Skip to main content

Introduction to Color Doppler Ultrasound of the Skin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

High-resolution gray scale and color Doppler ultrasound can be a useful tool in dermatology. Technical requirements and useful sonographic concepts are discussed in this chapter. An ultrasound glossary, tips and teaching points are provided to improve the understanding of this technique.

A comprehensive review of the basics of ultrasound focused on the ­requisites for skin, nail and scalp examinations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Merrit CRB. Physics of ultrasound. In: Rumack CM, editor. Diagnostic ultrasound. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p. 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wortsman X, Wortsman J. Clinical usefulness of variable-frequency ultrasound in localized lesions of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:247–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lassau N, Spatz A, Avril MF, et al. Value of high-frequency US for preoperative assessment of skin tumors. Radiographics. 1997;17:1559–651.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cammarota T, Pinto F, Magliaro A, Sarno A. Current uses of ­diagnostic high-frequency US in dermatology. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:215–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Szyman’ska E, Nowicki A, Mlosek K, et al. Skin imaging with high frequency ultrasound: preliminary results. Eur J Ultrasound. 2000;12:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerger A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Samonigg H, Smolle J. In vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy in the diagnosis of melanocytic skin tumors. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160:475–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, Nazaradeh F, Goehde SC, Barkhausen J, et al. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA. 2003;290:3199–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wortsman XC, Holm EA, Wulf HC, Jemec GBE. Real-time spatial compound ultrasound imaging of skin. Skin Res Technol. 2004;10:23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weng L, Tirumalai AP, Lowery CM, et al. US extended-field-of-view imaging technology. Radiology. 1997;203:877–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hildegard Schmid-Wendtner M, Burgdorf W. Ultrasound scanning in dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 2005;14:217–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Soto R, et al. Benign tumors and pseudotumors of the nail: a novel application of sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:803–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gutierrez M, Wortsman X, Filippucci E, et al. High-frequency sonography in the evaluation of psoriasis: nail and skin involvement. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1569–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giovagnorio F, Valentini C, Paonessa A. High-resolution and color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of skin metastases. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:1017–22, quiz 1023–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giovagnorio F, Andreoli C, De Cicco ML. Color Doppler sonography of focal lesions of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18:89–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schroder RJ, Maurer J, Zlowodski M, et al. Vascularization of malignant and benign skin tumors measured by D-galactose-based signal enhanced colour Doppler sonography. Acta Radiol. 2001;42:294–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burns PN. Physics of ultrasound. In: Rumack CM, editor. Diagnostic ultrasound. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p. 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Foster FS, Mehi J, Lukacs M, et al. A new 15–50 MHz array-based micro-ultrasound scanner for preclinical imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1700–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Foster FS, Hossack J, Lee Adamson S. Micro-ultrasound for preclinical imaging. Interface Focus. 2011;1:576–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Edith Suss-Toby, Ph.D. and Michal Schlesinger-Lau, VMD, Imaging & Microscopy Unit, Multidisciplinary Laboratories, Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, for the images on micro-ultrasound for preclinical imaging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Gaitini MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Glossary

Transducer

Device that converts one form of energy into another. In ultrasound, the transducer converts electric energy provided by the transmitter to mechanical energy (acoustic pulses) and vice versa, reflected echoes to electric signals. Ultrasound transducers are made of thin piezoelectric materials that expand and contract to generate acoustic vibrations (frequencies).

Resolution

Capacity to separate two objects in close proximity that are along the path of the ultrasound beam. Axial resolution is the smallest thickness while lateral resolution is the smallest width that can be resolved. Higher ultrasound frequencies raise the spatial resolution but lower the depth of penetration into the tissues.

Artifacts

Source of imaging pitfalls, suggesting the presence of structures that are not actually present or obscuring real findings. Examples of artifacts suggesting structures that are not actually present are reverberation, refraction, and side lobes artifacts. Reverberation artifacts are a result of repeated reflection of the ultrasound signal between highly reflective interfaces usually near the transducer. Refraction artifacts are a result of bending of the sound beam causing targets that are not situated along the axis of the transducer to appear in a misleading location. Side lobes artifacts result from a strong out-of-plane reflector, generating confusing echoes. An example of artifact-obscuring findings is posterior acoustic shadowing. Acoustic shadow is a result of total reflection of the ultrasound waves by a strong reflector, causing loss of information on the tissues deep to the reflecting structure.

Harmonics

Multiples or harmonic echoes of the transmitted fundamental frequency generated by the acoustic pulse as it travels within tissues.

Compounding

Image resulting from summing ultrasound images obtained from different scanning angles.

Extended field of view (EFOV)

Panoramic image ­generated by manual movement of a real-time probe in the direction of the transducer array. Imaging processing technology estimates translation and rotation of the probe by comparing successive images. The EFOV image buffer combines the images to produce a panoramic image.

3D Ultrasound

Tissue volume acquired by dedicated 3D transducers employing hardware-based image registration, high density 2D arrays or software registration of scan planes.

Hypoechoic

Reflected signals (echoes) of intermediate intensity or amplitude, generating images of low brightness in different shades of gray. Examples of hypoechoic tissues are the parenchymal organs such as the liver, spleen, renal parenchyma, and muscles.

Hyperechoic

Reflected signals (echoes) of high intensity or amplitude, generating images of high brightness (white). Examples of hyperechoic tissues are fat, fibrous tissues, and bones. Foreign bodies and stones are examples of hyperechoic structures.

Echofree, sonolucent, or anechoic

Absence of reflected signals (echoes), generating images in black. Examples of anechoic targets are normal vessels, gallbladder, urinary bladder, and cysts.

Doppler effect

The result of the change in frequency of the sound when scattered by a moving target. The Doppler frequency shift is described by the Doppler equation: \( \Delta F=\left(\text{FR}-\text{FT}\right)=(2\ \text{FT}\ \text v/c)\mathrm{cos}\theta.\)

ΔF: Doppler frequency shift

FR: frequency of sound reflected from the moving target

FT: frequency of sound emitted from the transducer

v; target velocity

c: sound velocity in the medium

θ: angle between the flow axis and the incident ultrasound beam (angle of insonation). This angle must be kept at 60° or less.

Pulsatility index (PI)

PI considers the tissue resistance to flow at each complete cardiac cycle. It is calculated as PI = PSV  −  EDV/mean velocity.

Resistive index (RI)

RI considers the tissue resistance to blood flow at systole and diastole. It is calculated as RI = PSV  −  EDV/PSV

Contrast enhanced ultrasound agents (CEUS)

Intravascular blood-pool agents comprised of encapsulated microbubbles of gas, smaller than red blood cells, capable of circulating freely. CEUS seek to enhance the echo amplitude by increasing the backscatter from moving red cells, while increasing attenuation from the static tissue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaitini, D. (2013). Introduction to Color Doppler Ultrasound of the Skin. In: Wortsman, X. (eds) Dermatologic Ultrasound with Clinical and Histologic Correlations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7184-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7184-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7183-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7184-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics