Skip to main content

IUI Is a Valuable and Cost-Effective Therapy for Most Couples

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biennial Review of Infertility

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness of IUI has been addressed in only few randomized controlled trials. These trials are difficult to compare because they differ in patient characteristics, included costs, and treatment strategies. Despite these differences, current evidence shows that expectant management is the first-line treatment option in couples with a favorable prognosis for natural conception. Follow-up treatment with IUI is more cost-effective than immediate IVF. The duration of treatment with IUI before proceeding to IVF and the additional value of ovarian stimulation are unclear. An important omission in the present studies is the lack of including the costs caused by multiple gestations and the prognostic profile of the included couples. A study is currently being performed in couples with a poor prognosis for natural conception with mild male or unexplained infertility. This study compares six cycles of IUI, three cycles of IVF eSET, or six cycles of modified natural cycle IVF. This study may give the final answer about which strategy is the most cost-effective strategy for couples after expectant management failed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Van Voorhis BJ, Sparks AE, Allen BD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of infertility treatments: a cohort study. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):830–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. NCCWCH. Clinical Guideline 11. Fertility: assessment and treatment for peole with fertility problems. 2004. http://www.nice.org.uk.

  3. RCOG. The management of infertility in secondary care. 1998. http://www.rcog.org.uk.

  4. Quaas A, Dokras A. Diagnosis and treatment of unexplained infertility. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Spring;1(2):69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hunault CC, Habbema JD, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2019–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Hompes PG, et al. Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9531):216–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Custers IM, van Rumste MM, van der Steeg JW, et al. Long-term outcome in couples with unexplained ­subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2): 444–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reindollar RH, Regan MM, Neumann PJ, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(3): 888–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karande VC, Korn A, Morris R, et al. Prospective ­randomized trial comparing the outcome and cost of in vitro fertilization with that of a traditional ­treatment algorithm as first-line therapy for couples with infertility. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(3):468–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, et al. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2000;355(9197):13–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Custers IM, Konig TE, Broekmans FJ, et al. Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5):1107–11.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bensdorp AJ, Slappendel E, Koks C, et al. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lobke M. Moolenaar M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moolenaar, L.M., Van Voorhis, B.J., van der Veen, F. (2013). IUI Is a Valuable and Cost-Effective Therapy for Most Couples. In: Schlegel, P., Fauser, B., Carrell, D., Racowsky, C. (eds) Biennial Review of Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7187-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7187-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7186-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7187-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics