Skip to main content

CO2 Laser-Assisted Deep Sclerectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma
  • 1214 Accesses

Abstract

CO2 laser-assisted deep sclerectomy (CLASS) is a procedure which enables an accurate dissection of the scleral wall and unroofing of the Schlemm’s canal by utilizing the unique physical properties of the CO2 laser and its ability to ablate dry tissue with almost complete absorption of the energy by percolating aqueous humor. By this, it protects deeper tissues like the trabecular meshwork from the laser energy and avoids penetrating the anterior chamber (making this procedure practically an extraocular procedure). It has an excellent safety and efficacy profile and enables the surgeon and patient to enjoy the advantages of a procedure with a very short learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR, et al. Visual field progression in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2):200–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, et al. Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with or without phacoemulsification: a randomized clinical trial. J Glaucoma. 2004;13(6):500–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP. The national survey of trabeculectomy. III. Early and late complications. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(3):297–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stalmans I, Gillis A, Lafaut AS, Zeyen T. Safe trabeculectomy technique: long term outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(1):44–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ang GS, Varga Z, Shaarawy T. Postoperative infection in penetrating versus non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(12):1571–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel S, Pasquale LR. Glaucoma drainage devices: a review of the past, present, and future. Semin Ophthalmol. 2010;25(5–6):265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Melamed S, Ben Simon GJ, Goldenfeld M, Simon G. Efficacy and safety of gold micro shunt implantation to the supraciliary space in patients with glaucoma: a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(3):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krasnov MM. Sinusotomy in glaucoma. Vestn Oftalmol. 1964;77:37–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker WM, Kanagasundaram CR. Surgery of the canal of Schlemm. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1964;84:427–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sourdille P, Santiago PY, Villain F, et al. Reticulated hyaluronic acid implant in nonperforating trabecular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(3):332–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarodia U, Shaarawy T, Barton K. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery: a critical evaluation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18(2):152–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiselita D. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma surgery. Eye (Lond). 2001;15(Pt 2):197–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, Ford VJ, et al. Trabeculectomy vs. nonpenetrating trabeculectomy: a retrospective study of two procedures in phakic patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984;15(9):734–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hondur A, Onol M, Hasanreisoglu B. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery: meta-analysis of recent results. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(2):139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendrinos E, Mermoud A, Shaarawy T. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53(6):592–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khaw PT, Siriwardena D. “New” surgical treatments for glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(1):1–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Assia EI. Non penetrating filtration surgery with CO2 laser. In: Garg A, Rosen E, editors. Instant clinical diagnosis in ophthalmology – glaucoma. St. Louis: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publisher LTD; 2009. p. 292–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chai D, Chaudhary G, Mikula E, et al. In vivo femtosecond laser subsurface scleral treatment in rabbit eyes. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42(7):647–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Trope GE, Rootman D. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy for glaucoma surgery using the femtosecond laser: a laboratory model. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(12):1713–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Argento C, Sanseau AC, Badoza D, Casiraghi J. Deep sclerectomy with a collagen implant using the excimer laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(4):504–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klink T, Schlunck G, Lieb WE, et al. Long-term results of Erbium YAG-laser-assisted deep sclerectomy. Eye (Lond). 2008;22(3):370–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pallikaris IG, Kozobolis VP, Christodoulakis EV. Erbium: YAG laser deep sclerectomy: an alternative approach to glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003;34(5):375–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Assia EI, Rotenstreich Y, Barequet IS, et al. Experimental studies on nonpenetrating filtration surgery using the CO2 laser. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245(6):847–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ton Y, Geffen N, Kidron D, et al. CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery part I: concept and experimental models. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(2):135–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Geffen N, Ton Y, Degani J, Assia EI. CO2 laser-assisted sclerectomy surgery, part II: multicenter clinical preliminary study. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(3):193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Geffen N, Assia EI, Melamed S. Laser-assisted techniques for penetrating and nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. 2012;50:96–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng JW, Cai JP, Li Y, Wei RL. Intraoperative mitomycin C for nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(5):322–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alon Skaat MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skaat, A., Melamed, S. (2014). CO2 Laser-Assisted Deep Sclerectomy. In: Samples, J.R., Ahmed, I.I.K. (eds) Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8347-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8348-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics