Abstract
Biological microstructures such as synapses, dendritic spines, subcellular domains, sensor cells, and many other structures are regulated by chemical reactions that involve only a small number of molecules, that is, between a few and up to thousands of molecules. Traditional chemical kinetics theory may provide an inadequate description of chemical reactions in such microdomains. Models with a small number of diffusers can be used to describe noise due to gating of ionic channels by random binding and unbinding of ligands in biological sensor cells, such as olfactory cilia, photoreceptors, and hair cells in the cochlea. A chemical reaction that involves only 10–100 proteins can cause a qualitative transition in the physiological behavior of a given part of a cell. Large fluctuations should be expected in a reaction if so few molecules are involved, both in transient and persistent binding and unbinding reactions. In the latter case, large fluctuations in the number of bound molecules can force the physiological state to change all the time, unless there is a specific mechanism that prevents the switch and stabilizes the physiological state. Therefore, a theory of chemical kinetics of such reactions is needed to predict the threshold at which switches occur and to explain how the physiological function is regulated in molecular terms at a subcellular level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Berne, B.J. and R. Pecora (1976), Dynamic Light Scattering with Applications to Chemistry, Biology, and Physics. Wiley-Interscience NY.
Blomberg, F., R.S. Cohen, and P. Siekevitz (1977), “The structure of postsynaptic densities isolated from dog cerebral cortex, II. Characterization and arrangement of some of the major protein within the structure,” J. Cell Biol., 74 (1), 204–225.
Bonhoeffer, T. and R. Yuste (2002), “Spine motility: phenomenology, mechanisms, and function,” Neuron, 35 (6), 1019–1027.
Chandrasekhar, S. (1943), “Stochastic Problems In Physics and Astronomy,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 15, 2–89.
Crick, F. “Do dendritic spines twitch?” Trends Neurosci, 5, 44–46.
Dunaevsky, A., A. Tashiro, A. Majewska, C. Mason, R. Yuste (1999), “Developmental regulation of spine motility in the mammalian central nervous system,” PNAS, 96 (23), 13438–13443.
Fischer, M., S. Kaech, D. Knutti, A. Matus (1998, “Rapid actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines,” Neuron, 20 (5), 847–854).
Fischer, M., S. Kaech, U. Wagner, H. Brinkhaus, A. Matus (2000), “Glutamate receptors regulate actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines,” Nat. Neurosci., 3 (9), 887–894.
Hänggi, P., P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec (1990), “50 years after Kramers,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 62, 251–341.
Haynes, L.W., A.R. Kay, K.W. Yau (1986), “Single cyclic GMP-activated channel activity in excised patches of rod outer segment membrane,” Nature, 321 (6065), 66–70.
Holcman, D., Z. Schuss, and E. Korkotian (2004), “Calcium dynamics in dendritic spines and spine motility,” Biophys J., 87, 81–91.
Kandel, E.R., J.H. Schwartz, T.M. Jessell (2000), Principles of Neural Science, McGraw-Hill, New York, 4th edition.
Koch, C. (1999), Biophysics of Computation, Oxford University Press, NY.
Koch, C. and A. Zador (1993), “The function of dendritic spines: Devices subserving biochemical rather than electrical compartmentalization,” J. Neurosci., 13, 413–422.
Koch, C. and I. Segev (editors) (2001), Methods in Neuronal Modeling (3rd printing), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Korkotian, E. and M. Segal (2001), “Spike-associated fast contraction of dendritic spines in cultured hippocampal neurons,” Neuron, 30 (3), 751–758.
Kramers, H.A. (1940), “Brownian motion in field of force and diffusion model of chemical reaction,” Physica, 7, 284–304.
Landau, L.D. and E.M. Lifshitz (1975), Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.
Lisman, J. (1994), “The CAM kinase II hypothesis for the storage of synaptic memory,” Trends Neurosci., 10, 406–412.
Lisman, J. (2003), “Long-term potentiation: outstanding questions and attempted synthesis,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 29 (358(1432)), 829–842.
Majewska, A., A. Tashiro, and R. Yuste (2000a), “Regulation of spine calcium dynamics by rapid spine motility,” J. Neurosci., 20 (22), 8262–8268.
Majewska, A., E. Brown, J. Ross, R. Yuste (2000b), “Mechanisms of calcium decay kinetics in hippocampal spines: role of spine calcium pumps and calcium diffusion through the spine neck in biochemical compartmentalization,” J. Neurosci., 20 (5), 1722–1734.
Malenka, R.C., J.A. Kauer, D.J. Perkel, and R.A. Nicoll (1989), “The impact of postsynaptic calcium on synaptic transmission—its role in long-term potentiation,” Trends Neurosci., 12 (11), 444–450.
Matkowsky, B.J. and Z. Schuss (1977), “The exit problem for randomly perturbed dynamical systems,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 33, 365–382.
Morales, M., E. Fifkova (1989), “Distribution of MAP2 in dendritic spines and its colocalization with actin. An immunogold electron-microscope study,” Cell Tissue Res., 256 (3), 447–456.
Nadler, B., T. Naeh, and Z. Schuss (2002), “The stationary arrival process of diffusing particles from a continuum to an absorbing boundary is Poissonian,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 62 (2), 433–447.
Nimchinsky, E.A., B.L. Sabatini, K. Svoboda (2002), “Structure and function of dendritic spines,” Annu. Rev. Physiol., 64, 313–335.
Picones, A. and J.I. Korenbrot (1994), “Analysis of fluctuations in the CGMP-dependent currents of cone photoreceptor outer segments,” Biophys. J. 66, (2, Part 1), 360–365.
Ramón y Cajal, S. (1909), “Les nouvelles idées sur la structure du système nerveux chez l’homme et chez les vertébrés,” Transl. L. Azouly, Malaine, Paris, France. “New ideas on the structure of the nervous system of man and vertebrates,” Transl. N. & N.L. Swanson, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1991.
Rieke, F. and D.A. Baylor (1996), “Molecular origin of continuous dark noise in rod photoreceptors,” Biophys J, 71, 2553–2572.
Sabatini, B.L., M. Maravall, and K. Svoboda (2001), “Ca2 + signalling in dendritic spines,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 11 (3), 349–356.
Schuss, Z. (2010b), Theory and Applications of Stochastic Processes, and Analytical Approach, Springer series on Applied Mathematical Sciences 170, NY.
Segev, I. and W. Rall (1988), “Computational study of an excitable dendritic spine,” J. Neurophysiology, 60 (6), 499–523.
Shepherd, G.M. (1996), “The dendritic spine: a multi-functional integrative unit,” J. Neurophysiology, 75 (6), 2197–2210.
Volfovsky, N., H. Parnas, M. Segal, and E. Korkotian (1999), “Geometry of dendritic spines affects calcium dynamics in hippocampal neurons: theory and experiments,” J. Neurophysiol., 82, 450–454.
Yuste, R. and W. Denk (1995), “Dendritic spines as basic functional units of neuronal integration,” Nature, 375 (6533), 682–684.
Zador, A., C. Koch, and T.H. Brown (1990), “Biophysical model of a Hebbian synapse,” PNAS, 87, 6718–6722.
Zucker, R.S. and W.G. Regehr (2002), “Short-term synaptic plasticity,” Ann. Rev. Physiol., 64, 355–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Author
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schuss, Z. (2013). Brownian Models of Chemical Reactions in Microdomains. In: Brownian Dynamics at Boundaries and Interfaces. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 186. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7687-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7687-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7686-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7687-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)