Abstract
The correction of strictures involving the fossa navicularis and meatus poses a distinct challenge. Unlike surgical repair of strictures involving other urethral segments where the primary concern is restoration of urethral patency, management of glanular urethral strictures also requires particular attention to cosmesis. Various options are available, the choice of which depends on the etiology and characteristics of the stricture, prior failed procedures, the patient’s expectations, and the surgeon’s operative familiarity and preference. No single technique is applicable to all strictures. In general, minimally invasive procedures are usually palliative, whereas reconstructive procedures should be performed with a curative intent. Paramount to the success of any reconstructive procedure is the careful selection of non-diseased tissue for urethral substitution. If the penile skin is healthy and the glans is not extensively involved with LSA, our preferred urethral substitute is the fasciocutaneous ventral penile transverse island flap. In cases of extensive LSA or penile scarring, extragenital tissue transfer techniques should be considered, preferably in one stage, using the versatile buccal mucosal graft. Equally important is the choice of glanuloplasty. Where possible, a glans-cap repair is preferred because of the limited dissection required with this relatively simple technique.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kurzrock EA, Baskin LS, Cunha G. Ontogeny of the male urethra: theory of endodermal differentiation. Differentiation. 1999;64:115–22.
Stűhmer A. Balanitis xerotica obliterans (post operationem) und ihre Beziehungen zur “Kraurosis glandis et praeputii penis”. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1928;156:613–23.
Thomas RHM, Ridley CM, Black MM. The association of lichen sclerosus and atrophicus and autoimmune-related disease in males. Br J Dermatol. 1983;109:661–4.
Pugliese JM, Morey AF, Peterson AC. Lichen sclerosus: review of the literature and current recommendations for management. J Urol. 2007;178:2268–76.
Schinella RA, Miranda D. Posthitis xerotica obliterans in circumcision specimens. Urology. 1974;3:348–51.
Kiss A, Király L, Kutasy B, Merksz M. High incidence of balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys with phimosis: prospective 10-year study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:305–8.
Kizer WS, Prarie T, Morey AF. Balanitis xerotica obliterans: epidemiologic distribution in an equal access health care system. South Med J. 2003;96:9–11.
Bainbridge DR, Whitaker RH, Chir M, Shepheard BGF. Balanitis xerotica obliterans and urinary obstruction. Br J Urol. 1971;43:487–91.
Meffert JJ, Davis BM, Grimwood RE. Lichen sclerosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32:393–416.
Pietrzak P, Hadway P, Corbishley CM, Watkin NA. Is the association between balanitis xerotica obliterans and penile carcinoma underestimated? BJU Int. 2006;98:74–6.
Depasquale I, Park AJ, Bracka A. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. BJU Int. 2000;86:459–65.
Vincent MV, MacKinnon E. The response of clinical balanitis xerotica obliterans to the application of topical steroid-based creams. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:709–12.
Pandher BS, Rustin MHA, Kaisary AV. Treatment of balanitis xerotical obliterans with topical tacrolimus. J Urol. 2003;170:923.
Ioannides D, Lazaridou E, Apalla Z, Sotiriou E, Gregoriou S, Rigopoulos D. Acitretin for severe lichen sclerosus of male genitalia: a randomized, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2010;183:1395–9.
Gokhale BB, Mehta LN. Histopathology of vitiliginous skin. Int J Dermatol. 1983;22:477–80.
Lentz Jr HC, Mebust WK, Foret JD, Melchior J. Urethral strictures following transurethral prostatectomy: review of 2,223 resections. J Urol. 1977;117:194–6.
Mundy AR. The long-term results of skin inlay urethroplasty. Br J Urol. 1995;75:59–61.
Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Substitution urethroplasty with buccal mucosal-free grafts. J Urol. 2001;165: 1131–4.
Morey AF. Urethral plate salvage with dorsal graft promotes successful penile flap onlay reconstruction of severe pendulous strictures. J Urol. 2001;166:1376–8.
Gelman J, Sohn W. 1-stage repair of obliterative distal urethral strictures with buccal graft urethral plate reconstruction and simultaneous onlay penile skin flap. J Urol. 2011;186:935–8.
Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The problems of penile urethroplasty with particular reference to 2 stage reconstructions. J Urol. 2003;170:87–9.
Dubey D, Sehgal A, Srivastava A, Mandhani A, Kapoor R, Kumar A. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans related urethral strictures: the outcome of 1 and 2-stage techniques. J Urol. 2005;173:463–6.
Peterson CA, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M, Guanzoni G, Barbagli G, Webster GD. Heroic measures may not always be justified in extensive urethral stricture due to lichen sclerosus (balanitis xerotica obliterans). Urology. 2004;64:565–8.
Devine Jr CJ, Franz JP, Horton CE. Evaluation and treatment of patients with failed hypospadias repair. J Urol. 1987;119:223–6.
Humby G. A one-stage operation for hypospadias. Br J Surg. 1941;29:84–92.
Bűrger RA, Műller SC, El-Damanhoury H, Tschakaloff A, Riedmiller H, Hohenfellner R. The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report. J Urol. 1992;147:662–4.
Dessanti A, Rigamonti W, Merulla V, Falchetti D, Caccia G. Autologus buccal mucosa graft for hypospadias repair: an initial report. J Urol. 1992;147:1081–3.
El-Kasaby AW, Fath-Alla M, Noweir AM, El-Halaby MR, Zakaria W, el-Beialy MH. The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral strictures. J Urol. 1993;149:276–8.
Morey AF, McAninch JW. Technique of harvesting buccal mucosa for urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 1996;155:1696–7.
Wood DN, Allen SE, Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain. J Urol. 2004;162:580–3.
Dublin N, Stewart L. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int. 2004;94:867–9.
Jamal JE, Kellner DS, Fracchia JA, Armenakas NA. A randomized prospective trial of primary versus AlloDerm closure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site for substitution urethroplasty. Urology. 2010;75:695–700.
Cohney BC. A penile flap procedure for the relief of meatal stricture. Br J Urol. 1963;35:182–3.
Blandy JP, Tresidder GC. Meatoplasty. Br J Urol. 1967;39:633–4.
Brannen GE. Meatal reconstruction. J Urol. 1976;116:319–21.
De Sy WA. Aesthetic repair of meatal stricture. J Urol. 1984;132:678–9.
Venn SN, Mundy AR. Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol. 1998;81:735–7.
Jordan GH. Reconstruction of the fossa navicularis. J Urol. 1987;138:102–4.
Armenakas NA, Morey AF, McAninch JW. Reconstruction of resistant strictures of the fossa navicularis and meatus. J Urol. 1998;160:359–63.
Virasoro R, Eltahawy EA, Jordan GH. Long-term follow-up for reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis with a single technique. BJU Int. 2007;110:1143–5.
Önol SY, Önol FF, Onur S, Inal H, Akbaş A, Kose O. Reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis and meatus with transverse island fasciocutaneous penile flap. J Urol. 2008;179:1437–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armenakas, N.A. (2014). Fossa Navicularis and Meatal Reconstruction. In: Brandes, S., Morey, A. (eds) Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7707-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7708-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)