Skip to main content

Approach to Arteriovenous Access

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1359 Accesses

Abstract

A reliable vascular access is crucial in providing life-sustaining dialysis therapies in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). An access that is easy to create, readily available for usage, and relatively maintenance-free with a low infection risk is considered an “ideal” vascular access. Although none of the currently available vascular accesses possess all the characteristics, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) comes the closest and is often referred to as “lifeline” for dialysis patients. This chapter will focus on a brief discussion of the types of available vascular accesses for dialysis, pre-dialysis access evaluation, physical examination of arteriovenous access (both arteriovenous fistulae, AVF, and arteriovenous grafts, AVG), detection of recirculation and stenosis, and strategies to achieve appropriate AV access including secondary AVF (SAVF) placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Roy-Chaudhury P, Kelly BS, Melhem M, et al. Vascular access in hemodialysis: issues, management, and emerging concepts. Cardiol Clin. 2005;23(3):249–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah R, Bhatt UY, Cleef SV, et al. Vascular access thrombosis and interventions in patients missing hemodialysis sessions. Clin Nephrol. 2011;76(6):435–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vachharajani TJ, Salman L, Yevzlin AS, et al. Successful models of interventional nephrology at academic medical centers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(11):2130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Asif A, Besarab A, Roy-Chaudhury P, Spergel LM, Ravani P. Interventional nephrology: from episodic to coordinated vascular access care. J Nephrol. 2007;20(4):399–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Asif A, Byers P, Gadalean F, Roth D. Peritoneal dialysis underutilization: the impact of an interventional nephrology peritoneal dialysis access program. Semin Dial. 2003;16(3):266–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beathard GA. The treatment of vascular access graft dysfunction: a nephrologist’s view and experience. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1994;1(2):131–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beathard GA. Percutaneous venous angioplasty in the treatment of stenotic lesions affecting dialysis fistulas. ASAIO Trans. 1991;37(3):M224–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology. Guidelines for training, certification, and accreditation in placement of permanent tunneled and cuffed peritoneal dialysis catheters. Semin Dial. 2003;15(6):440–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology. Guidelines for training, certification, and accreditation for hemodialysis vascular access and endovascular procedures. Semin Dial. 2003;16(2):173–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, Hurwich BJ. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med. 1966;275(20):1089–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller PE, Tolwani A, Luscy CP, et al. Predictors of adequacy of arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1999;57(1):275–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammes M. Hemodialysis access: the fistula. Technical problems in patients on hemodialysis.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodriguez JA, Armadans L, Ferrer E, et al. The function of permanent vascular access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15(3):402–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jindal K, Chan CT, Deziel C, et al. Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17 Suppl 1:S1–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48 Suppl 1:S1–322.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gradman WS, Laub J, Cohen W. Femoral vein transposition for arteriovenous hemodialysis access: improved patient selection and intraoperative measures reduce postoperative ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(2):279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beathard GA. Physical examination of the dialysis vascular access. Semin Dial. 1998;11(4):231–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beathard GA. Physical examination: the forgotten tool. In: Gray R, Sands J, editors. A multidisciplinary approach for hemodialysis access. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 111–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schwab SJ, Oliver MJ, Suhocki P, McCann R. Hemodialysis arteriovenous access: detection of stenosis and response to treatment by vascular access blood flow. Kidney Int. 2001;59(1):358–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwab SJ, Harrington JT, Singh A, et al. Vascular access for hemodialysis [clinical conference]. Kidney Int. 1999;55(5):2078–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller CD, Robbin ML, Barker J, Allon M. Comparison of arteriovenous grafts in the thigh and upper extremities in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(11):2942–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ram SJ, Sachdeva BA, Caldito GC, Zibari GB, Abreo KD. Thigh grafts contribute significantly to patients’ time on dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(7):1229–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McAllister TN, Maruszewski M, Garrido SA, et al. Effectiveness of haemodialysis access with an autologous tissue-engineered vascular graft: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet. 2009;373(9673):1440–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baek I, Bai CZ, Hwang J, Park J, Park JS, Kim DJ. Suppression of neointimal hyperplasia by sirolimus-eluting expanded PTFE haemodialysis grafts in comparison with paclitaxel-coated grafts. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(5):1997–2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal AK, Haddad NJ, Patel BM. Central vein stenosis: a nephrologist’s perspective. Semin Dial. 2007;20(1):53–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hodges TC, Fillinger MF, Zwolak RM, Walsh DB, Bech F, Cronenwett JL. Longitudinal comparison of dialysis access methods: risk factors for failure. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26(6):1009–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Konner K, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Roys EC, Port FK. Tailoring the initial vascular access for dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;62(1):329–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoggard J, Saad T, Schon D, et al. Guidelines for venous access in patients with chronic kidney disease. A position statement from the American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology, Clinical Practice Committee and the Association for Vascular Access. Semin Dial. 2008;21(2):186–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Kidney Foundation. NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access, guideline 8: timing of access placement. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37 Suppl 1:S137–81.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Beathard, GA. Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. 2003. Retrieved on Mar 2012 from www.esrdnetwork.org

  31. National Kidney Foundation. NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access: guideline 1: patient history and physical examination prior to permanent access selections. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37 Suppl 1:S141.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beathard GA. Complications of vascular access. In: Lamiere N, Mehta R, editors. Complications of dialysis – recognition and management. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2000. p. 1–27.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Silva MB, Hobson RW, Pappas PJ, et al. A strategy for increasing use of autogenous hemodialysis access procedures: impact of preoperative noninvasive evaluation. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27(2):302–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hirai M, Kawai S. False positive and negative results in Allen test. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1980;21(3):353–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ruland O, Borkenhagen N, Prien T. [The Doppler palm test]. Ultraschall Med. 1988;9(2):63–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Allon M, Lockhart ME, Lilly RZ, et al. Effect of preoperative sonographic mapping on vascular access outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2001;60(5):2013–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Silva MB, Hobson RW, Pappas PJ, et al. Vein transposition in the forearm for autogenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26(6):981–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Robbin ML, Chamberlain NE, Lockhart ME, et al. Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula maturity: US evaluation. Radiology. 2002;225(1):59–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Beathard GA, Settle SM, Shields MW. Salvage of the nonfunctioning arteriovenous fistula. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33(5):910–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Robbin ML, Gallichio MH, Deierhoi MH, Young CJ, Weber TM, Allon M. US vascular mapping before hemodialysis access placement. Radiology. 2000;217(1):83–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Migliacci R, Selli ML, Falcinelli F, et al. Assessment of occlusion of the vascular access in patients on chronic hemodialysis: comparison of physical examination with continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound. Nephron. 1999;82(1):7–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beathard GA, Arnold P, Jackson J, Litchfield T. Physician Operators Forum Of RMS Lifeline. Aggressive treatment of early fistula failure. Kidney Int. 2003;64(4):1487–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Beathard GA. Interventionalist’s role in identifying candidates for secondary fistulas. Semin Dial. 2004;17(3):233–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Oliver MJ, McCann RL, Indridason OS, Butterly DW, Schwab SJ. Comparison of transposed brachiobasilic fistulas to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulas. Kidney Int. 2001;60(4):1532–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ascher E, Hingorani AP, Yorkovich WR. Techniques and outcome after brachiocephalic and brachiobasilic arteriovenous AVF creation. In: Gray R, Sands J, editors. A multidisciplinary approach for hemodialysis access. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Beathard GA. Complications of vascular access. In: Lamiere N, Mehta R, editors. Complications of dialysis – recognition and management. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vachharajani T. Atlas of hemodialysis access. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil K. Agarwal MD, FACP, FASN, FNKF .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shah, R., Agarwal, A.K. (2014). Approach to Arteriovenous Access. In: Yevzlin, A., Asif, A., Salman, L. (eds) Interventional Nephrology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8803-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8803-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8802-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8803-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics