Abstract
In 2008, the European Parliament (EP) and the Council approved a new directive that sought to regulate and harmonise the standards of deportation. The Returns Directive raised criticisms from various fronts but it also confirmed the EP as a new actor in the field. Thanks to its new co-legislative powers, the EP became an active promoter of EU-wide policies seeking to remove irregular immigrants from the territory. Interestingly, before turning into a co-legislator the EP had led a sustained opposition to the security-biased policies formulated by the Council. Given the substantial shift in the position of the EP, the Returns Directive is a good example to examine the changes in the political dynamics after the introduction of new decision-making rules and their impact on the construction of a new EU framework for deportation practices.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
An earlier version of this chapter has been presented at the summer school on ‘Old and New Borders in Europe’, organised by the Centre Marc Bloch Europa (Berlin) and Universität Viadrina (Frankfurt/Oder) and at the ‘International Conference: Deportation and the Development of Citizenship’, organised by the University of Oxford. It has also been published as a Sussex European Institute Working Paper (n° 117). I wish to thank all participants and reviewers for their comments and advice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
To this date, the EU has concluded agreements with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Hong Kong, Macao, Montenegro, Moldova, Russia, Serbia, Sri Lanka, Ukraine and Pakistan. Negotiations with Turkey have finalised and there are ongoing talks with Morocco and Cape Verde (European Commission 2011).
- 2.
In fact, during negotiations (and in view of the expected outcome) some Member States amended their national legislation in order to increase the length of detention. For instance, Italy proposed to up the length of detention from 60 days to 18 months in June 2008 (Senato della Repubblica 2008).
- 3.
Council official, interview, January 2009; Weber, EPP-ED MEP, interview, December 2009.
- 4.
Weber, EPP-ED MEP, interview, December 2009, Lemarchal, S&D political advisor, interview, March 2010.
- 5.
Weber, EPP-ED MEP, interview, December 2009.
- 6.
Speiser, EPP political advisor, interview, January 2009; Weber, EPP-ED MEP, interview, December 2009; Hennis-Plasschaert, ALDE MEP, interview, March 2010.
- 7.
Speiser, EPP-ED political advisor, interview, January 2009.
- 8.
Speiser, EPP-ED political advisor, interview, January 2009; Weber, EPP-ED MEP, interview, December 2009; MEP assistant, interview, March 2010; Sidenius, Greens political advisor and GUE/NGL political advisor, interviews, March 2011; Commission official, interview, April 2011.
- 9.
Speiser, EPP-ED political advisor, interview, January 2009; Hennis-Plasschaert, ALDE MEP and MEP assistant, interviews, March 2010.
- 10.
Sidenius, Greens political advisor, interview, March 2011; Commission official, interview, April 2011.
- 11.
Sidenius, Greens political advisor; GUE/NGL political advisor, interviews, March 2011.
- 12.
Sidenius, Greens political advisor, interview, March 2011.
- 13.
Hennis-Plasschaert, ALDE MEP, interview, March 2010.
- 14.
Alvaro, ALDE MEP, interview, January 2009; Hennis-Plasschaert, ALDE MEP, interview, March 2010.
- 15.
Ibid.
References
Acosta, D. (2009). The good, the bad and the ugly in EU migration law: Is the European Parliament becoming bad and ugly? (The adoption of directive 2008/15: The Returns Directive). European Journal of Migration and Law, 11(1), 19–39.
Baldaccini, A. (2009). The return and removal of irregular migrants under EU law: An analysis of the Returns Directive. European Journal of Migration and Law, 11(1), 1–17.
Den Boer, M., & Monar, J. (2002). 11 September and the challenge of global terrorism to the EU as a security actor. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(s1), pp. 11–28.
Bouteillet-Paquet, D. (2003). Passing the buck: A critical analysis of the readmission policy implemented by the European Union and its Member States. European Journal of Migration and Law, 5, 359–377.
Canetta, E. (2007). The EU policy on return of illegally staying third-country nationals. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9(4), 435–450.
Costello, R. (2011). Does bicameralism promote stability? Inter-institutional relations and coalition formation in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 34(1), 122–144.
Council of the European Union (2001). Council Directive of 28 June 2001 supplementing the provisions of Article 26 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985.
Council of the European Union (2002). Proposal for a Return Action Programme, 14673/02.
Council of the European Union (2003). Council Directive of 25 November 2003 on assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air. 2003/110/EC, Official Journal, L 321/26.
Council of the European Union (2004a). Council Decision of 29 April 2004 on the organisation of joint flights for removals from the territory of two or more Member States, of third-country nationals who are subjects of individual removal orders. 2004/573/EC, Official Journal L 261/28.
Council of the European Union (2004b). Council Decision of 22 December 2004 providing for certain areas covered by Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community to be governed by the procedure laid down in Article 251 of that Treaty.
Council of the European Union (2009). The Stockholm Programme—An open and secure Europe serving and protecting the citizens, 17024/09. Retrieved March 18, 2010, from http://www.se2009.eu/polopoly_fs/1.26419!menu/standard/file/Klar_Stockholmsprogram.pdf
Elsen, C. (2010). Personal reflections on the institutional framework of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. In J. Monar (Ed.), The institutional dimension of the European Union’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (pp. 255–265). Brussels: Peter Lang.
European Commission (2002). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a community return policy on illegal residents, COM/2002/0564 final.
European Commission (2005). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, COM/2005/391 final.
European Commission (2011). EU readmission agreements: State of play. Retrieved April 12, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/policies/immigration/docs/EUreadmissionagreements.pdf
European Parliament (2008). Debates—Tuesday, 17 June 2008—Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, CRE 17/06/2008-4. Available from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+CRE+20080617+ITEM-004+DOC+XML+V0//EN
European Parliament (2009). Codecision and conciliation: A guide to how the parliament co-legislates under the Treaty of Lisbon. Retrieved March 18, 2010, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/code/information/guide_en.pdf
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2006). Regulation of 15 March 2006 establishing a community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code).
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2008). Directive of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, 2008/115/EC.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2009). Directive of 18 June 2009 providing for minimum standards on sanctions and measures against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals, 2009/52/EC.
European People’s Party (2009). EPP Group Report, Issue 10. Retrieved March 18, 2010, from http://www.eppgroup.eu/Press/psess09/report0911a.pdf
Fabbrini, S. (2005). Madison in Brussels: The EU and the US as compound democracies. European Political Science, 4, 188–198.
Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2003). Formal and informal institutions under codecision: Continuous constitution-building in Europe. Governance, 16(4), 577–600.
Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2004). Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision making: Early agreements under codecision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1184–1212.
Grabbe, H. (2002). Justice and Home Affairs: Faster decisions, secure rights. CER Policy Brief. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from http://www.cer.org.uk/pdf/policybrief_jha.pdf
Guild, E., & Carrera, S. (2005). No Constitutional Treaty? Implications for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. CEPS Working Document, 231. Retrieved March 18, 2010, from http://www.ceps.eu/book/no-constitutional-treaty-implications-area-freedom-security-and-justice
Guiraudon, V. (2000). European integration and migration policy: Vertical policy-making as venue shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 251–271.
Hausemer, P. (2006). Participation and political competition in committee report allocation: Under what conditions do MEPs represent their constituents? European Union Politics, 7(4), 505–530.
Hayes-Renshaw, F., & Wallace, H. (2006). The Council of Ministers (2nd ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hix, S. (2005). The political system of the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hix, S., & Noury, A. (2007). Politics, not economic interests: Determinants of migration policies in the European Union. International Migration Review, 41(1), 182–205.
Honzak, R. (2008). Return Directive—A test case for future decision making. Europolitics. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from http://www.europolitics.info/dossiers/return-directive/a-test-case-for-future-decision-making-art147379-70.html
Judge, D., & Earnshaw, D. (2011). ‘Relais actors’ and co-decision first reading agreements in the European Parliament: The case of the advanced therapies regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(1), 53–71.
Jupille, J. (2004). Procedural politics: Issues, influence, and institutional choice in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaunert, C. (2010). European internal security: Towards supranational governance in the area of freedom, Security and Justice, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Koesters, J., Lachenmaier, A., van Bergen, J., Wagner, N., Winter, M. & Wirtz, A. (2010). Who cares about Strasbourg? The role of the European Parliament in the PNR agreements. Maastricht European Studies Papers, 1(1). Retrieved September 25, 2010, from http://www.fdcw.unimaas.nl/mesp/Papers%20%282006%29/MESP_Koesters%20et%20al.%20_2010_.%20Role%20of%20EP%20in%20PNR%20Agreements_PUBLICATION.pdf
Kreppel, A., & Tsebelis, G. (1999). Coalition formation in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies, 32(8), 933–966.
Lavenex, S. (2006). Shifting up and out: The foreign policy of European immigration control. West European Politics, 29(2), 329–350.
Lavenex, S., & Uçarer, E. M. (2003). Migration and the externalities of European integration. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Lavenex, S., & Wichmann, N. (2009). The external governance of EU internal security. Journal of European Integration, 31(1), 83–102.
Luedtke, A. (2011). Uncovering European Union immigration legislation: Policy dynamics and outcomes. International Migration, 49(2), 1–27.
Lutterbeck, D. (2006). Policing migration in the Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, 11(1), 59–82.
McElroy, G. (2006). Committee representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 7(1), 5–29.
Melis, B. (2001). Negotiating Europe’s immigration frontiers. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Mitsilegas, V. (2010). Extraterritorial immigration control in the 21st century: The individual and the state transformed. In B. Ryan & V. Mitsilegas (Eds.), Extraterritorial immigration control: Legal challenges (pp. 39–65). Brill: Leiden.
Monar, J. (2001). The dynamics of justice and home affairs: Laboratories, driving factors and costs. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 747–764.
Neuhold, C. (2001). The ‘Legislative Backbone’ keeping the institution upright? The role of European Parliament committees in the EU policy-making process. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 5(10). Retrieved February 19, 2009 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=302785
Neuhold, C. (2007). ‘We are the Employment Team’: Socialisation in European Parliament committees and possible effects on policy-making. Retrieved March 31, 2009 from http://aei.pitt.edu/7983/01/neuhold-c-11b.pdf
Peers, S. (2005). Transforming decision making on EC immigration and asylum law. European Law Review, 30(2), 285–296.
Rasmussen, A. (2007). Early conclusion in the co-decision legislative procedure. MWP working paper, European University Institute, 31. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://hdl.handle.net/1814/7635
Rijpma, J., & Cremona, M. (2007). The extra-territorialisation of EU migration policies and the rule of law, European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law. Retrieved April 12, 2012 from http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/6690/LAW_2007_01.pdf?sequence=1
Ringe, N. (2009). Who decides, and how?: Preferences, uncertainty, and policy choice in the European Parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ripoll Servent, A. (2011). Co-decision in the European Parliament: Comparing rationalist and constructivist explanations of the Returns Directive. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 7(1), 3–22.
Ripoll Servent, A. (2012). Playing the co-decision game? Rules’ changes and institutional adaptation at the LIBE committee. Journal of European Integration, 34(1), 55–73.
Rodier, C. (2005). Les camps d’étrangers, dispositif clef de la politique d’immigration et d’asile de l’Union européenne. Migreurop. Retrieved June 11, 2009, from http://www.migreurop.org/article801.html
Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and national polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Senato della Repubblica, (2008). Disposizioni in materia di sicurezza pubblica (provisions in the field of public security), Act of Senate n o 733. Retrieved April 19, 2011 from http://www.senato.it/service/PDF/PDFServer/BGT/00302495.pdf
Settembri, P., & Neuhold, C. (2009). Achieving consensus through committees: Does the European Parliament manage? Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(1), 127–151.
Shackleton, M. (2000). The politics of codecision. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 325–342.
Shackleton, M., & Raunio, T. (2003). Codecision since Amsterdam: A laboratory for institutional innovation and change. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 171–188.
Trauner, F., & Kruse, I. (2008). EC visa facilitation and readmission agreements: A new standard EU foreign policy tool? European Journal of Migration and Law, 10(4), 411–438.
Whitaker, R. (2005). National parties in the European Parliament: An influence in the committee system? European Union Politics, 6(1), 5–28.
Wolff, S. (2008). Border management in the Mediterranean: Internal, external and ethical challenges. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(2), 253–271.
Yordanova, N. (2011). Inter-institutional rules and division of power in the European Parliament: Allocation of consultation and co-decision reports. West European Politics, 34(1), 97–121.
Zolberg, A. R. (2002). Guarding the gates. In C. Calhoun, P. Price, & A. Timmer (Eds.), Understanding September 11. New York: The New Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ripoll Servent, A. (2012). The European Parliament and the Returns Directive: The End of Radical Contestation; The Start of Consensual Constraints. In: Anderson, B., Gibney, M., Paoletti, E. (eds) The Social, Political and Historical Contours of Deportation. Immigrants and Minorities, Politics and Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5864-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5864-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5863-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5864-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)