Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disparities in Adolescent Patient–Provider Communication Regarding Fertility Preservation Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncofertility Communication

Abstract

Cancer affects large numbers of men and women of reproductive age. The effects of cancer and cancer therapies can render patients’ reproductive potential transiently or permanently impaired. With the release of the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations, a heightened sense of awareness of these clinical issues has developed. While progress has been made in delivering fertility preservation care to both males and females, it is clear that much work has yet to be done in providing patients with treatments that will mitigate the potentially sterilizing effects of oncologic therapies. Moreover, disparities have been noted throughout the literature along the lines of both gender and age, with females and adolescents having less access to fertility preservation options. Our aim in this chapter is to heighten awareness of the existing disparities and encourage providers to more effectively utilize communication strategies to optimize comprehensive oncologic care for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2004. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.

  2. Bleyer A, O’Leary M, Barr R, Ries LAG, editors. Cancer epidemiology in older adolescents and young adults 15 to 29 years of age, including SEER incidence and survival: 1975–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee SJ. American society of clinical oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2917–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1622–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2680–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheth KR, Sharma V, Helfand BT, et al. Improved fertility preservation care for male patients with cancer after establishment of formalized oncofertility program. J Urol. 2012;183:979–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeltzer LK. Cancer in adolescents and young adults psychosocial aspects. Long-term survivors. Cancer. 1993;71:3463–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burns KC, Boudreau C, Panepinto JA. Attitudes regarding fertility preservation in female adolescent cancer patients. J Hematol Oncol. 2006;28:350–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nieman CL, Kinahan KE, Yount SE, et al. Fertility preservation and adolescent cancer patients: lessons from adult survivors of childhood cancer and their parents. Cancer Treat Res. 2007;138:201–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST. Fertility preservation and adolescent/young adult cancer patients: physician communication challenges. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44:394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Edge B. Sperm banking in adolescent cancer patients. Arch Dis Child. 2005;91:149–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ginsberg JP, Ogle SK, Tuchman LK, et al. Sperm banking for adolescent and young adult cancer patients: sperm quality, patient, and parent perspectives. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50:594–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, et al. Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1880–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fertile Hope. Pediatrics—information for parents. 2012. http://www.fertilehope.org/learn-more/cancer-and-fertility-info/pediatrics.cfm. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.

  15. Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA. Having children after cancer: a pilot survey of survivors’ attitudes and experiences. Cancer. 1999;86:697–709.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Revel A, Haimovkochman R, Porat A, et al. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection success rates with cryopreserved sperm from patients with malignant disease. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:118–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Borini A, Bonu M, Coticchio G, Bianchi V, Cattoli M, Flamigni C. Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:601–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Borini A, Lagalla C, Bonu MA, Bianchi V, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Cumulative pregnancy rates resulting from the use of fresh and frozen oocytes: 7 years’ experience. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:481–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Köhler TS, Kondapalli LA, Shah A, Chan S, Woodruff TK, Brannigan RE. Results from the Survey for Preservation of Adolescent REproduction (SPARE) study: gender disparity in delivery of fertility preservation message to adolescents with cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;28:269–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kliesch S, Behre HM, Jürgens H, Nieschlag H. Cryopreservation of semen from adolescent patients with malignancies. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1996;26:20–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neal M, Nagel K, Duckworth J, et al. Effectiveness of sperm banking in adolescents and young adults with cancer, a regional experience. Cancer. 2007;110:1125–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson RA, Weddell A, Spoudeas HA, et al. Do doctors discuss fertility issues before they treat young patients with cancer? Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2246–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagel K, Neal M. Discussions regarding sperm banking with adolescent and young adult males who have cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2008;25:102–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vadaparampil S, Quinn G, King L, Wilson C, Nieder M. Barriers to fertility preservation among pediatric oncologists. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72:402–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meisel A. The “exceptions” to the informed consent doctrine: striking a balance between competing values in medical decisionmaking. Wis Law Rev. 1979;2:413–88.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meisel A, Roth LH, Lindz CW. Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent. Am J Psychiatry. 1977;134:285–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen CB. Ethical issues regarding fertility preservation in adolescents and children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:249–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weithorn L, Campbell SB. The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Dev. 1982;53:1589–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zwaanswijk M, Tates K, Dulmen SV, Hoogerbrugge PM, Kamps WA, Bensing JM. Young patients’, parents’, and survivors’ communication preferences in paediatric oncology: results of online focus groups. BMC Pediatr. 2007;7:35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zoloth L, Backhus L, Woodruff TK. Waiting to be born: the ethical implications of the generation of “NUBorn” and “NUAge” mice from pre-pubertal ovarian tissue. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8:21–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Oncofertility Consortium NIH 5UL1DE019587.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Feinberg School of Medicines, Northwestern University, 300 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA

    Amanda B. Fuchs B.A.

  2. Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Robert E. Brannigan M.D.

Authors
  1. Amanda B. Fuchs B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert E. Brannigan M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda B. Fuchs B.A. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Teresa K Woodruff

  2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Ctr Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Marla L Clayman

  3. Oncofertility Consortium, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Kate E Waimey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, A.B., Brannigan, R.E. (2014). Disparities in Adolescent Patient–Provider Communication Regarding Fertility Preservation Care. In: Woodruff, T., Clayman, M., Waimey, K. (eds) Oncofertility Communication. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8235-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8235-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8234-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8235-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation