Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer patients, the appropriate indications and use of modern methods has been confirmed positive contributions that disease, disease-specific and overall survival in meta-analysis [1, 2]. The aim of RT is homogeneous distribution of the dose required for tumor control (±5%) at the target volume while protecting healthy tissue [3]. RT techniques can be difficult and vary depending on the anatomic structure of the region to be irradiated (breast, chest wall, or regional lymphatic) that target volumes could be in different depths and geometries [3–5]. Over time, with technologic advances and increasing experience in clinical practice, different simulation and treatment techniques have been developed [6–17]. Beginning in the 1950s, use of megavoltage treatment equipment in modern RT processes has reached a new point, with the use of magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and computed tomography (CT) for treatment planning and in determining the target volumes. In a realistic virtual environment, a large number of techniques can be reviewed and an optimal technique can be formed using modern planning computers. Intensity modulated radiotherapy is becoming increasingly popular for critical organ volumes and dose reductions better than for target volume can be achieved [18, 19].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Whelan TJ, Julian J, Wright J, et al. Does locoregional radiotherapy improve survival in breast cancer? A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1220–9.
Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–106.
İnternational Commission on Radiation and Measurements. Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy, (Supplement to ICRU Report 50). Bethesda, ICRU Report 62; 1999. p. 1–55.
Perez CA-Brady’s. Principles and practice of radiation oncology. 5th ed. Perez CA Chapter 53.
Gunderson-Teper. Clinical radiothion oncology. 3rd ed. In: Recht A, Buchholoz TA (eds) Chapter 61–62. Breast cancer. 2012. p. 1321–1338, 1338–1353.
Svensson GK, Bjarngard B, Iarsen RD, Levene MB. A modified three field technique for breast treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980;6(6):689–94.
Siddon RL, Tonnesen GL, Svensson GK. Three-field technique for breast treatment using a rotatable half-beam block. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1981;7:1473–7.
Mitine C, Dutreix A, Schueren E. Tangential breast irradiation: influence of technique of set-up on transfer errors and reproducibility. Radiother Oncol. 1991;22:308–10.
Marchal M. Three- field isosentric breast irradiation using asymetric jaws and a tilt board. Radiother Oncol. 1993;28(3):228–32.
Klein E, Taylor M, Lorenz M, et al. A mono isocentric technique for breast and regional nodal therapy using dual asymmetric jaws. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;28(3):753–60.
Kelly A, Wang X-Y, Chu JC, Hartsel WF. Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;34(3):727–32.
Carruthers LJ, Redpath AT, Kunkler IH, et al. The use of compensators to optimise the three dimensional dose distribution in radiotherapy of the intact breast. Radiother Oncol. 1999;50:291–300.
Hurkmans CW, Saarnak AE, Pieters BR, et al. An improved technique for breast cancer irradiation including the locoregional lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(5):1421–9.
Cormack M, Calcott J, Gillies J, MacLellan J. Tangential breast irradiation—optimising the technique. J Radiother Pract. 2001;2:117–23.
Pierce LJ, Butler JB, Martel MK, et al. Postmastectomy radiotherapy of the chest wall: dosimetric comparison of common techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:1220–30.
Lu XQ, Sullivan S, Eggleston T, et al. A precise geometric matching using multileaf collimator–equipped linear accelerators. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(5):1420–31.
Truong PT, Berthelet E, Patenaude V, et al. Setup variations in locoregional radiotherapy for breast cancer: an electronic portal imaging study. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:742–5.
Donovan E, Bleakley N, Denholm E, et al. Randomised trial of standard 2D radiotherapy (RT) versus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients prescribed breast radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2007;82:254–64.
Peulen H, Hanbeukers B, Boersma L, et al. Forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning in breast cancer to improve dose homogenıty: feasibility of class solutions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(1):394–400.
Hurkmans CW, Borger JH, Bos LJ, et al. Cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast cancer irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2000;55:145–51.
Giordano G, Kuo Y, Freeman J, et al. Risk of cardiac death after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:419–24.
Çetintaş SK, Özkan L, Kurt M, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after breast conserving management [Turkish experience]. Breast. 2002;11(1):72–80.
Veldeman L, Gersem W, Speleers B, et al. Alternated prone and supine whole-breast ırradiation using IMRT: setup precision, respiratory movement and treatment time. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011:1–10. Article in press. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.
İrdesel J, Özkan L, Kurt, et al. The role of rehabilitation in the prevention of shoulder limitation and lymphedema after axillary dissection and radiation therapy. 10th European Congress of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Abstract Book, Rehabilitation, Roma; 1997. p. 257.
Thilmann C, Adamietz IA, Saran F, et al. The use of a standardized positioning support cushion during daily routine of breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41:459–63.
Nalder CA, Bidmead AM, Mubata CD, et al. Influence of a vac-fix immobilization device on the accuracy of patient positioning during routine breast radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:249–54.
Varga Z, Hideghéty K, Mezo T, et al. Individual positioning: a comparative study of adjuvant breast radiotherapy in the prone versus supine position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(1):94–100.
Griem K, Fetherston P, Kuznetsova M, et al. Three-dimensional photon dosimetry: a comparison of treatment of the intact breast in the supine and prone position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(3):891–9.
Algan O, Fowble B, McNeeley S, et al. Use of the prone position in radiation treatment for women with early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;40(5):1137–40.
Campana F, Kırova Y, Rosenwald JC, et al. Breast radiotherapy in the lateral decubitus position: a technique to prevent lung and heart irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(5):1348–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cetintas, S.K., Ozkan, L., Gozcu, S., Altay, A. (2013). Simulation and Patient Fixation Methods. In: Haydaroglu, A., Ozyigit, G. (eds) Principles and Practice of Modern Radiotherapy Techniques in Breast Cancer. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5116-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5116-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5115-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5116-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)