Skip to main content

The New Lung Cancer TNM Classification: Review and Clinical Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Interventions in Pulmonary Medicine

Abstract

Lung cancer remains the number one cause of cancer-related mortality in the Western world. Its staging is the cornerstone for both prognosis and treatment guidance. A unified and universally accepted staging system is also essential to standardize nomenclature for international comparisons of clinical trials. The UICC 7th edition of the TNM classification system is undoubtedly a major improvement in our scientific basis for the staging of lung cancer, supported by a large international database and subject to thorough internal and external validation process. Some limitations are deeply related to the retrospective nature of the data collection and will hopefully be overcome with the new prospective data set developed by the IASLC to inform changes to the eighth TNM. In this chapter, we will review the modifications to the T, N, and M descriptors, as well as the group stages, and we will discuss its clinical implications, strengths, and limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parkin DM, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lababede O, Meziane M, Rice T. Seventh edition of the cancer staging manual and stage grouping of lung cancer: quick reference chart and diagrams. Chest. 2011;139(1):183–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Denoix P. The TNM staging system. Bull Inst Nat Hyg. 1952;7:743.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carson J, Finley DJ. Lung cancer staging: an overview of the new staging system and implications for radiographic clinical staging. Semin Roentgenol. 2011; 46(3):187–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mountain CF, Carr DT, Anderson WA. A system for the clinical staging of lung cancer. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1974;120(1):130–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest. 1997;111(6):1710–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Tanoue LT. The new lung cancer staging system. Chest. 2009;136(1):260–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Groome PA, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(8):694–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Postmus PE, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the M descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007; 2(8):686–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rami-Porta R, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007; 2(7):593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rusch VW, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007; 2(7):603–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chansky K, et al. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project: prognostic factors and pathologic TNM stage in surgically managed non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4(7):792–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rusch VW, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009; 4(5):568–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Travis WD, et al. Visceral pleural invasion: pathologic criteria and use of elastic stains: proposal for the 7th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3(12):1384–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Travis WD, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the inclusion of broncho-pulmonary carcinoid tumors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3(11):1213–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vallieres E, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals regarding the relevance of TNM in the pathologic staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009; 4(9):1049–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldstraw P, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(8):706–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shepherd FA, et al. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer lung cancer staging project: proposals regarding the clinical staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the tumor, node, metastasis classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(12):1067–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. International Union Against Cancer. In: Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marshall H, et al. The science behind the 7th edition TNM staging system for lung cancer. Respirology. 2012;17(2):247–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (http://www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER Stat Database: Incidence SEER 13 regs Public-Use, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2005, based on November 2004 submission.

  22. The Japan lung cancer society classification of lung cancer. 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co.; 2000

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nair A, et al. Revisions to the TNM staging of non-small cell lung cancer: rationale, clinicoradiologic implications, and persistent limitations. Radiographics. 2011;31(1):215–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Detterbeck FC, et al. Details and difficulties regarding the new lung cancer staging system. Chest. 2010; 137(5):1172–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu PK, et al. Effect of formalin fixation on tumor size determination in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(6):1825–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ou SH, et al. Prognostic significance of the non-size-based AJCC T2 descriptors: visceral pleura invasion, hilar atelectasis, or obstructive pneumonitis in stage IB non-small cell lung cancer is dependent on tumor size. Chest. 2008;133(3):662–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsuboi M, et al. The present status of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;13(2):73–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Martini N, Melamed MR. Multiple primary lung cancers. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70(4): 606–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruffini E, et al. Recommended changes for T and N descriptors proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer - Lung Cancer Staging Project: a validation study from a single-centre ­experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36(6): 1037–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Detterbeck FC, et al. Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(3 Suppl): 202S–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lardinois D, et al. ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(5):787–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Silvestri GA, et al. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(3 Suppl):178S–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Tinteren H, et al. Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9315):1388–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lardinois D, et al. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(25):2500–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto F. Casal M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Casal, R.F., Morice, R.C. (2013). The New Lung Cancer TNM Classification: Review and Clinical Implications. In: Díaz-Jimenez, J., Rodriguez, A. (eds) Interventions in Pulmonary Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6009-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6009-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6008-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6009-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics