Skip to main content

Open Urologic Procedures: Radical Cystectomy with Diversion, Radical Prostatectomy, and Radical Nephrectomy Anesthetic Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1537 Accesses

Abstract

While recent advances in technology and training have allowed for increasing use of laparoscopic and robotic techniques in common urologic surgery, the open approach remains relevant in the context of complex urologic surgery performed for malignant disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2008, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, November 2010 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller D, Saigal C, Litwin M. The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America. Urol Clin N Am. 2009;36:11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gore J, Saigal C, Hanley J, et al. Variations in reconstruction after radical cystectomy. Cancer. 2006;107(4):729–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leidberg F. Early complications and morbidity of radical cystectomy. Eur Urol Suppl. 2010;9:25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quek L, Stein J, Daneshmand S, et al. A critical analysis of perioperative mortality from radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2006;175:886–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soulie M, Straub M, Game X, et al. A multicenter study of the morbidity of radical cystectomy in select elderly patients with bladder cancer. J Urol. 2002;167:1325–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knap N, Lundbeck F, Overguard J. Early and late treatment-related morbidity following radical cystectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39:153–60.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shahsigh A, Lorets R, Vora K, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol. 2009;55:164–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zippe C, Raina R, Shah A, et al. Female sexual dysfunction after radical cystectomy: a new outcome measure. Urology. 2004;63:1153–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bostrum P, Laato M, Nurmi M. Risk factors for mortality and morbidity related to radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2009;103:191–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:691–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maffezzini M, Campodonico F, Canepa G, et al. Current perioperative management of radical cystectomy with intestinal urinary reconstruction for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and reduction of the incidence of postoperative ileus. Surg Oncol. 2008;17:41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Aa F, Joniau S, Van Den Dranden M, et al. Metabolic changes after urinary diversion. Adv Urol 2011; Article ID 764325, p. 5. doi:10.1155/2011/764325.

  14. Gerges F. Anesthesia for laparascopy. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(1):67–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vallencian G, Guillonneau B, Fournier G, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical manual. Paris: Les Editions; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Awad H, Santilli S, Ohr M, et al. The effects of steep Trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):473–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu JC, Hevelone ND, Fierreira MD, et al. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the US from 2003 to 2005. J Urol. 2008;180(5):1969–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Barry MJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs. open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1557–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schaeffer E, Loeb S, Walsh P, et al. The case for open radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin N Am. 2010;37:49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, et al. Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007;99(6):1461–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naïve centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009;104(7):991–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klein H, McCurdy P, Nemo G, et al. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Expert Panel: transfusion alert: use of autologous blood. Transfusion 1995;35:703, Citation.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goldman M. Declining value of preoperative autologous donation. Transfusion. 2002;42(7):819–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Etachason J, Petz L, Keeler E, et al. The cost-effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donations. New Engl J Med. 1995;332:719. Abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Terai A. Use of acute normovolemic hemodilution in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2005;65(6):1152–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boldt J, Mailer K, Papsdorf M, et al. Acute normovolemic hemodilution vs controlled hypotension for reducing allogenic blood in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:170. Abstract.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maclvor D. Impact of intraoperative red blood cell salvage on transfusion requirements and outcomes in radical prostatectomy. Transfusion. 2009;49(7):1431–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nieder AM, Carmack AJ, Sved PD, et al. Intraoperative cell salvage during radical prostatectomy is not associated with greater biochemical recurrence rate. Urology. 2005;65:730–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nieder AM, Manoharan M, Yang Y, et al. Intraoperative cell salvage during radical cystectomy does not affect long-term survival. Urology. 2007;69:881–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gray CL, Amling CL, Polston GR, et al. Intraoperative cell salvage in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2001;58:740–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Davis M, Sofer M, Gomez-Marin O, et al. The use of cell salvage during radical prostatectomy: does it influence cancer recurrence? BJU Int. 2003;91:474–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Carvalhal GF, Griffin CR, Kan D, et al. Reducing blood loss in open radical retropubic prostatectomy with prophylactic periprostatic sutures. BJU Int. 2010;105(12):1650–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Forrest J, Chairman J, Clemens JQ, et al. AUA best practice statement for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing urologic surgery. J Urol. 2009;181:1170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nicolaides A, Breddin H, Fareed J, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. International consensus statement. J Vasc Biol. 2002;1:133.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey Jr DE, et al. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. Circulation. 2007;115:813–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tikuisis R. Epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia in radical prostatectomy. Medicina. 2009;45(10):772–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Salonia A, Crescenti A, Suardi N, et al. General versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, randomized study. Urology. 2004;64(1):95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Connor P. Induced hypotension with epidural/general anesthesia reduces transfusion in radical prostate surgery. Can J Anesth. 2006;53(9):873–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hong J. Epidural ropivacaine and sufentanil and the perioperative stress response after a radical retropubic prostatectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55(3):282–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Torossian A. Thermal management during anaesthesia and thermoregulation standards for the prevention of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesth. 2008;22(4):659–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Panossian C. The intraoperative use of warming blankets in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy is related with a reduction in post-anesthetic recovery time. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2008;58(3):220–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gottschalk A, Smith D, Jobes D, et al. Preemptive epidural analgesia and recovery from radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;279:1076–82. Abstract.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ashburn M, Caplan R, Carr D, et al. American Society of Anesthesiologist Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologist Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:1573–81.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kay G, Campbell R, Bukala B, et al. The role of ketorolac tromethamine in a clinical care pathway for men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Nurs. 2004;63:392–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ben-David B, Swanson J, Nelson J. Multimodal analgesia for radical prostatectomy provides better analgesia and shortens hospital stay. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19(4):264–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Brown D, Hofer R, Patterson D. Intrathecal anesthesia and recovery from radical prostatectomy. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(4):926–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Andrieu G. The efficacy of intrathecal morphine with or without clonidine for postoperative analgesia after radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(6):1954–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Biki B, Mascha E, Moriarty D, et al. Anesthetic technique for radical prostatectomy surgery affects cancer recurrence. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:180–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wuethrich P, Hsu Schmitz S, Kessler T, et al. Potential influence of the anesthetic technique used during open radical prostatectomy on prostate cancer-related outcome: a retrospective study. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(3):570–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Herberman R, Ortaldo J. Natural killer cells: their roles in defenses against disease. Science. 1981;214:24–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sacerdote P, Biachi M, Gaspani L, et al. The effects of tramadol and morphine on immune responses and pain after surgery in cancer patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1411–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Brand J, Kirchner H, Poppe C, et al. The effects of general anesthesia on human immune cell distribution and cytokine production. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1997;83:190–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gupta K, Kshirsagar S, Chang L, et al. Morphine stimulates angiogenesis by activating proangiogenic and survival-promoting signaling and promotes breast tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4491–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Akhavan A, Gainsburg D, Stock J. Complications associated with patient positioning in urologic surgery. Urology. 2010;76(6):1309–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ali H, Nieto J, Rhamy RK, et al. Acute renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis associated with extreme lithotomy position. Am J Kidney Dis. 1993;22:865. Abstract.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Bildsten SA, Dmochowski RR, Spindel MR, et al. The risk of rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure with the patient in the exaggerated lithotomy position. J Urol. 1994;152:1970–2. Abstract.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2011. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2011. Last accessed 27 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Nguyen C, Campbell S, Novick A. Choice of operation for clinically localized renal tumor. Urol Clin N Am. 2008;35:645–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lam J, Shvarts O, Pantuck A. Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2004;45:692–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Shalev M, Cipolla B, Guille F, et al. Is ipsilateral adrenalectomy a necessary component of radical nephrectomy? J Urol. 1995;152:1415.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lau W, Blute M, Weaver A, et al. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1236–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Uzzo R, Novick A. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2001;166:6–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ghavamian R, Zincke H. Nephron sparing surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2001;2:34–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Chan D, Cadeddu J, Jarrett T, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2001;166:2095–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Gill I, Kavoussi L, Lane B, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178:41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Harris PC, Torres VE. Polycystic kidney disease. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:321–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Sulikowski T, Tejchman K, Zietek Z. Experience with autosomal polycystic kidney disease in patients before and after renal transplantation: a 7-year observation. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(1):177–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Kramer A, Sausville J, Haririan A, et al. Simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy and living donor renal transplantation are successful for polycystic kidney disease: the University of Maryland experience. J Urol. 2009;181(2):724–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Cornelis F, Couzi L, Le Bras Y, et al. Embolization of polycystic kidneys as an alternative to nephrectomy before renal transplantation: a pilot study. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(10):2363–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Garnick MB. Bladder, renal, and testicular cancer. In: Dale DC, Federman DD, editors. Scientific American medicine. New York: Scientific American; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sukegawa I. Rhabdomyolysis after nephrectomy in the lateral flexed decubitus position. Masui. 2003;52(8):882–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Li Y. Combined general/epidural anesthesia (ropivacaine 0.375%) versus general anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(5):1562–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Marshall FF, Reitz BA. In: Marshall FF, editor. Textbook of operative urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Kabutan K, Taniguchi M. Anesthetic management of radical nephrectomy using cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with vena caval or atrial extension of renal cell carcinoma. Anesthesiology. 2005;54(8):881–3. Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hasnain JU, Watson RJN. Transesophageal echocardiography during resection of renal cell carcinoma involving the inferior vena cava. South Med J. 1994;87:273–5. Abstract.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Mizoguchi T, Koide Y, Ohara M, et al. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic guidance during resection of renal cell carcinoma extending in the inferior vena cava. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:1102–5. Abstract.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Ohara J, Sprung J, Whalley D, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography in monitoring of intrapulmonary embolism during inferior vena cava tumor resection. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13:69–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wagener G, Brentjens T. Anesthetic concerns inpatients presenting with renal failure. Anesth Clin. 2010;28:39–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Berrigan M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berrigan, M.J., Sherman, M.L. (2014). Open Urologic Procedures: Radical Cystectomy with Diversion, Radical Prostatectomy, and Radical Nephrectomy Anesthetic Considerations. In: Gainsburg, D., Bryson, E., Frost, E. (eds) Anesthesia for Urologic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7363-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7363-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7362-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7363-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics