Abstract
This paper addresses how specific modeling practices employed by scientists are productive methods of conceptual change in science. Within philosophy, where the identification of reasoning with argument and logic is deeply ingrained, these practices have not traditionally been considered significant forms of scientific reasoning. Embracing these modeling practices as “methods” of conceptual change in science requires expanding philosophical notions of scientific reasoning to encompass forms of creative reasoning. I focus on three forms of model-based reasoning demonstrated in my previous work as generative of conceptual change in science: analogical modeling, visual modeling, and thought experimenting. The models are intended as interpretations of target physical systems, processes, phenomena, or situations. The models are retrieved or constructed on the basis of potentially satisfying salient constraints of the target domain. In the modeling process, various forms of abstraction, such as limiting case, idealization, generalization, generic modeling, are utilized. Evaluation and adaptation take place in light of structural, causal, and/or functional constraint satisfaction. Simulation can be used to produce new states and enable evaluation of behaviors, constraint satisfaction, and other factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cartwright, N., 1989, Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement, Clarendon, Oxford.
Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., and Glaser, R., 1981, Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices, Cognitive Science 5:121–52.
Campbell, N.R., 1920, Physics, the Elements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Clement, J., 1989, Learning via model construction and criticism, in: Handbook of Creativity: Assessment, Theory,and Research, G. Glover, R. Ronning, and C. Reynolds, eds., Ple-num, New York, pp. 341–81.
Craik, K., 1943, The Nature of Explanation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
de Kleer, J., and Brown, J.S., 1983, Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models, in: D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, pp. 155–190.
Duhem, P., 1902, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Atheneum, New York (reprinted 1962).
Faraday, M., 1839–1855, Experimental Researches in Electricity, Dover, New York (reprinted 1965).
Gentner, D., and Gentner, D.R., 1983, Flowing waters or teaming crowds: mental models of electricity, in: D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, pp. 99–130.
Gentner, D., and Stevens, A.L., 1983, Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Gilhooly, K.J., 1986, Mental modeling: A framework for the study of thinking, in: Thinking: Progress in Research and Teaching, J. Bishop, J. Lochhead, and D. Perkins, eds., Law-rence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 19–32.
Giere, R.N., 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Giere, R.N., 1994, The cognitive structure of scientific theories, Philosophy of Science 61:276–296.
Gooding, D.C., 1990, Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Griffith, T., Nersessian, N., and Goel, A., 1996, The role of generic models in conceptual change, in: Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 18, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 312–317.
Hempel, C.G., 1952, Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hesse, M., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
Ippolito, M.F., and Tweney, R.D., 1995, The inception of insight, in: The Nature of Insight, R.J. Sternberg and J.E. Davidson, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Johnson-Laird, P.N., 1983, Mental Models, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kosslyn, S.M., 1994, Image and Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kuhn, T.S., 1964, A function for thought experiments, in: The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 240–265
Kuhn, T.S., 1991, The road since structure, in: PSA 1990, A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, eds., Vol. 2, PSA, East Lansing, MI, pp. 3–16.
Maxwell, J.C., 1890, The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, W.D. Niven, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nersessian, N.J., 1984, Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
Nersessian, N.J., 1988, Reasoning from imagery and analogy in scientific concept formation, in: PSA 1988, A. Fine and J. Leplin, eds., Vol. 1, PSA, East Lansing, MI, pp. 41–48.
Nersessian, N.J., 1992, How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science, in: Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15,R. Giere, ed., University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 3–44.
Nersessian, N.J., 1993, In the theoretician’s laboratory: thought experimenting as mental modeling, in: PSA 1992, D. Hull, M. Forbes, and K. Okruhlik, eds., Vol. 2, PSA, East Lansing, MI, pp. 291–301.
Nersessian, N.J., 1995, Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics, Science & Education 4:203–226.
Nersessian, N.J., 1999, Abstraction via generic modeling in concept formation in science, in: Correcting the Model: Idealization and Abstraction in Science, N. Cartwright and M.R. Jones, eds., Editions Rodopi, Amsterdam, in press.
Norton, J. 1991, Thought experiments in Einstein’s work, in: Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, T. Horowitz and G. Massey, eds., Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, MD, pp. 129–148
Perrig, W., and Kintsch, W., 1985, Propositional and situational representations of text, Journal of Memory and Language 24:503–518.
Shelley, C., 1996, Visual abductive reasoning in archaeology, Philosophy of Science 63:278–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nersessian, N.J. (1999). Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J., Thagard, P. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7181-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4813-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive