertens DR, Payne AJ (1997) Correlation of acid detergent lignin and klason lignin with digestibility of forage dry matter and neutral detergent fiber. J Dairy Sci 80(8): 1622–1628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cherney DJR, Cherney JH, Lucey RF (1993) In vitro digestion kinetics and quality of perennial grasses as influenced by forage maturity. J Dairy Sci 76(3):790–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rentizelas AA, Tolis AJ, Tatsiopoulos IP (2009) Logistics issues of biomass: the storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(4):887–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Cundiff J, Marsh L (1996) Harvest and storage costs for bales of switchgrass in the southeastern United States. Bioresour Technol 56(1):95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mooney DF, Larson JA, English BC, Tyler DD (2012) Effect of dry matter loss on profitability of outdoor storage of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 44:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ren H, Richard TL, Chen Z, Kuo M, Bian Y, Moore KJ et al (2006) Ensiling corn stover: effect of feedstock preservation on particleboard performance. Biotechnol Prog 22(1):78–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shastri YN, Hansen AC, Rodriguez LF, Ting KC (2011) Development and application of BioFeed model for optimization of herbaceous biomass feedstock production. Biomass Bioenergy 35(7):2961–2974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Iqbal T, Eckhoff SR, Danao MC, Ting KC (2011) Aeration of baled and chopped miscanthus in a covered test facility. ASABE annual international meeting, paper number 1111066, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bedane AH, Afzal MT, Sokhansanj S (2011) Simulation of temperature and moisture changes during storage of woody biomass owing to weather variability. Biomass Bioenergy 35(7): 3147–3151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Anders Eriksson (2011) Energy efficient storage of biomass at Vattenfall heat and power plants. M.S.Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  52. Williams DA, Danao MC, Paulsen MR, Rausch KD, Ibanez AB, Bauer S (2013) Partial least squares—discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of Miscanthus × giganteus by FT-NIR spectroscopy. ASABE annual international meeting, paper number 131596145, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Product Developer, Toronto, ON, M6R 1V9, Canada

    Hala Chaoui Pd.D.

  2. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois, 1304 W. Pennsylvania Avenue, Room 338 AESB, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Steven R. Eckhoff B.A., M.S.E., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Hala Chaoui Pd.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven R. Eckhoff B.A., M.S.E., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hala Chaoui Pd.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Yogendra Shastri

  2. Dept. of Ag and Bio Engineering Agricultural Engineering Sciences Bldg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA

    Alan Hansen

  3. Dept of Ag and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA

    Luis Rodríguez

  4. Dept of Ag and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA

    K.C. Ting

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaoui, H., Eckhoff, S.R. (2014). Biomass Feedstock Storage for Quantity and Quality Preservation. In: Shastri, Y., Hansen, A., Rodríguez, L., Ting, K. (eds) Engineering and Science of Biomass Feedstock Production and Provision. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8014-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation