Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy and Ablative Procedures for Small Renal Masses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Renal Cancer

Abstract

Partial nephrectomy is the standard technique for treatment of small renal masses (SRMs) ≤4 cm (Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. American Urological Association Research and Education; 2009). Minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic assisted) partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is gaining momentum. Studies have demonstrated similar oncologic and functional outcomes between open and MIPN (Lane BR, Gill IS. 7-Year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol. Elsevier Inc. 2010; 183(2):473–9.). The clinical benefits of laparoscopy in renal surgery, including shorter hospital time, faster convalescence, and reduced narcotic pain medication requirements postoperatively, make MIPN an attractive option in patients with SRMs (Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, Heidorn C, McDougall EM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol. 2000; 164(4):1153–9, Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR Jr., et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007; 178(1):41–6). In this chapter, we describe the techniques for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) and postoperative management and provide an overview of intra- and postoperative complications. A contemporary review of minimally invasive ablative therapies, including cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guideline for Management of the Clinical Stage 1 Renal Mass. American Urological Association Research and Education. 2009. http://www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and-quality-care/clinical-guidelines/main-reports/renalmass09.pdf

  2. Lane BR, Gill IS. 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2010;183(2):473–9. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, Heidorn C, McDougall EM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol. 2000;164(4):1153–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo Jr JR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178(1):41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kane CJ, Mallin K, Ritchey J, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR. Renal cell cancer stage migration. Cancer. 2008;113(1):78–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gautam G, Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Zorn KC. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: current perspectives and future prospects. Urology. 2009;74(4):735–40. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T, Touijer KA, Dalbagni G, Russo P, et al. Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4–7 cm. Eur Urol. 2012;61(3):593–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muto G, Castelli E, Migliari R, D’Urso L, Coppola P, Collura D. Laparoscopic microwave ablation and enucleation of small renal masses: preliminary experience. Eur Urol. 2011;60(1):173–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritchie RW, Leslie TA, Turner GDH, Roberts ISD, D’Urso L, Collura D, et al. Laparoscopic high-intensity focused ultrasound for renal tumours: a proof of concept study. BJU Int. 2010;107(8):1290–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;59(4):543–52. European Association of Urology.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year follow-up. J Urol. 2000;163(2):442–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson RH, Siddiqui S, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Russo P, Blute ML. Partial versus radical nephrectomy for 4 to 7 cm renal cortical tumors. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2601–6. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, Jang TL, Russo P. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors—is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol. 2009;181(1):55–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Steinberg A, Mascha E, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol. 2003;170(1):64–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu C-Y. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haber G-P, Lee MC, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Gill IS. Tumour in solitary kidney: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation. BJU Int. 2011;109(1):118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gong EM, Orvieto MA, Zorn KC, Lucioni A, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy in clinical T 1aRenal tumors. J Endourol. 2008;22(5):953–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Dulabon LM, Patel MN, Lipkin M, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2009;182(3):866–73. American Urological Association.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaouk JH, Khalifeh A, Hillyer S, Haber G-P, Stein RJ, Autorino R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):553–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mullins JK, Feng T, Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Hyams ES, Allaf ME. Comparative analysis of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy techniques in the treatment of localized renal tumors. Urology. 2012;80(2):316–22. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lane BR, Novick AC, Babineau D, Fergany AF, Kaouk JH, Gill IS. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney. J Urol. 2008;179(3):847–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH. The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fugita OEH, Chan DY, Roberts WW, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations. Urology. 2004;63(2):247–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Doublet J, Belair G. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is safe and effective in obese patients: a comparative study of 55 procedures. Urology. 2000; 56(1):63–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Whelan RL, Fleshman JW, Fowler DL. The SAGES manual of perioperative care in minimally invasive surgery. Chapter 35 Pulmonary implications of CO2 pneumoperitoneum in minimally invasive surgery. 2005:360–5. Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harris SN, Ballantyne GH, Luther MA, Perrino AC. Alterations of cardiovascular performance during laparoscopic colectomy: a combined hemodynamic and echocardiographic analysis. Anesth Analg. 1996; 83(3):482–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for ­quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182(3):844–53. American Urological Association.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bove P, Bhayani SB, Rha K-H, Allaf ME, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Necessity of ureteral catheter during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004;172(2): 458–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Glassman DT, Merriam WG, Trabulsi EJ, Byrne D, Gomella L. Rhabdomyolysis after laparoscopic nephrectomy. JSLS. 2007;11(4):432–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reisiger KE, Landman J, Kibel A, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic renal surgery and the risk of rhabdomyolysis: diagnosis and treatment. Urology. 2005;66(5): 29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Szabó I, László A. Veres needle: in memoriam of the 100th birthday anniversary of Dr János Veres, the inventor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:352–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gill IS, Delworth MG, Munch LC. Laparoscopic ­retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 1994;152 (5 Pt 1):1539–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ng C, Gill IS, Ramani AP, Steinberg A, Spaliviero M, Abreu SC, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2005;174(3): 846–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kavoussi LR, Schwartz MJ, Gill IS. Laparoscopic surgery of the kidney. Tenth Edition. In: Campbell-walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2012. p. 1628–1669. e7: chap 55.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hyams ES, Perlmutter M, Stifelman MD. A prospective evaluation of the utility of laparoscopic doppler technology during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2011;77(3):617–20. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramani AP, Abreu SC, Desai MM, Steinberg A, Ng C, Lin C-H, et al. Laparoscopic upper pole partial nephrectomy with concomitant en bloc adrenalectomy. Urology. 2003;62(2):223–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ljungberg BR, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol. 2010;58(3):398–406. European Association of Urology.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Capitanio U, Jeldres C, Patard J-J, Perrotte P, Zini L, de La Taille A, et al. Stage-specific effect of nodal metastases on survival in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2009;103(1):33–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC, Omar MI, Lam TBL, Hilvano-Cabungcal AM, et al. Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;27:1–21. European Association of Urology.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Blom JHM, van Poppel H, Maréchal JM, Jacqmin D, Schröder FH, de Prijck L, et al. Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase 3 trial 30881. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):28–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. van Poppel H. Lymph node dissection is not obsolete in clinically node-negative renal cell carcinoma patients. Eur Urol. 2011;59(1):24–5. European Association of Urology.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gong EM, Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Lucioni A, Msezane LP, Shalhav AL. Artery-only occlusion may provide superior renal preservation during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2008;72(4):843–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Marley CS, Siegrist T, Kurta J, O’Brien F, Bernstein M, Solomon S, et al. Cold intravascular organ perfusion for renal hypothermia during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2011;185(6):2191–5. American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Landman J, Venkatesh R, Lee D, Vanlangendonck R, Morissey K, Andriole GL, et al. Renal hypothermia achieved by retrograde endoscopic cold saline perfusion: technique and initial clinical application. Urology. 2003;61(5):1023–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gill IS, Abreu SC, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, Ramani AP, Ng C, et al. Laparoscopic Ice slush renal hypothermia for partial nephrectomy: the initial experience. J Urol. 2003;170(1):52–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nguyen MM, Gill IS. Halving ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;179(2): 627–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Guillonneau B, Bermúdez H, Gholami S, Fettouh El H, Gupta R, Adorno Rosa J, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: single center experience comparing clamping and no clamping techniques of the renal vasculature. J Urol. 2003; 169(2):483–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, Herati AS, Srinivasan AK, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR. Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage. BJU Int. 2012; 109(9):1376–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gill IS, Patil MB, de Castro Abreu AL, Ng C, Cai J, Berger A, et al. Zero ischemia anatomical partial nephrectomy: a novel approach. J Urol. 2012;187(3): 807–15. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB. Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol. 2002;167(1):61–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P, Jeschke K, Kirkali Z, Knüchel R, et al. Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2012;61(4): 757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Eggener SE, Pettus JA, Kwon ED, et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol. 2008;179(6):2158–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N, Thuret R, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2010;57(3):466–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kubinski DJ, Clark PE, Assimos DG, Hall MC. Utility of frozen section analysis of resection margins during partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2004;64(1):31–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Duvdevani M, Laufer M, Kastin A, Mor Y, Nadu A, Hanani J, et al. Is frozen section analysis in nephron sparing surgery necessary? A clinicopathological study of 301 cases. J Urol. 2005;173(2):385–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Timsit M-O, Bazin J-P, Thiounn N, Fontaine E, Chrétien Y, Dufour B, et al. Prospective study of safety margins in partial nephrectomy: intraoperative assessment and contribution of frozen section analysis. Urology. 2006;67(5):923–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bylund JR, Clark CJ, Crispen PL, LaGrange CA, Strup SE. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without formal collecting system closure: perioperative outcomes in 104 consecutive patients. J Endourol. 2011;25(12):1853–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tsivian A, Tsivian M, Benjamin S, Sidi AA. Simplified hemostatic technique during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38(1):84–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, Haber G-P, Chlosta PL, Somani BK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2012. European Association of Urology. Jul. 4: forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, Stricker H, Peabody J, Littleton R, et al. Da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-Up. Eur Urol. 2007;51(1):186–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gupta GN, Boris R, Chung P, Linehan WM, Pinto PA, Bratslavsky G. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 4 cm and high nephrometry score: feasibility, renal functional, and oncological outcomes with minimum 1 year follow-up. Urol Oncol. 2011;31:51–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kyllo RL, Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH, Stifelman MD, Rogers CG, Hillyer SP, et al. Prospective multi-center study of oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for pT1 renal cell carcinoma. BMC Urol. 2012;12(1):1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Delong JM, Shapiro O, Moinzadeh A. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon’s initial experience. Can J Urol. 2010;17(3):5207–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Humphrey JE, Canes D. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology. Int J Urol. 2012;19(5):416–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Yakoubi R, Rha KH, Stein RJ, White WM, et al. Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery: multi-institutional analysis of risk factors for conversion and postoperative complications. J Urol. 2012;187(6):1989–94. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Laydner H, Hillyer S, Yakoubi R, Isac W, et al. Robotic single-site kidney surgery: evaluation of second-generation instruments in a cadaver model. Urology. 2012;79(5):975–9. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Boylu U, Oommen M, Joshi V, Thomas R, Lee BR. Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) partial nephrectomy in a porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2009;24(2):485–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Haber G-P, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Berger A, Aron M, Goel R, et al. Robotic NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience. Urology. 2008; 71(6):996–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Shah K, Abaza R. Clinical pathway for discharge on postoperative day one after robotic partial nephrectomy. [moderated poster] In: American Urological Association annual meeting. Washington, DC; 2011 May 14–19; May 30.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Varkarakis IM, Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Inagaki T, Su LM, Kavoussi LR, et al. Pancreatic injuries during laparoscopic urologic surgery. Urology. 2004;64(6): 1089–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Aron M, Colombo Jr JR, Turna B, Stein RJ, Haber G-P, Gill IS. Diaphragmatic repair and/or reconstruction during upper abdominal urological laparoscopy. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2444–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zorn KC, Gong EM, Orvieto MA, Gofrit ON, Mikhail AA, Shalhav AL. Impact of collecting-system repair during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2007;21(3):315–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Autorino R, Kaouk JH. Cryoablation for small renal tumors: current status and future perspectives. Urol Oncol. 2012;30(S):S20–7. Elsevier Inc.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Donnally C, Trimmer CK, Cadeddu JA. Durable oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation. Cancer. 2010;116(13): 3135–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lian H, Guo H, Zhang G, Yang R, Gan W, Li X, et al. Single-center comparison of complications in laparoscopic and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with ultrasound guidance for renal tumors. Urology. 2012;80(1):119–25. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Long CJ, Kutikov A, Canter DJ, Egleston BL, Chen DYT, Viterbo R, et al. Percutaneous vs surgical cryoablation of the small renal mass: is efficacy compromised? BJU Int. 2010;107(9):1376–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Goyal J, Verma P, Sidana A, Georgiades CS, Rodriguez R. Single-center comparative oncologic outcomes of surgical and percutaneous cryoablation for ­treatment of renal tumors. J Endourol. 2012 May 29;:120529144615009.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Aron M, Kamoi K, Remer E, Berger A, Desai M, Gill I. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: 8-year, single ­surgeon outcomes. J Urol. 2010;183(3):889–95. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor. Urology. 2005;66(5):23–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. O’Malley RL, Berger AD, Kanofsky JA, Phillips CK, Stifelman M, Taneja SS. A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses. BJU Int. 2007;99(2):395–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Haramis G, Graversen JA, Mues AC, Korets R, Rosales JC, Okhunov Z, et al. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small. J Laparoendosc Surg. 2012;22(2):152–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Guillotreau J, Haber G-P, Autorino R, Miocinovic R, Hillyer S, Hernandez A, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass. Eur Urol. 2012;61(5):899–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ji C, Li X, Zhang S, Gan W, Zhang G, Zeng L, et al. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: 32-month mean follow-up results of 106 patients. Urology. 2011;77(4):798–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Zagoria RJ, Pettus JA, Rogers M, Werle DM, Childs D, Leyendecker JR. Long-term outcomes after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2011;77(6):1393–7. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Kunkle DAD, Uzzo RGR. Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass: a meta-analysis. Cancer. 2008;113(10):2671–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Ritchie RW, Leslie T, Phillips R, Wu F, Illing R, Haar Ter G, et al. Extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound for renal tumours: a 3-year follow-up. BJU Int. 2010;106(7):1004–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Castle SM, Salas N, Leveillee RJ. Initial experience using microwave ablation therapy for renal tumor treatment: 18-month follow-up. Urology. 2011;77(4): 792–7. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Simone G, Papalia R, Guaglianone S, Carpanese L, Gallucci M. Zero ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after superselective transarterial tumor embolization for tumors with moderate nephrometry score: long-term results of a single-center experience. J Endourol. 2011;25(9):1443–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Moinzadeh AA, Flacke SS, Libertino JAJ, Merhige JJ, Vogel J-MJ, Lyall KK, et al. Temporary segmental renal artery occlusion using reverse phase polymer for bloodless robotic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2009; 182(4):1582–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Harty NJ, Laskey DH, Moinzadeh A, Flacke S, Benn JA, Villani R, et al. Temporary targeted renal blood flow interruption using a reverse thermosensitive polymer to facilitate bloodless partial nephrectomy: a swine survival study. BJU Int. 2012;110(6b): E274–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, Kerbl K, Stone AM, Wick MR, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model. J Urol. 1993;149(6): 1633–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Moinzadeh M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kowalik, C.G., Canes, D., Moinzadeh, A. (2013). Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy and Ablative Procedures for Small Renal Masses. In: Libertino, J. (eds) Renal Cancer. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7236-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7236-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7235-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7236-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics