Abstract
This paper focuses on the role of the computer in helping to manage mathe-matically unsolvable sets of equations that arise within models in the physical sciences. The study of these models often consists in developing representations of the underlying physics on a computer, and using the techniques of computer simulation in order to learn about the behavior of these systems. I argue that this process of transformation, which involves a hierarchy of models, is also a process of knowledge creation, and it has its own epistemology. Accordingly, I urge philosophers of science to examine more carefully the process of theory articulation, the process by which a general theory is made to conform to a particular application. It is a relatively neglected aspect of scientific practice, but it plays a role that is often as crucial, as complex, and as creative as theorizing and experimenting. Indeed, my conclusion will be that we now need a new philosophy of simulation to complement recent work on the philosophy of experiment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cartwright, N., 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Essays 7 and 8, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hacking, I., 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kaufmann, W.J., and Smarr, L.L., 1993, Supercomputing and the Transformation of Science, Scientific American Library, New York.
Kuhn, T., 1977, The function of measurement in modern physical science, in: The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Moin, P., and Kim, J., 1997, Tackling turbulence with supercomputers, Scientific American 276, 1:62–68.
Ramsey, J.L., 1992, An expanded epistemology of approximations, in: PSA 1992, vol. 1, D. Hull, M. Forbes, and K. Okruhlik, eds., Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 154–66.
Shirayama, S., and Kuwahara, K., 1990, Flow visualization in computational fluid dynamics, The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications 4/2:66–80.
Smarr, L., 1985, An approach to complexity, Science 228:403–408.
Suppes, P., 1962, Models of data, in: Logic,Methodology and Philosophy of Science, E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Wilhelmson, R.B., et. al., 1990, A study of the evolution of a numerically modeled severe storm, The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications 4/2:20–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winsberg, E. (1999). The Hierarchy of Models in Simulation. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J., Thagard, P. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7181-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4813-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive