Skip to main content

Fossa Navicularis and Meatal Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 2295 Accesses

Abstract

The correction of strictures involving the fossa navicularis and meatus poses a distinct challenge. Unlike surgical repair of strictures involving other urethral segments where the primary concern is restoration of urethral patency, management of glanular urethral strictures also requires particular attention to cosmesis. Various options are available, the choice of which depends on the etiology and characteristics of the stricture, prior failed procedures, the patient’s expectations, and the surgeon’s operative familiarity and preference. No single technique is applicable to all strictures. In general, minimally invasive procedures are usually palliative, whereas reconstructive procedures should be performed with a curative intent. Paramount to the success of any reconstructive procedure is the careful selection of non-diseased tissue for urethral substitution. If the penile skin is healthy and the glans is not extensively involved with LSA, our preferred urethral substitute is the fasciocutaneous ventral penile transverse island flap. In cases of extensive LSA or penile scarring, extragenital tissue transfer techniques should be considered, preferably in one stage, using the versatile buccal mucosal graft. Equally important is the choice of glanuloplasty. Where possible, a glans-cap repair is preferred because of the limited dissection required with this relatively simple technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kurzrock EA, Baskin LS, Cunha G. Ontogeny of the male urethra: theory of endodermal differentiation. Differentiation. 1999;64:115–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stűhmer A. Balanitis xerotica obliterans (post operationem) und ihre Beziehungen zur “Kraurosis glandis et praeputii penis”. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1928;156:613–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas RHM, Ridley CM, Black MM. The association of lichen sclerosus and atrophicus and autoimmune-related disease in males. Br J Dermatol. 1983;109:661–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pugliese JM, Morey AF, Peterson AC. Lichen sclerosus: review of the literature and current recommendations for management. J Urol. 2007;178:2268–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schinella RA, Miranda D. Posthitis xerotica obliterans in circumcision specimens. Urology. 1974;3:348–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiss A, Király L, Kutasy B, Merksz M. High incidence of balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys with phimosis: prospective 10-year study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:305–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kizer WS, Prarie T, Morey AF. Balanitis xerotica obliterans: epidemiologic distribution in an equal access health care system. South Med J. 2003;96:9–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bainbridge DR, Whitaker RH, Chir M, Shepheard BGF. Balanitis xerotica obliterans and urinary obstruction. Br J Urol. 1971;43:487–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meffert JJ, Davis BM, Grimwood RE. Lichen sclerosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32:393–416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pietrzak P, Hadway P, Corbishley CM, Watkin NA. Is the association between balanitis xerotica obliterans and penile carcinoma underestimated? BJU Int. 2006;98:74–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Depasquale I, Park AJ, Bracka A. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. BJU Int. 2000;86:459–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vincent MV, MacKinnon E. The response of clinical balanitis xerotica obliterans to the application of topical steroid-based creams. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:709–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pandher BS, Rustin MHA, Kaisary AV. Treatment of balanitis xerotical obliterans with topical tacrolimus. J Urol. 2003;170:923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ioannides D, Lazaridou E, Apalla Z, Sotiriou E, Gregoriou S, Rigopoulos D. Acitretin for severe lichen sclerosus of male genitalia: a randomized, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2010;183:1395–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gokhale BB, Mehta LN. Histopathology of vitiliginous skin. Int J Dermatol. 1983;22:477–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lentz Jr HC, Mebust WK, Foret JD, Melchior J. Urethral strictures following transurethral prostatectomy: review of 2,223 resections. J Urol. 1977;117:194–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mundy AR. The long-term results of skin inlay urethroplasty. Br J Urol. 1995;75:59–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Substitution urethroplasty with buccal mucosal-free grafts. J Urol. 2001;165: 1131–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morey AF. Urethral plate salvage with dorsal graft promotes successful penile flap onlay reconstruction of severe pendulous strictures. J Urol. 2001;166:1376–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gelman J, Sohn W. 1-stage repair of obliterative distal urethral strictures with buccal graft urethral plate reconstruction and simultaneous onlay penile skin flap. J Urol. 2011;186:935–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The problems of penile urethroplasty with particular reference to 2 stage reconstructions. J Urol. 2003;170:87–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dubey D, Sehgal A, Srivastava A, Mandhani A, Kapoor R, Kumar A. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans related urethral strictures: the outcome of 1 and 2-stage techniques. J Urol. 2005;173:463–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peterson CA, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M, Guanzoni G, Barbagli G, Webster GD. Heroic measures may not always be justified in extensive urethral stricture due to lichen sclerosus (balanitis xerotica obliterans). Urology. 2004;64:565–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Devine Jr CJ, Franz JP, Horton CE. Evaluation and treatment of patients with failed hypospadias repair. J Urol. 1987;119:223–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Humby G. A one-stage operation for hypospadias. Br J Surg. 1941;29:84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bűrger RA, Műller SC, El-Damanhoury H, Tschakaloff A, Riedmiller H, Hohenfellner R. The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report. J Urol. 1992;147:662–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dessanti A, Rigamonti W, Merulla V, Falchetti D, Caccia G. Autologus buccal mucosa graft for hypospadias repair: an initial report. J Urol. 1992;147:1081–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Kasaby AW, Fath-Alla M, Noweir AM, El-Halaby MR, Zakaria W, el-Beialy MH. The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral strictures. J Urol. 1993;149:276–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morey AF, McAninch JW. Technique of harvesting buccal mucosa for urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 1996;155:1696–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wood DN, Allen SE, Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain. J Urol. 2004;162:580–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dublin N, Stewart L. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int. 2004;94:867–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jamal JE, Kellner DS, Fracchia JA, Armenakas NA. A randomized prospective trial of primary versus AlloDerm closure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site for substitution urethroplasty. Urology. 2010;75:695–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohney BC. A penile flap procedure for the relief of meatal stricture. Br J Urol. 1963;35:182–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Blandy JP, Tresidder GC. Meatoplasty. Br J Urol. 1967;39:633–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brannen GE. Meatal reconstruction. J Urol. 1976;116:319–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. De Sy WA. Aesthetic repair of meatal stricture. J Urol. 1984;132:678–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Venn SN, Mundy AR. Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol. 1998;81:735–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jordan GH. Reconstruction of the fossa navicularis. J Urol. 1987;138:102–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Armenakas NA, Morey AF, McAninch JW. Reconstruction of resistant strictures of the fossa navicularis and meatus. J Urol. 1998;160:359–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Virasoro R, Eltahawy EA, Jordan GH. Long-term follow-up for reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis with a single technique. BJU Int. 2007;110:1143–5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Önol SY, Önol FF, Onur S, Inal H, Akbaş A, Kose O. Reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis and meatus with transverse island fasciocutaneous penile flap. J Urol. 2008;179:1437–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noel A. Armenakas MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armenakas, N.A. (2014). Fossa Navicularis and Meatal Reconstruction. In: Brandes, S., Morey, A. (eds) Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7707-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7708-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics