Abstract
Reproductive tourism is variably defined as the provision of infertility treatment for a patient outside of the borders of the patient’s native country. Since such treatment often occurs because of legal restrictions on medical care available in the patients’ native country, it is important to examine the ethical and legal considerations that result in limitations on the provision of health care in the field of reproductive medicine as well as the magnitude and effects of such medical treatment.
Keywords
- Assist Reproductive Technology
- Preimplantion Genetic Diagnosis
- Medical Tourism
- Oocyte Donation
- Surrogate Mother
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pennings G. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(12): 2689–94.
Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, et al. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 15: cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(10):2182–4.
Pennings G. Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion. J Med Ethics. 2002;28(6):337–41.
Matorras R. Reproductive exile versus reproductive tourism. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(12):3571; author reply -2.
Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Rethinking reproductive “tourism” as reproductive “exile”. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(3):904–6.
Matorras R. Reply: reproductive exile versus reproductive tourism. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(12):3571.
Follow-up to the highlevel reflection process on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European Union. Brussels; 2004.
Rose H, Rose S. Playing God. The Guardian. 2003.
Pennings G, Autin C, Decleer W, et al. Cross-border reproductive care in Belgium. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12):3108–18.
Collins J, Cook J. Cross-border reproductive care: now and into the future. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):e25–6.
College of Physicians “Reproductive Medicine” and Belgain Register for Assisted Procreation (2001) Verslag 1998–1999.
McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, et al. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or ‘fertility tourism’ on NHS maternity services. BJOG. 2009;116(11):1520–3.
Parliament E. Resolution on the trade in human egg cells. Texts adopted, Thursday, 10 Mar 2005. Strasbourg; 2005.
HFEA. Re-register as an identifiable donor. 2012 [cited 2013 Feb 11]. Available from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/1973.html.
Eggs Donation Law. Sefer HaChukkim. 2010;5770(2242):520.
Shetty P. India’s unregulated surrogacy industry. Lancet. 2012;380(9854):1633–4.
James PT. The impact of medical tourism on Thai private hospital management: informing hospital policy. Glob J Health Sci. 2012;4(1):127–39.
Franklin S. Not a flat world: the future of cross-border reproductive care. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(7):814–6.
Deonandan R, Green S, van Beinum A. Ethical concerns for maternal surrogacy and reproductive tourism. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(12):742–5.
Shenfield F, Pennings G, De Mouzon J, et al. ESHRE’s good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1625–7.
Shenfield F. Implementing a good practice guide for CBRC: perspectives from the ESHRE Cross-Border Reproductive Care Taskforce. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(5):657–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ron-El, R. (2013). Reproductive Tourism. In: Schlegel, P., Fauser, B., Carrell, D., Racowsky, C. (eds) Biennial Review of Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7187-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7187-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7186-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7187-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)