Skip to main content

Beyond Ethnic Intolerance: Traces and Benefits of Ethnic Diversity in Post-War Bosnia-Herzegovina

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS,volume 17))

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors revisit the issue of intergroup contact and its effect on prejudice towards out-groups. They argue that the critical point is to understand under which specific conditions the experience of heterogeneity can actually lead to constructive intergroup relations. The aim of this study is to investigate when the co-presence of different ethnic groups within a society leads to positive or negative intergroup relationships. Bosnia and Herzegovina is treated as a case study of conflict of interests and the emergence of cross-cultural identities. Indeed, former Bosnia and Herzegovina was characterised by high levels of ethnic heterogeneity and cultural diversity, which were redesigned by the war conflict of the 90s. On the basis of analyses of TRACES data, the authors considered under which psychological conditions the contextual heterogeneity constructively influenced adult attitudes towards others and society. The effects of growing up in a heterogonous context on adult levels of tolerance, their sense of agency and their trust in social norms were investigated. The results suggest that the context in which people currently live is more salient than the one in which they grew up and that heterogeneity in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina buffers people against a sense of anomy. However, heterogeneity does not protect individuals who highly identify with their ethnic in-group against intergroup intolerance. In other words, the effects of contextual heterogeneity on attitudes towards out-groups—and on discouragement about social life—are moderated by ethnic identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some areas were merged due to a lack of information on municipalities, which rendered it impossible to reconstruct some of the TRACES territorial divisions.

  2. 2.

    The Brcko district remained under the administration of the International Community, in accordance with the Dayton Agreement. It was an “experimental” field of community reconstruction and multiethnic administration (Jeffrey 2006).

  3. 3.

    ELF was computed on the basis of 1991 census data. This index measures the probability that two randomly selected individuals from the whole population will be from different groups. The ELF index was created by Soviet scholars (Atlas Narodov Mira 1964) and was later popularised by Taylor and Hudson (1972). It is expressed by the formula: \( ELF\, = \,1 - \,\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^N {q_i^2} \) where \( {q_i} \) is the share of group i of a total of N groups.

  4. 4.

    The unweighted indicator of risk of victimisation computed for each survey area is defined by the ratio between the estimated number of events (i.e., individual-quarter units corresponding to the occurrence of an event) in the population of an area by the estimated total number of individual-quarter units in that population.

  5. 5.

    Example items of the scale are as follows: With everything so uncertain these days, it almost seems as though anything could happen; Everything changes so quickly these days that I often have trouble deciding which are the right rules to follow; People were better off in the old days when everyone knew just how he was expected to act; It seems to me that other people find it easier to decide what is right than I do.

  6. 6.

    Equivalent results were obtained using polarisation (Reynal-Querol 2002) instead of fractionalisation to measure heterogeneity and controlling for the heterogeneity of the cantons in which people had resided during adolescence (Morselli and Passini 2009).

References

  • Aghion, P., Alesina, A., & Trebbi, F. (2002). Endogenous political institutions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 565–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 762–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 319–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1997). Categorization, recategorization, and common ingroup identity. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 236–256). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas Narodov Mira (1964). Moscow: Miklukho-Maklai Ethnological Institute of the Department of Geodesy and Cartography of the State Geological Committee of the Soviet Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M. (1967). Towards a theory of minority group relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, T. (2003). Determinants of national identity in East and West Germany: An empirical comparison of theories on the significance of authoritarianism, anomie, and general self-esteem. Political Psychology, 24, 259–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blimes, R. (2006). The indirect effect of ethnic heterogeneity on the likelihood of civil war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 536–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouris, E. (2007). Complex political victims. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringa, T. R. (1995). Being Muslim the Bosnian way: Identity and community in a central Bosnian village. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1999). National deconstruction: Violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning, D., & Fay, M. (1993). The effect of transportation networks on economic growth. Discussion paper. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenders, M. (2001). Nationalistic attitudes and ethnic exclusionism in a comparative perspective: an empirical study of attitudes toward the country and ethnic immigrants in 22 countries. Netherlands: Doctoral thesis at the Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS) in Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 563–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., & Sambanis, N. (2005). The Collier-Hoeffler model of civil war onset and the case study project research design. In P. Collier & N. Sambanis (Eds.), Understanding civil war—Europe, Central Asia, and other regions: Evidence and a nalysis (pp. 1–33). Washington: World Bank Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. W. (1984). Cooperative interaction in multiethnic contexts. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 155–185). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W., & Levine R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(4), 1203–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Europe (2004). Economic Survey of Europe, 1. United Nations Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbadawi, I., & Sambanis, N. (2002). How much civil war will we see? Explaining the prevalence of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46, 307–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Stability Initiative (2004). Making federalism work. A radical proposal for practical reform. ESI Discussion papers. Retrieved on January 8, 2004 from http://www.esiweb.org.

  • French, S. E., Seidman, E., Allen, L., & Aber, J. L. (2006). The development of ethnic identity during adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common in-group identity on reducing inter-group bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224−249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. L. (1992). The political consequences of intolerance: Cultural conformity and political freedom. The American Political Science Review, 86(2), 338–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A. (1973). Mass political violence: A cross-national causal analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns. Psychological Science, 7, 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huschka, D., & Mau, S. (2006). Social anomie and racial segregation in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 76, 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Crisis Group (2003). Building bridges in Mostar. Europe Report, 150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferey, A. (2006). Building state capacity in post-conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina: The case of Brcko district. Political Geography, 25, 203–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, S. N., & Sambanis, N. (2005). Bosnia’s Civil War: Origins and Violence Dynamics. In Paul Collier and Nicholas Sambanis (eds.), Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis, 2, 191–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1999). The interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian national identities: The role of the other in existential conflicts. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 581–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Whitehead, L. A. (1980). Procedural justice viewed in the context of justice motive theory. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 219–256). Bern, Austria: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, G., Hodson, R., & Sekulic, D. (1999). Ethnic enclaves and intolerance: The case of Yugoslavia. Social Forces, 78(2), 669–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, H., & Schaar, J. H. (1965). Psychological dimensions of anomy. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005). Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. American Economic Review, 95, 796–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, D., & Passini, S. (2009). Constructive and destructive aspects of heterogeneity in BosniaHerzegovina, paper presented at the 5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam, 10–12 September 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: an introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. (2008). “Not so much as place to lay our head…”: Moral inclusion and exclusion in the American civil war reconstruction. Social Justice Research, 21(1), 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S., Gerson, J., & Woodside, S. (2005). From moral exclusion to moral inclusion: theory for teaching peace. Theory into Practice, 44, 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passini, S. (2010). Moral reasoning in a multicultural society: Moral inclusion and moral exclusion. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passini, S., & Morselli, D. (2009). Authority relationships between obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(1), 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 93–114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynal-Querol, M. (2002). Ethnicity, political systems, and civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46, 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ringdal, G. I., Ringdal, K., & Simkus, A. (2008). War experiences and war-related distress in Bosnia and Herzegovina eight years after war. Croatian Medical Journal, 49, 75–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. M., Engelstoft, S., & Pobric, A. (2001). Remaking Sarajevo: Bosnian nationalism after the Dayton accord. Political Geography, 20, 957–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, M. (2004). Bosnie-Herzegovine 2003–2004. L’Union europeenne, horizon lointain. Le Courrier des Pays de l’Est, 1044, 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., & Coenders, M. (2002). Ethnic exclusion in European countries. Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 18, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, M. (1991). Alienation and anomie. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 291–371). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, M. E. (1983). Alienation, dogmatism, and related personality characteristics. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(1), 80–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srole, L. (1956). Social integration and certain corollaries: An exploratory study. American Sociological Review, 21(6), 709–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origin of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., & Renfro, C. L. (2003). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions. Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–207). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Clarement symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. L., & Hudson, M. C. (1972). World handbook of political and social indicators. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhanen, T. (Ed.). (1999). Ethnic conflicts explained by ethnic nepotism. Stamford, CT: Jai Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Morselli Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morselli, D., Passini, S. (2014). Beyond Ethnic Intolerance: Traces and Benefits of Ethnic Diversity in Post-War Bosnia-Herzegovina. In: Spini, D., Elcheroth, G., Corkalo Biruski, D. (eds) War, Community, and Social Change. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 17. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7491-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics