Abstract
In February of 2010, the federal Office of Sustainable Communities selected five pilot projects to serve as exemplars of the United States’ new sustainable urban policy. One of the pilots, the expansion of the Fairmount commuter rail line in Boston, integrates social needs and environmental benefits within a coordinated strategy of community development. In this chapter, I detail the case of the Fairmount line in Boston. First, I discuss the process of collaboration between grassroots social policy and environmental policy advocates. Through an effective framing of the problems facing inner-city residents, disparate advocacy groups joined forces to advocate for a single policy outcome, seeing the transit expansion as simultaneously socially and environmentally beneficial. But the Fairmount case also involved a political evolution from above: Local and regional policymakers reimagined the initial social policy as an environmental policy, ultimately recognizing the interdependent social and environmental benefits of transit expansion. Sustainable policy development requires integrated partnerships, and I conclude with lessons for policymakers and practitioners alike.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See Grogan and Proscio (2001) for more on the history of community development corporations.
- 2.
While Hyde Park was not scheduled to receive a new station along the Fairmount line, SWBCDC was included in the partnership because the southernmost station falls within the group’s service area.
- 3.
It is important to note that CLF’s involvement in the Fairmount Coalition emerged irrespective of their lawsuit against the state. In fact, they did not lobby for the Fairmount project to take precedence over other transit investments. When CLF sued the state in 2006, Carrie Russell was working on transit issues for the Massachusetts office. Along with the rest of CLF, she was sympathetic to the Fairmount advocates’ claims of transit inequities yet questioned the ability of the Fairmount improvements to have a substantial environmental impact. But since the estimated reduction in carbon emissions from the Fairmount project satisfied the federal requirements, it supplanted CLF’s preferred transit investments. Moreover, the groundswell local consensus and support for the project—of which CLF was a contributing member—made the Fairmount expansion especially attractive to the state.
References
Altshuler AA, Luberoff D (2003) Mega projects: the changing politics of urban public investment. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
Boston Transportation Planning Review (1973) Final study summary report, February. State Transportation Library of Massachusetts, Boston
Cambanis, Thanassis. (2003, August 21). Activists Say Boston Transit List Ignores Minority Needs. The Boston Globe.
Gakenheimer R (1976) Transportation policy as response to controversy. MIT Press, Cambridge
Grogan P, Proscio T (2001) Comeback cities: a blueprint for urban neighborhood revival. Westview Press, Boulder
Gupta, Vineet. (2003, September 21). Vineet Gupta Transportation. The Boston Globe.
Hanchett, Doug. (2002, September 1). T jumps on Fairmount upgrade; $70M plan will add stops, stations. The Boston Globe.
Snow DA, Burke Rochford E Jr, Worden SK, Benford RD (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. Am Sociol Rev 51(4):464–481
The T’s Hush Hush Line. (1987, November 10). The Boston Globe.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levine, J.R. (2013). When Environmental and Social Policy Converge: The Case of Boston’s Fairmount Line. In: Wallimann, I. (eds) Environmental Policy is Social Policy – Social Policy is Environmental Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6723-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6723-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6722-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6723-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)